AFTER ALL, Jack Tomsky, one of the ignorants was R.A.
Fisher !!!

*************

Afonso found someone on the Internet who is as
ignorant about hypothesis testing as he is.
Jack (moderator)
*****************************


Jack Tomsky that I did find **** another ignorant ***
that believes a Null Hypotheses could not stated
true.
QUOTING FROM
www.minitab.com/support/answers/answer.aspx?log=0&id=1
350
***
Ronald A. Fisher succinctly discusses the key point

In relation to any experiment we may speak cf… the “
null hypotheses “ and it should be noted that the
null hypotheses is never proved or established, but
is possibly disproved in the course of
experimentation. Every experiment may be said to
exist only in order to give the facts a chance of
disproving the null hypotheses.
***************************
Luis Amaral Afonso [The moderator destroyer]

Jack Tomsky said

*** Afonso made this up. I have always said that p=0
means p=0. Afonso's position has always been that p=0
does not mean that p=0.***


My response

Do you see, bokdan.hermicz at (no spam) googlemail.com how
wasteful was your help move to Jack Tomsky endless
imbecilities concerning Hypotheses Tests?
He is unable to understand that when we
*********** fail to reject H0 **************
is not synonymous that this condition p=0 is proved
true. Consequently to state p=0 is the Himalaya of
stupidity. I had shown, through n example,
(unsuccessfully) that H0 failed to be rejected is
compatible with a more or less large interval p could
be found. On the limit (infinite sample size) one
could think CI amplitude equal to ZERO:
Even protected by a pseudonymous is very risky
bokdan.hermicz at (no spam) googlemail.com to support Jack´s
imbecilities.

Luis Amaral Afonso [The moderator destroyer]

__1__ Considering the set of all possible parameter’s
values (the parameters space) and the sub-set that
leads to NOT REJECTING H0. I called *** THE
ACCEPTANCE INTERVAL*** (generally speaking, an
interval),.

__2__Because though it contains the parameter value
relative to THE NULL HYPOTHESES *** which’s A SINGLE
POINT OF THE PARAMETERS SPACE ***
__3__IN CONSEQUENCE IS ABSURD TO STATE THAT ONE
ACCEPT THE NULL HYPOTHESES BECAUSE IT WAS PROVEN
TRUE.

sufficient evidence to reject H0. (Jack Tomsky in
view of the tremendous ignorance he is shown in
various Statistical matters is not allowed to call
Statisticians to whatever: he unquestionably proves
that do not belongs to this set of persons). Luis
Amaral Afonso

[The moderator destroyer]