| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Engineering - Joining (Welding) Forum » Second dumb question of the month coupon...
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| SteveB... |
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 12:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I know I already used one coupon this month, so sue me.
I bought an old SA 200 welder with a 1.75 kw rated plug for tools. This is
stated in the Lincoln download manual. The current available is 15 amps,
per manual.
I am interested if I can run a 110v. Lincoln 140 MIG on that circuit. The
required amperage at FULL LOAD is 20 amps. I do not see any breakers on the
SA 200, so don't know what type of protection they have on there if a larger
than acceptable load is put on that circuit. Also, there are two plugs on
the machine. Any way to wire the two together to up the amperage? (maybe
that's the third dumb question ...........)
Can I just use a tester and check the voltage and amperage on those plugs
with the machine running? For the electricital whizzes out there, what does
1.75 kw convert to in layman's terms?
Could I use this intermittently on a very short duty cycle for wrought iron
repairs, or even look for a smaller machine that has less current draw? Is
there such a thing? This would be for small .065" tubing repairs.
If absolutely necessary, I can use the DC part of the welder and 3/32" 6011
DCSP.
Steve
--
"...the man who really counts in the world is the doer, not the mere
critic-the man who actually does the work, even if roughly and imperfectly,
not the man who only talks or writes about how it ought to be done."
Theodore Roosevelt 1891 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Pete C.... |
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 8:06 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
SteveB wrote:
Quote:
I know I already used one coupon this month, so sue me.
I bought an old SA 200 welder with a 1.75 kw rated plug for tools. This is
stated in the Lincoln download manual. The current available is 15 amps,
per manual.
I am interested if I can run a 110v. Lincoln 140 MIG on that circuit. The
required amperage at FULL LOAD is 20 amps. I do not see any breakers on the
SA 200, so don't know what type of protection they have on there if a larger
than acceptable load is put on that circuit. Also, there are two plugs on
the machine. Any way to wire the two together to up the amperage? (maybe
that's the third dumb question ...........)
Can I just use a tester and check the voltage and amperage on those plugs
with the machine running? For the electricital whizzes out there, what does
1.75 kw convert to in layman's terms?
Could I use this intermittently on a very short duty cycle for wrought iron
repairs, or even look for a smaller machine that has less current draw? Is
there such a thing? This would be for small .065" tubing repairs.
If absolutely necessary, I can use the DC part of the welder and 3/32" 6011
DCSP.
Steve
I recall that utility outlet provided 110V DC, not AC, if that is indeed
the case, the answer is "no, no, hell no". |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Ignoramus18547... |
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 8:27 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
That's what Lincoln "LN-25" is for.
It is a wire feed that gets its power from across the arc and can run
from a CC source.
i |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Maxwell... |
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 9:35 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"SteveB" <toquerville,utah at (no spam) zionvistas> wrote in message
news:uip7f5-n5l.ln1 at (no spam) news.infowest.com...
Quote: I know I already used one coupon this month, so sue me.
I bought an old SA 200 welder with a 1.75 kw rated plug for tools. This
is stated in the Lincoln download manual. The current available is 15
amps, per manual.
Does this mean if you downloaded two more manuals, you could run 45 amps? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| SteveB... |
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 11:52 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Maxwell" <luv2^fly99 at (no spam) cox.^net> wrote in message
news:x7jUj.31800$KJ1.11350 at (no spam) newsfe19.lga...
Quote:
"SteveB" <toquerville,utah at (no spam) zionvistas> wrote in message
news:uip7f5-n5l.ln1 at (no spam) news.infowest.com...
I know I already used one coupon this month, so sue me.
I bought an old SA 200 welder with a 1.75 kw rated plug for tools. This
is stated in the Lincoln download manual. The current available is 15
amps, per manual.
Does this mean if you downloaded two more manuals, you could run 45 amps?
Would that be series or parallel?
Steve |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| RoyJ... |
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 2:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
According to page 4 of ONE of the SA-200manuals (not sure which one you
have)
http://content.lincolnelectric.com//pdfs/products/navigator/im/IM276.pdf
the 115 volt output is DC, so a wire feed with definitely NOT work. As
in fry the wire feed welder instantly kind of not work.
Worse than that, it indicates that there is no real overload protection
other than the circuit board. Not a good thing.
SteveB wrote:
Quote: I know I already used one coupon this month, so sue me.
I bought an old SA 200 welder with a 1.75 kw rated plug for tools. This is
stated in the Lincoln download manual. The current available is 15 amps,
per manual.
