Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Engineering - Lighting Forum  »  Dimmable CFL recomendations...
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
RickR...
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 9:24 am
Guest
I have a client looking to replace several hundred 25W color dipped
incandescents.

I'd like to hear opinions on quality, reliable dimmable CFLs. (USA
120V)
They are currently using an ancient (1920-30 ish) autotransformer
theatrical piano board system. It is falling apart so we are also
hoping to upgrade to a modern afair.

Budget is of course the limiting factor, but I reliablility is primary
as these lamps are very hard to get to.

Thanks for the thoughts,
RickR
Adam Aglionby...
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:41 am
Guest
On Jun 5, 8:24 pm, RickR <r... at (no spam) silhouettelights.com> wrote:
Quote:
I have a client looking to replace several hundred 25W color dipped
incandescents.

I'd like to hear opinions on quality, reliable dimmable CFLs. (USA
120V)
They are currently using an ancient (1920-30 ish) autotransformer
theatrical piano board system. It is falling apart so we are also
hoping to upgrade to a modern afair.

Budget is of course the limiting factor, but I reliablility is primary
as these lamps are very hard to get to.

Thanks for the thoughts,
RickR

25W colour dipped, with piano board, atmospheric theatre, twinkling
stars or colour changing ceiling?

LED has got to be worth considering, in colours at these sort of
wattages it will be most efficient way of getting saturated
colours.Low maintenace, low power consumption, lower load on the
HVAC.

CFL dosent`t do red well.

Adam
RickR...
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 3:19 pm
Guest
Quote:

25W colour dipped,  with piano board, atmospheric theatre, twinkling
stars or colour changing ceiling?

LED has got to be worth considering, in colours at these sort of
wattages it will be most efficient way of getting saturated
colours.Low maintenace, low power consumption, lower load on the
HVAC.

CFL dosent`t do red well.

Adam

Yes this is a weird set up!
The original lamps were dipped, I'm planning on quality color filter
sleaves. I still have to deal with the source, but there is wide range
of filter choices, including custom

I'd like to do LED but I need the output of a CFL. Call it something
over 1000 lumens per linear foot. I also have med. screw sockets so we
wouldn't be doing major electrical...

Thanks for the thoughts!

RickR
Adam Aglionby...
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:20 am
Guest
On Jun 11, 2:19 am, RickR <r... at (no spam) silhouettelights.com> wrote:
Quote:
25W colour dipped, with piano board, atmospheric theatre, twinkling
stars or colour changing ceiling?

LED has got to be worth considering, in colours at these sort of
wattages it will be most efficient way of getting saturated
colours.Low maintenace, low power consumption, lower load on the
HVAC.

CFL dosent`t do red well.

Adam

Yes this is a weird set up!
The original lamps were dipped, I'm planning on quality color filter
sleaves. I still have to deal with the source, but there is wide range
of filter choices, including custom

I'd like to do LED but I need the output of a CFL. Call it something
over 1000 lumens per linear foot. I also have med. screw sockets so we
wouldn't be doing major electrical...

Thanks for the thoughts!

RickR

Wouldn`t rule out LED totally , output of a CFL is going to be dropped
considerably going through a filter.They also won`t din to zero.
Might be possible to get a retrofit LED lamp assembled to fit into the
existing fittings and operate on conventional dimming.
London Appollo Victoria was fitted out 5 years ago , when LEDs weren`t
as bright:

http://www.oshino-led.co.uk/gallery_apollo.html

Adam
Victor Roberts...
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:09 pm
Guest
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:19:15 -0700 (PDT), RickR
<rick at (no spam) silhouettelights.com> wrote:

Quote:

25W colour dipped,  with piano board, atmospheric theatre, twinkling
stars or colour changing ceiling?

LED has got to be worth considering, in colours at these sort of
wattages it will be most efficient way of getting saturated
colours.Low maintenace, low power consumption, lower load on the
HVAC.

CFL dosent`t do red well.

Adam

Yes this is a weird set up!
The original lamps were dipped, I'm planning on quality color filter
sleaves. I still have to deal with the source, but there is wide range
of filter choices, including custom

I'd like to do LED but I need the output of a CFL. Call it something
over 1000 lumens per linear foot. I also have med. screw sockets so we
wouldn't be doing major electrical...

Thanks for the thoughts!

RickR

Since almost all fluorescent lamps use a "white" phosphor,
LEDs are almost always more efficient than color-filtered
fluorescent lamps.

--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
RickR...
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:08 am
Guest
On Jun 12, 10:09 am, Victor Roberts <x... at (no spam) lighting-research.com>
wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:19:15 -0700 (PDT), RickR

Since almost all fluorescent lamps use a "white" phosphor,
LEDs are almost always more efficient than color-filtered
fluorescent lamps.

