In article
0f3f30b8-a2e9-43b2-b394-d02c40f19... at (no spam) 27g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
sir.jean-paul.turc... at (no spam) neuf.fr wrote:
On 8 mai, 21:02, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
I'm looking at this image of Antarctica at wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:AntarcticaRockSurface.jpg
Supposed to be the rocks under the ice.
Very interesting and thank you for that link... the areas in blue in
that X-ray satellite shots reconstituted in a whole South Pole
arrangement are in fact representing melt water under the
Inlandsis ...
You're making shit up.
The map was made from data
fromhttp://www.antarctica.ac.uk
"Own model based on data provided by BEDMAP Consortium, available
athttp://www.antarctica.ac.uk/aedc/bedmap/download/"
Here's a map from that site:http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/about_antarctica/geography/maps/Misc%209%...
DMAP.jpg
Some of the fresh water seas & seas is the correct name
indeed were detected last year by a team from the Colorado University
Is that Colorado State at Fort Collins, Colorado University Boulder, or
University of Colorado Denver? Maybe you mean UCLA (University of
Colorado between Lawrence and Arapahoe)?
& only as recently as last month an Australian Survey ship on its way
back from an Antarctica voyage with an International scientific team
onboard admitted a very worrying softening of sea water there.
Obviously the inland melt is reaching the sea and I have personally
counted over 50 drainage lines running through thousand of miles from
the 9,301 ft high Transantarctic Mountains.
"Personally"? When were you there?
I have said on some other post that my estimate for sea rise that very
Xmas in Australia was 1 m... and all pointers confirming that estimate
indeed
How high will the sea level rise be on the rest of the planet?
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.