I am interested if I can run a 110v. Lincoln 140 MIG on that circuit. The
required amperage at FULL LOAD is 20 amps. I do not see any breakers on the
SA 200, so don't know what type of protection they have on there if a larger
than acceptable load is put on that circuit. Also, there are two plugs on
the machine. Any way to wire the two together to up the amperage? (maybe
that's the third dumb question ...........)
Can I just use a tester and check the voltage and amperage on those plugs
with the machine running? For the electricital whizzes out there, what does
1.75 kw convert to in layman's terms?
Could I use this intermittently on a very short duty cycle for wrought iron
repairs, or even look for a smaller machine that has less current draw? Is
there such a thing? This would be for small .065" tubing repairs.
If absolutely necessary, I can use the DC part of the welder and 3/32" 6011
DCSP.
Steve
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Grant Erwin... |
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 3:47 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Just use it to run your grinders, which are very happy running on DC.
Grant
RoyJ wrote:
Quote: According to page 4 of ONE of the SA-200manuals (not sure which one you
have)
http://content.lincolnelectric.com//pdfs/products/navigator/im/IM276.pdf
the 115 volt output is DC, so a wire feed with definitely NOT work. As
in fry the wire feed welder instantly kind of not work.
Worse than that, it indicates that there is no real overload protection
other than the circuit board. Not a good thing.
SteveB wrote:
I know I already used one coupon this month, so sue me.
I bought an old SA 200 welder with a 1.75 kw rated plug for tools.
This is stated in the Lincoln download manual. The current available
is 15 amps, per manual.
I am interested if I can run a 110v. Lincoln 140 MIG on that circuit.
The required amperage at FULL LOAD is 20 amps. I do not see any
breakers on the SA 200, so don't know what type of protection they
have on there if a larger than acceptable load is put on that
circuit. Also, there are two plugs on the machine. Any way to wire
the two together to up the amperage? (maybe that's the third dumb
question ...........)
Can I just use a tester and check the voltage and amperage on those
plugs with the machine running? For the electricital whizzes out
there, what does 1.75 kw convert to in layman's terms?
Could I use this intermittently on a very short duty cycle for wrought
iron repairs, or even look for a smaller machine that has less current
draw? Is there such a thing? This would be for small .065" tubing
repairs.
If absolutely necessary, I can use the DC part of the welder and 3/32"
6011 DCSP.
Steve
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Grant Erwin... |
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 9:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
SteveB wrote:
Quote: "Grant Erwin" <grant at (no spam) NOSPAMkirkland.net> wrote in message
news:dFJUj.296$Nf.194 at (no spam) trndny03...
Just use it to run your grinders, which are very happy running on DC.
Grant
RoyJ wrote:
According to page 4 of ONE of the SA-200manuals (not sure which one you
have)
http://content.lincolnelectric.com//pdfs/products/navigator/im/IM276.pdf
the 115 volt output is DC, so a wire feed with definitely NOT work. As in
fry the wire feed welder instantly kind of not work.
Worse than that, it indicates that there is no real overload protection
other than the circuit board. Not a good thing.
Talked to the local artisan today. A lot of his work is approaching 5
years of age, and occasionally needs a tweak, a lock adjust, a hinge
adjustment. He doesn't want to take two guys off making gates and CUSTOM
work to go do this.
I, on the other hand, want to go do this light work. Only thing I have to
do is get a Lincoln 140 MIG so I can merely plug into the homeowner's 110
power supply. Looks like I may have a good referral source, and as this is
normal wear and tear and kids swinging on the gates kinds of fixups, it
comes under hourly. We're going to talk again in a couple of days.
Steve
And your question is .. ?? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| SteveB... |
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 9:59 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Grant Erwin" <grant at (no spam) NOSPAMkirkland.net> wrote in message
news:dFJUj.296$Nf.194 at (no spam) trndny03...
Quote: Just use it to run your grinders, which are very happy running on DC.
Grant
RoyJ wrote:
According to page 4 of ONE of the SA-200manuals (not sure which one you
have)
http://content.lincolnelectric.com//pdfs/products/navigator/im/IM276.pdf
the 115 volt output is DC, so a wire feed with definitely NOT work. As in
fry the wire feed welder instantly kind of not work.
Worse than that, it indicates that there is no real overload protection
other than the circuit board. Not a good thing.
Talked to the local artisan today. A lot of his work is approaching 5
years of age, and occasionally needs a tweak, a lock adjust, a hinge
adjustment. He doesn't want to take two guys off making gates and CUSTOM
work to go do this.