--
Vic Robertshttp://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

All true, but efficiency is not a major factor once we get out of
incandescent. My goals are:
1 price - if they can't buy it the rest is irrelevant
2 lamp life
3 output (& distribution)
4 DMX control

I did just talk with a manufacturer that is "playing around" with an
asymetric lens for a LED strip with ~500 lumens per foot. The bad news
is we are still talking about $400+ per foot. CFLs would be less than
10% of that for a similar output, assuming 50% loss for color
filtering.

RickR
Victor Roberts...
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:51 am
Guest
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:08:29 -0700 (PDT), RickR
<rick at (no spam) silhouettelights.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Jun 12, 10:09 am, Victor Roberts <x... at (no spam) lighting-research.com
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:19:15 -0700 (PDT), RickR

Since almost all fluorescent lamps use a "white" phosphor,
LEDs are almost always more efficient than color-filtered
fluorescent lamps.

--
Vic Robertshttp://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

All true, but efficiency is not a major factor once we get out of
incandescent. My goals are:
1 price - if they can't buy it the rest is irrelevant
2 lamp life
3 output (& distribution)
4 DMX control

I did just talk with a manufacturer that is "playing around" with an
asymetric lens for a LED strip with ~500 lumens per foot. The bad news
is we are still talking about $400+ per foot. CFLs would be less than
10% of that for a similar output, assuming 50% loss for color
filtering.

RickR

The actual loss with color filtering may be more like 80%.
Even then CFLs would have a lower initial cost - though the
cost payback for the LEDs would be much better.

--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
Adam Aglionby...
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:17 pm
Guest
On Jun 13, 7:08 pm, RickR <r... at (no spam) silhouettelights.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Jun 12, 10:09 am, Victor Roberts <x... at (no spam) lighting-research.com
wrote:



On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:19:15 -0700 (PDT), RickR
Since almost all fluorescent lamps use a "white" phosphor,
LEDs are almost always more efficient than color-filtered
fluorescent lamps.

--
Vic Robertshttp://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

All true, but efficiency is not a major factor once we get out of
incandescent. My goals are:
1 price - if they can't buy it the rest is irrelevant
2 lamp life
3 output (& distribution)
4 DMX control

I did just talk with a manufacturer that is "playing around" with an
asymetric lens for a LED strip with ~500 lumens per foot. The bad news
is we are still talking about $400+ per foot. CFLs would be less than
10% of that for a similar output, assuming 50% loss for color
filtering.

Lets have another look at the numbers, 1000 lumens a foot would be
substantial step up from existing installation with colour dipped 25W
incandescent, picturing some sort of tubular lamp?

50% loss plus the rest, Rosco Supergel, big brand theatrical colour
filter

#26 Light Red Visible light transmission 12%
#68 Sky Blue VLT 14%
Leaf Green #386 VLT 32%

Arbitary personal choice of colours, without going too light.
Rosco do make a range of primary colour gel specfically for cyclorama
lighting, usually run in continuous RGB rows top and bottom of a cyc,
colours are silks though which has a grain in the filter to help blend
adjacent edges, slight transmission loss in the grain, transmission %:

Green 13%
Blue 8%
Red 12%

This is total visible light transmission, with fluro SPD your not
playing with 100% to start with....

As a replacement for existing lamps a board populated with 5mm LEDs
will be at least as bright, again picturing lamp as like a `long nose`
pygmy lamp. Symmetric beam profile but possible to use beam shaping
film on output.Plug and play.

High power LEDs have a range of assymetric lens for most of them,
typically letterbox profile, and because of small source size most of
the light is delivered out the front. Slightly more demanding thermal
requirements, lamp bars are going to be thin and wide or narrow and
deep. Drivers and power requiremnts a bit more special.

Strangley the original dimmers would be the best for cotrolling either
probably, on resistive wired 5mm LED, dimming on SCR might look a bit
steppy on slow fades. Autotransformer would dim lovely, now just need
a DMX to Ward Leonard interface ;-)

Adam
RickR...
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:00 pm
Guest
On Jun 15, 7:17 pm, Adam Aglionby <ledli... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Jun 13, 7:08 pm, RickR <r... at (no spam) silhouettelights.com> wrote:





On Jun 12, 10:09 am, Victor Roberts <x... at (no spam) lighting-research.com
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:19:15 -0700 (PDT), RickR
Since almost all fluorescent lamps use a "white" phosphor,
LEDs are almost always more efficient than color-filtered
fluorescent lamps.

