Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Astro Forum  »  HOW STEPHEN HAWKING CHANGED THE WORLD...
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Pentcho Valev...
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:06 am
Guest
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/nationaltreasures/2193785/Prof-Stephen-Hawkin-portrait.html
"Professor Stephen Hawking is responsible for changing the way the
world looks at the basic laws governing the universe."

In order to change the world, Professor Stephen Hawking explained to
it that the Michelson-Morley experiment had confirmed, once and for
all, the validity of Einstein's 1905 false light postulate and had
refuted, once and for all, the prediction of Newton's emission theory
of light according to which the speed of light does depend on the
speed of the emitter or the observer:

http://www.hawking.org.uk/lectures/dice.html
Professor Stephen Hawking: "Interestingly enough, Laplace himself
wrote a paper in 1799 on how some stars could have a gravitational
field so strong that light could not escape, but would be dragged back
onto the star. He even calculated that a star of the same density as
the Sun, but two hundred and fifty times the size, would have this
property. But although Laplace may not have realised it, the same idea
had been put forward 16 years earlier by a Cambridge man, John
Mitchell, in a paper in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society. Both Mitchell and Laplace thought of light as consisting of
particles, rather like cannon balls, that could be slowed down by
gravity, and made to fall back on the star. But a famous experiment,
carried out by two Americans, Michelson and Morley in 1887, showed
that light always travelled at a speed of one hundred and eighty six
thousand miles a second, no matter where it came from. How then could
gravity slow down light, and make it fall back."

http://www.time.com/time/time100/poc/magazine/a_brief_history_of_rela6a.html
Professor Stephen Hawking: "But Michelson and Morley found no daily or
yearly differences between the two beams of light. It was as if light
always traveled at the same speed relative to you, no matter how you
were moving."

So the world changed to such an extent that, when on reading John
Norton's explanation:

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001743/02/Norton.pdf
John Norton: "Einstein regarded the Michelson-Morley experiment as
evidence for the principle of relativity, whereas later writers almost
universally use it as support for the light postulate of special
relativity......THE MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT IS FULLY COMPATIBLE
WITH AN EMISSION THEORY OF LIGHT THAT CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT
POSTULATE."

all Einstein zombies simultaneously declare:

"Zombie believe Master John Norton not. Zombie believe Master Stephen
Hawking yes. Master Stephen Hawking clever very clever. Experiment say
Divine Albert right. Experiment say Michell wrong. Michell not clever
very clever. Master John Norton not clever very clever. Divine Albert
yes clever very clever. Master Stephen Hawking yes clever very
clever."

Then zombies sing "Divine Einstein" and go into convulsions.

Pentcho Valev
pvalev at (no spam) yahoo.com
hhc314 at (no spam) yahoo.com...
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:56 pm
Guest
On Jun 27, 12:06 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/nationaltreasures/2193785/...
"Professor Stephen Hawking is responsible for changing the way the
world looks at the basic laws governing the universe."

In order to change the world, Professor Stephen Hawking explained to
it that the Michelson-Morley experiment had confirmed, once and for
all, the validity of Einstein's 1905 false light postulate and had
refuted, once and for all, the prediction of Newton's emission theory
of light according to which the speed of light does depend on the
speed of the emitter or the observer:

http://www.hawking.org.uk/lectures/dice.html
Professor Stephen Hawking: "Interestingly enough, Laplace himself
wrote a paper in 1799 on how some stars could have a gravitational
field so strong that light could not escape, but would be dragged back
onto the star. He even calculated that a star of the same density as
the Sun, but two hundred and fifty times the size, would have this
property. But although Laplace may not have realised it, the same idea
had been put forward 16 years earlier by a Cambridge man, John
Mitchell, in a paper in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society. Both Mitchell and Laplace thought of light as consisting of
particles, rather like cannon balls, that could be slowed down by
gravity, and made to fall back on the star. But a famous experiment,
carried out by two Americans, Michelson and Morley in 1887, showed
that light always travelled at a speed of one hundred and eighty six
thousand miles a second, no matter where it came from. How then could
gravity slow down light, and make it fall back."

http://www.time.com/time/time100/poc/magazine/a_brief_history_of_rela...
Professor Stephen Hawking: "But Michelson and Morley found no daily or
yearly differences between the two beams of light. It was as if light
always traveled at the same speed relative to you, no matter how you
were moving."

So the world changed to such an extent that, when on reading John
Norton's explanation:

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001743/02/Norton.pdf
John Norton: "Einstein regarded the Michelson-Morley experiment as
evidence for the principle of relativity, whereas later writers almost
universally use it as support for the light postulate of special
relativity......THE MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT IS FULLY COMPATIBLE
WITH AN EMISSION THEORY OF LIGHT THAT CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT
POSTULATE."

all Einstein zombies simultaneously declare:

"Zombie believe Master John Norton not. Zombie believe Master Stephen
Hawking yes. Master Stephen Hawking clever very clever. Experiment say
Divine Albert right. Experiment say Michell wrong. Michell not clever
very clever. Master John Norton not clever very clever. Divine Albert
yes clever very clever. Master Stephen Hawking yes clever very
clever."

Then zombies sing "Divine Einstein" and go into convulsions.

Pentcho Valev
pva... at (no spam) yahoo.com

Pentcho, why not spend the next to years in mastering Newtonian
mechanics. Then after that, study the consequenes of Maxwell's work
on the electromagnetic waves, then begin to address the consequences
of Einstein's revelation. I'd guess that, assuming you have the "right
stuff", within around 6-7 years of intensive study, you will actually
know some physics.

You will not learn it from Hawking's table-top books sold at the mass
market booksellers.

In spite of the fact that Hawking is a media favorite, I cannot ever
recall even a single citation to anything that Hawking has ever
published in any advanced physics textbook. Don't you find that at
least a bit strange, since he himself was proclaimed his discoveries
to be nothing short of the greatest ever made in science? I you
believe anything of this sort, you likely believe that Al Gore
invented the Internet! :-)

If and when you actually study physics, your will realize this
yourself. When you do, I believe that you should return to this
newsgroup an post a sincere apology to all of the few remaining
physicists that actually participate in this newsgroup for all of your
past crap posts.

Harry C.
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 05, 2008 10:47 am