I, on the other hand, want to go do this light work. Only thing I have to
do is get a Lincoln 140 MIG so I can merely plug into the homeowner's 110
power supply. Looks like I may have a good referral source, and as this is
normal wear and tear and kids swinging on the gates kinds of fixups, it
comes under hourly. We're going to talk again in a couple of days.
Steve |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| SteveB... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 12:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Grant Erwin" <grant at (no spam) NOSPAMkirkland.net> wrote in message
news:0JOUj.376$be.348 at (no spam) trndny02...
Quote: SteveB wrote:
"Grant Erwin" <grant at (no spam) NOSPAMkirkland.net> wrote in message
news:dFJUj.296$Nf.194 at (no spam) trndny03...
Just use it to run your grinders, which are very happy running on DC.
Grant
RoyJ wrote:
According to page 4 of ONE of the SA-200manuals (not sure which one you
have)
http://content.lincolnelectric.com//pdfs/products/navigator/im/IM276.pdf
the 115 volt output is DC, so a wire feed with definitely NOT work. As
in fry the wire feed welder instantly kind of not work.
Worse than that, it indicates that there is no real overload protection
other than the circuit board. Not a good thing.
Talked to the local artisan today. A lot of his work is approaching 5
years of age, and occasionally needs a tweak, a lock adjust, a hinge
adjustment. He doesn't want to take two guys off making gates and CUSTOM
work to go do this.
I, on the other hand, want to go do this light work. Only thing I have
to do is get a Lincoln 140 MIG so I can merely plug into the homeowner's
110 power supply. Looks like I may have a good referral source, and as
this is normal wear and tear and kids swinging on the gates kinds of
fixups, it comes under hourly. We're going to talk again in a couple of
days.
Steve
And your question is .. ??
Who put sand in your Granola?
Steve |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Private... |
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:05 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"SteveB" <toquerville,utah at (no spam) zionvistas> wrote in message
news:uip7f5-n5l.ln1 at (no spam) news.infowest.com...
Quote: I know I already used one coupon this month, so sue me.
I bought an old SA 200 welder with a 1.75 kw rated plug for tools. This
is stated in the Lincoln download manual. The current available is 15
amps, per manual.
I am interested if I can run a 110v. Lincoln 140 MIG on that circuit. The
required amperage at FULL LOAD is 20 amps. I do not see any breakers on
the SA 200, so don't know what type of protection they have on there if a
larger than acceptable load is put on that circuit. Also, there are two
plugs on the machine. Any way to wire the two together to up the
amperage? (maybe that's the third dumb question ...........)
Ask Lincoln, if your SA200 is an approved power source for the Lincoln 140
MIG. As always, the manufacturer (NOT Usenet) is the definitive source for
information regarding their products.
Ask Lincoln for their recommendations for small wire feeders approved for
use
with your welder.
Quote: Can I just use a tester and check the voltage and amperage on those plugs
with the machine running? For the electricital whizzes out there, what
does 1.75 kw convert to in layman's terms?
Checking Volts is very simple, but measuring Amps is a lot more complicated.
As per Ohm's Law,
Watts = V*A
Amps = Watts/Volts
1750/120V=14.58amps
1750/115V=15.21amps
Put a multimeter on the power outlet and measure the actual voltage (DC), I
suspect this will vary with generator RPM.
Google 'Ohm's Law'
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=Ohm%27s+Law&btnG=Google+Search&meta=
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm's_law
Google 'Watt'
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=WATT&btnG=Search&meta=
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=WATT&btnG=Search&meta=
Do you detect a pattern here?
Quote: Could I use this intermittently on a very short duty cycle for wrought
iron repairs, or even look for a smaller machine that has less current
draw? Is there such a thing? This would be for small .065" tubing
repairs.
If absolutely necessary, I can use the DC part of the welder and 3/32"
6011 DCSP.
You have commented previously on your use of 6011 with DCSP. I have (as
tactfully as possible) suggested that NONE of my electrode manufacturer's
electrode manuals suggest or approve of running 6011 on DCSP, YMMV. You may
have a source for electrodes from a manufacturer who does approve of their
use with DCSP or as I like to say, YMMV. We all do what ever works, and
this does occasionally cause us to modify approved procedures, but ONLY
when working on non-critical or work without a specified or required
procedure. At all times the manufacturer's recommendations are your best
guide as they have tested their products extensively and know what
procedures yield satisfactory results, and they have every motivation to
recommend their products for as wide a range of usage as possible.
I would recommend that you obtain a 'welding electrode guide' from your
welding supplies dealer. These guides are normally available free, I often
use the 'Welding electrode and wire selector guide' from Liquid Air. These
guides are full of handy information and recommendations and are a great aid
with both common and specialized electrodes. IMHO an electrode guide
(available free from industrial electrode suppliers) and a steel data book
(available free from most industrial steel suppliers) are essential items in
every weldor's tool kit.