--
Vic Robertshttp://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

All true, but efficiency is not a major factor once we get out of
incandescent. My goals are:
1 price - if they can't buy it the rest is irrelevant
2 lamp life
3 output (& distribution)
4 DMX control

I did just talk with a manufacturer that is "playing around" with an
asymetric lens for a LED strip with ~500 lumens per foot. The bad news
is we are still talking about $400+ per foot. CFLs would be less than
10% of that for a similar output, assuming 50% loss for color
filtering.

Lets have another look at the numbers, 1000 lumens a foot would be
substantial step up from existing installation with colour dipped 25W
incandescent, picturing some sort of tubular lamp?

50% loss plus the rest, Rosco Supergel, big brand theatrical colour
filter

#26 Light Red Visible light transmission 12%
#68 Sky Blue VLT 14%
Leaf Green #386 VLT 32%

Arbitary personal choice of colours, without going too light.
Rosco do make a range of primary colour gel specfically for cyclorama
lighting, usually run in continuous RGB rows top and bottom of a cyc,
colours are silks though which has a grain in the filter to help blend
adjacent edges, slight transmission loss in the grain, transmission %:

Green 13%
Blue     8%
Red    12%

This is total visible light transmission, with fluro SPD your not
playing with 100% to start with....

As a replacement for existing lamps a board populated with 5mm LEDs
will be at least as bright, again picturing lamp as like a `long nose`
pygmy lamp. Symmetric beam profile but possible to use beam shaping
film on output.Plug and play.

High power LEDs have a range of assymetric lens for most of them,
typically letterbox profile, and because of small source size most of
the light is delivered out the front. Slightly more demanding thermal
requirements, lamp bars are going to be thin and wide or narrow and
deep. Drivers and power requiremnts a bit more special.

Strangley the original dimmers would be the best for cotrolling either
probably, on  resistive wired 5mm LED, dimming on SCR might look a bit
steppy on slow fades. Autotransformer would dim lovely, now just need
a DMX to Ward Leonard interface ;-)

Adam- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Ward Leonard, I don't know. But the autotransformer doesn't dim
anything at the moment. :-(

My filtering losses were off the cuff, because I have them both on the
existing (25A19) and the CFLs so the raw comparison is probably
accurate. I tossed out some numbers to get away from the stuff I've
seen as cove lighting, its all just too dim. Converting general
illumination lumens to color LED output is an art yet to be mastered,
as far as I can tell. Positioning, distribution, various loss factors,
internal reflection... We will have so many unknowns that just getting
a rough estimate is, well rough.

Adam, you've roughed out the basic needs well. Have you seen such a
fixture? Sure one can be custom built, but will it be UL? By a
reliable company that will stand behind the marketing claims, even
those claims made by their suppliers??

Perhaps by the time this client is ready to spend some money we'll
have some better choices, or at least variables with smaller ranges.

Thanks,
RickR
NeilCarmichael...
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:22 pm
Guest
On Jun 5, 8:24 pm, RickR <r... at (no spam) silhouettelights.com> wrote:
Quote:
I have a client looking to replace several hundred 25W color dipped
incandescents.

I'd like to hear opinions on quality, reliable dimmable CFLs. (USA
120V)
They are currently using an ancient (1920-30 ish) autotransformer
theatrical piano board system. It is falling apart so we are also
hoping to upgrade to a modern afair.

Budget is of course the limiting factor, but I reliablility is primary
as these lamps are very hard to get to.

Thanks for the thoughts,
RickR

Okay, if your are set on CFL, here's my 2c, I'm guessing if the
control gear is old, the wiring is too, so you are going to have
rewire, so install a six core flex and go for normal dsi dimmed cfl's
rather than mains dimmed. This will give you smoother dimming (dsi has
a built-in dimmer curve), complete control (unlike 1-10v, dsi can
extinguish a fixture) and a bigger more mature range of equipment to
choose from.
Adam Aglionby...
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:58 pm
Guest
On Jun 17, 12:00 am, RickR <r... at (no spam) silhouettelights.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Jun 15, 7:17 pm, Adam Aglionby <ledli... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:



On Jun 13, 7:08 pm, RickR <r... at (no spam) silhouettelights.com> wrote:

On Jun 12, 10:09 am, Victor Roberts <x... at (no spam) lighting-research.com
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:19:15 -0700 (PDT), RickR
Since almost all fluorescent lamps use a "white" phosphor,
LEDs are almost always more efficient than color-filtered
fluorescent lamps.

--
Vic Robertshttp://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
To reply via e-mail:
replace xxx with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

All true, but efficiency is not a major factor once we get out of
incandescent. My goals are:
1 price - if they can't buy it the rest is irrelevant
2 lamp life
3 output (& distribution)
4 DMX control

I did just talk with a manufacturer that is "playing around" with an
asymetric lens for a LED strip with ~500 lumens per foot. The bad news
is we are still talking about $400+ per foot. CFLs would be less than
10% of that for a similar output, assuming 50% loss for color
filtering.

Lets have another look at the numbers, 1000 lumens a foot would be
substantial step up from existing installation with colour dipped 25W
incandescent, picturing some sort of tubular lamp?

50% loss plus the rest, Rosco Supergel, big brand theatrical colour
filter

#26 Light Red Visible light transmission 12%
#68 Sky Blue VLT 14%
Leaf Green #386 VLT 32%

Arbitary personal choice of colours, without going too light.
Rosco do make a range of primary colour gel specfically for cyclorama
lighting, usually run in continuous RGB rows top and bottom of a cyc,
colours are silks though which has a grain in the filter to help blend
adjacent edges, slight transmission loss in the grain, transmission %:

Green 13%
Blue 8%
Red 12%

This is total visible light transmission, with fluro SPD your not
playing with 100% to start with....

As a replacement for existing lamps a board populated with 5mm LEDs
will be at least as bright, again picturing lamp as like a `long nose`
pygmy lamp. Symmetric beam profile but possible to use beam shaping
film on output.Plug and play.

High power LEDs have a range of assymetric lens for most of them,
typically letterbox profile, and because of small source size most of
the light is delivered out the front. Slightly more demanding thermal
requirements, lamp bars are going to be thin and wide or narrow and
deep. Drivers and power requiremnts a bit more special.

Strangley the original dimmers would be the best for cotrolling either
probably, on resistive wired 5mm LED, dimming on SCR might look a bit
steppy on slow fades. Autotransformer would dim lovely, now just need
a DMX to Ward Leonard interface ;-)

Adam- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Ward Leonard, I don't know. But the autotransformer doesn't dim
anything at the moment. :-(

My filtering losses were off the cuff, because I have them both on the
existing (25A19) and the CFLs so the raw comparison is probably
accurate. I tossed out some numbers to get away from the stuff I've
seen as cove lighting, its all just too dim. Converting general
illumination lumens to color LED output is an art yet to be mastered,
as far as I can tell. Positioning, distribution, various loss factors,
internal reflection... We will have so many unknowns that just getting
a rough estimate is, well rough.

There is some move to change Blue lumens I beleive as eye sensitivity
may be better at blue thn was thought in 1932 when the colourspace was
roughed out.

Quote:

Adam, you've roughed out the basic needs well. Have you seen such a
fixture? Sure one can be custom built, but will it be UL? By a
reliable company that will stand behind the marketing claims, even
those claims made by their suppliers??

Perhaps by the time this client is ready to spend some money we'll
have some better choices, or at least variables with smaller ranges.

Thanks,
RickR

Was vaguely thinking of was Mule retrofit lamps,

http://www.mulelighting.com/viewDetails.asp?id=70

Dunno if Lighting Science old Led Effects are still interetsed in
customs

http://www.lsgc.com

then suggesting to client that Christmas lights look nice and might
actually fit their budget ;-)

Adam
Don Klipstein...
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:51 pm
Guest
In <2e8777a2-34c1-43a1-9b1e-7cb5cef3b7b9 at (no spam) c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
Adam Aglionby wrote in part:

Quote:
There is some move to change Blue lumens I beleive as eye sensitivity
may be better at blue thn was thought in 1932 when the colourspace was
roughed out.

The main early-1930's chromaticity diagram is the CIE one of 1931.

The official photopic function as "held official by CIE" had its
"adoption" change in 1988 to one that has higher values at wavelengths
below 460 nm, especially below 450 nm.
However, the change is at wavelengths short enough to have very minor
impact onto number of lumens in 1 watt of "most white light" of only a
fraction of 1%.

The older photopic function is V(lambda), determined in 1924. That one
became the CIE "Y-bar" function of 1931.

The newer one appears to me to be Vm(lambda), determined by Vos in 1978
although adopted by CIE as "The Photopic Function" in 1988. This did not
change the Y-bar function, so now the Y-bar function (for the "main
chromaticity determination system" (my words), which remains the "1931
system", is no longer exactly matching the "official photopic function"
since 1988.

The 1978 Vm(lambda) is available at:

http://cvrl.ioo.ucl.ac.uk/database/data/lum/logvme_1.txt

Page it is linked from:

http://cvrl.ioo.ucl.ac.uk/lumindex.htm

(Which also has linking to the older 1924 V(lambda function)


I have the "1988 CIE official" photopic function at:
http://members.misty.com/don/photopic.html

however, I do not have citation as to where that came from originally -
it merely got passed onto me by someone that I trust to *at least largely*
know what is worth passing on.
I suspect it is the 1978 "Vos" Vm(lambda) - could have taken a decade to
have been adopted by CIE after being determined.

- Don Klipstein (don at (no spam) misty.com)
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:20 am