If you wish to limit penetration or burn-through I would suggest you use
6013 (3/32 or 5/64) which is approved for use on 'DC either polarity', IMHO
you will have better results running xx10 on your machine as xx11 is really
designed for AC, (but is approved for DCRP, and some weldors do have good
results with this).
Quote: "...the man who really counts in the world is the doer, not the mere
critic-the man who actually does the work, even if roughly and
imperfectly, not the man who only talks or writes about how it ought to be
done." Theodore Roosevelt 1891
The following comments are OT and IMHO,
Teddy Roosevelt was not a weldor OR a tradesman. He lived in a time where
technology was very limited and manufacturer's testing and support (and
warranty) was almost non-existent. I do not totally disagree with his
sentiment, but IMHO it provides little workable guidance regarding today's
complex engineering and science. In today's world we routinely work with
large loads and complex machinery that Teddy never could have imagined and
where failure will be catastrophic for both persons and property. IIRC
Teddy's greatest claim to fame (with the support of W.R Hearst's yellow
journalism) was the incorrect attribution of a failure of a pressure boiler
on the ship the Maine. Perhaps if Teddy had demanded better quality
engineering and maintenance he would have not had an excuse to wage a war of
aggression on an innocent country. The similarities with today are striking
where we find Popular Mechanics (a Hearst publication) crusading in a
similar manner to falsely explain current events that are similarly being
used to
justify wars of aggression and occupation.
Good luck, YMMV |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Private... |
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 3:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"SteveB" <toquerville,utah at (no spam) zionvistas> wrote in message
news:hu4hf5-vil2.ln1 at (no spam) news.infowest.com...
Quote:
"Private" <please at (no spam) dont.bother> wrote
If absolutely necessary, I can use the DC part of the welder and 3/32"
6011 DCSP.
You have commented previously on your use of 6011 with DCSP. I have (as
tactfully as possible) suggested that NONE of my electrode manufacturer's
electrode manuals suggest or approve of running 6011 on DCSP, YMMV. You
may
have a source for electrodes from a manufacturer who does approve of
their
use with DCSP or as I like to say, YMMV. We all do what ever works, and
this does occasionally cause us to modify approved procedures, but ONLY
when working on non-critical or work without a specified or required
procedure. At all times the manufacturer's recommendations are your best
guide as they have tested their products extensively and know what
procedures yield satisfactory results, and they have every motivation to
recommend their products for as wide a range of usage as possible.
I bought a Miller Thunderbolt once. I had a variety of rods. I was
looking for something that I could use in the field to repair weld
ornamental metal, mostly fences and gates. I put some tubing together,
and tried the small 6011. When I tried it with the stinger negative, it
would allow me to put down very small puddles and whip the rod, or if I
turned the current low enough, to make a continuous weld without burning
through. Very slight rod motions, very short arc, and very small puddles,
and as soon as one formed, whip out of it.
I do know that the rod is not RECOMMENDED for that polarity, but for THAT
specific application, it works great. I used it for years in the field,
and amazed a lot of people who said small ornamental tubing had to be
wirefed, as it could not be rod welded. Over the years, I have also been
amazed at the number of people who swear that the rod just plain will not
burn in that configuration. I do not know about anything larger than the
3/32" rod, and possibly the bigger ones won't do it. Maybe there's just
the right circumstances for that small one to work.
Sometimes if you don't know what you're doing, it's a little easier, as
not so much space is taken up in the brain with facts and absolutes. Or,
at least, I have found this to be true for me. I do know that a lot of
processes and inventions (the vulcanization of rubber for one) were the
results of pure accidents, carelessness, or trying something that everyone
said would NOT work.
If you ever get a chance, try it. You may be surprised. Make it just hot
enough to keep an arc.
Steve
Quote: We all do what ever works, and
this does occasionally cause us to modify approved procedures, but ONLY
when working on non-critical or work without a specified or required
procedure.
There is lots of work done using non standard procedures, but it is often
wise to keep this usage to yourself. A local mine company used to demand
their welders pass a pipe test using a 7018 (DCSP) root in order to receive
the top pay rate. A new weldor reported that when he used his own 6010s for
the test, that the inspector told him that (the quite different appearance
of the xx10 root) was the best root that he had ever seen and that it was
very unusual for anyone to pass this test (which was the reason the company
used it, as they thought it saved them money on wages).
There are also approved procedures calling for use of a 7018 DCSP root pass
on structural plate. This procedure is not normally referenced by the
manufacturer's electrode guide but if the responsible engineer has specified
this procedure then its use is required and approved. It is similar to a
Doctor prescribing drugs for 'off label' use. A plain dumb weldor should be
very careful about using non-approved procedures as this can expose them to
expensive issues of liability and failed quality control.
Ornamental iron, fences and gates certainly fall into the 'non-critical'
classification. Your technique as described seems correct and the results
speak for themselves. I suspect that the same technique would yield even
better results with 6013 but YMMV, I would be interested in your comparison
report. I do very little work with AC welders and have not used much 6011.
Some weldors prefer 6011 even on DC, but most have greater trust in xx10 to
pass x-ray testing and almost all jobs specify xx10.
The high quality of your SA200 will give you excellent control at very low
power settings, and you may find you like it for very small rods and as a
TIG power source (except for aluminum, which is possible with proper flux
but is less desirable than AC) particularly if you can find (or build) a
high freq unit.
Good luck, YMMV |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| SteveB... |
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 3:09 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Private" <please at (no spam) dont.bother> wrote
Quote: If absolutely necessary, I can use the DC part of the welder and 3/32"
6011 DCSP.
You have commented previously on your use of 6011 with DCSP. I have (as
tactfully as possible) suggested that NONE of my electrode manufacturer's
electrode manuals suggest or approve of running 6011 on DCSP, YMMV. You
may
have a source for electrodes from a manufacturer who does approve of their
use with DCSP or as I like to say, YMMV. We all do what ever works, and
this does occasionally cause us to modify approved procedures, but ONLY
when working on non-critical or work without a specified or required
procedure. At all times the manufacturer's recommendations are your best
guide as they have tested their products extensively and know what
procedures yield satisfactory results, and they have every motivation to
recommend their products for as wide a range of usage as possible.
I bought a Miller Thunderbolt once. I had a variety of rods. I was looking
for something that I could use in the field to repair weld ornamental metal,
mostly fences and gates. I put some tubing together, and tried the small
6011. When I tried it with the stinger negative, it would allow me to put
down very small puddles and whip the rod, or if I turned the current low
enough, to make a continuous weld without burning through. Very slight rod
motions, very short arc, and very small puddles, and as soon as one formed,
whip out of it.
I do know that the rod is not RECOMMENDED for that polarity, but for THAT
specific application, it works great. I used it for years in the field, and
amazed a lot of people who said small ornamental tubing had to be wirefed,
as it could not be rod welded. Over the years, I have also been amazed at
the number of people who swear that the rod just plain will not burn in that
configuration. I do not know about anything larger than the 3/32" rod, and
possibly the bigger ones won't do it. Maybe there's just the right
circumstances for that small one to work.
Sometimes if you don't know what you're doing, it's a little easier, as not
so much space is taken up in the brain with facts and absolutes. Or, at
least, I have found this to be true for me. I do know that a lot of
processes and inventions (the vulcanization of rubber for one) were the
results of pure accidents, carelessness, or trying something that everyone
said would NOT work.
If you ever get a chance, try it. You may be surprised. Make it just hot
enough to keep an arc.
Steve |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| SteveB... |
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 4:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"SteveB" <toquerville,utah at (no spam) zionvistas> wrote
Quote: If you ever get a chance, try it. You may be surprised. Make it just hot
enough to keep an arc.
Steve
I can take two pieces of 1" square .065" tubing and butt weld them together
end to end. I don't THINK I can do it, I KNOW I can because I've done it
many times to replace a piece of rusted out tubing. I haven't tried it with
the SA 200 yet, but know I can do it with a Thunderbolt. I will have to buy
some small 6011 here soon. When I get it, I'll try it on the SA 200, and if
the welder will do it, I'll post you a picture on Flickr.
Steve |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| RoyJ... |
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 5:25 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
I do know that the rod is not RECOMMENDED for that polarity, but for THAT
specific application, it works great.
http://content.lincolnelectric.com/pdfs/products/literature/c210.pdf
page 8 shows Lincoln 6011 listed for AC, DC+ and DC- (preferred in that
order)
I used it for years in the field, and
Quote: amazed a lot of people who said small ornamental tubing had to be wirefed,
as it could not be rod welded.
DC and small rod can do wonders on ornamental tube. The big bonus on
wirefeed is that you don't have to chip slag but otherwise the stick
works fine. I actually prefer it for poor fitup work, much better
control of temp and puddle. Changing the polarity will move the heat
around, may work better for certain work.
But be sure to try some decent 6013 on new work, AC is fine, DC is
smoother with less slag. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu May 15, 2008 11:28 am
|
|