Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Psychology - Theory Forum  »  Odd Actions by Mads/Normals?
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Kumar
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:57 pm
Guest
Hello,

Just thinking & observing:-

Can odd actions by mad people and normal looking people be
opposing(for cure and for disease rsptly,) in view of "Newtons third
law of motion i.e. for every action there is an equal and opposite
reaction"?

I observed that few people in morning excecising programme formed
"laughter club" practicing odd/mad type of activities/excecises and
were quite happy & healthful looking. I also tried & felt quite
enjoying/relaxing. So my above question seemss to have some sense.:)

Best wishes.
Kumar
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 1:34 am
Guest
On Apr 14, 8:57 am, Kumar <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Hello,

Just thinking & observing:-

Can odd actions by mad people and normal looking people be
opposing(for cure and for disease rsptly,) in view of "Newtons third
law of motion i.e. for every action there is an equal and opposite
reaction"?

I observed that few people in morning excecising programme formed
"laughter club" practicing odd/mad type of activities/excecises and
were quite happy & healthful looking. I also tried & felt quite
enjoying/relaxing. So my above question seemss to have some sense.:)

Best wishes.

Can odd actions by mad people bring some relief or healing to them?
Randy Poe
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:15 am
Guest
On Apr 13, 11:57 pm, Kumar <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Hello,

Just thinking & observing:-

Do you find these observations occur after you have had
four or five glasses of wine?

Quote:
Can odd actions by mad people and normal looking people be
opposing(for cure and for disease rsptly,) in view of "Newtons third
law of motion i.e. for every action there is an equal and opposite
reaction"?

No, the "actions" in Newton's Third Law has nothing to do with
"odd actions of people". It is a law of motion, as you note in the
title you give it. It has a specific physical meaning.

- Randy
tadchem
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:51 am
Guest
On Apr 13, 11:57 pm, Kumar <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Hello,

Just thinking & observing:-

Can odd actions by mad people and normal looking people be
opposing(for cure and for disease rsptly,) in view of "Newtons third
law of motion i.e. for every action there is an equal and opposite
reaction"?

People, whether 'mad' or 'normal looking', must obey the laws of
physics at all times. The physical universe tolerates no violations
of its laws.

Quote:
I observed that few people in morning excecising programme formed
"laughter club" practicing odd/mad type of activities/excecises and
were quite happy & healthful looking. I also tried & felt quite
enjoying/relaxing. So my above question seemss to have some sense.Smile

"Seeming" to make sense is no substitute for quantitative empirical
validation.

You are arguing by analogy - an especially inappropriate analogy.

"Analogies are like ropes; they tie things together well, but you
won't get very far if you try to push them." - Thaddeus Stout

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

> Best wishes.
Kumar
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:42 pm
Guest
On Apr 15, 7:15 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 13, 11:57 pm, Kumar <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

Just thinking & observing:-

Do you find these observations occur after you have had
four or five glasses of wine?
Odd looking actions can occur but may or may not be similar.
Can odd actions by mad people and normal looking people be
opposing(for cure and for disease rsptly,) in view of "Newtons third
law of motion i.e. for every action there is an equal and opposite
reaction"?

No, the "actions" in Newton's Third Law has nothing to do with
"odd actions of people". It is a law of motion, as you note in the
title you give it. It has a specific physical meaning.

               - Randy

Odd Actions/activities can odd motions dependant.
Kumar
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:46 pm
Guest
On Apr 15, 11:51 pm, tadchem <tadc...@comcast.net> wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 13, 11:57 pm, Kumar <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

Just thinking & observing:-

Can odd actions by mad people and normal looking people be
opposing(for cure and for disease rsptly,) in view of "Newtons third
law of motion i.e. for every action there is an equal and opposite
reaction"?

People, whether 'mad' or 'normal looking', must obey the laws of
physics at all times.  The physical universe tolerates no violations
of its laws.
Law may mean--valid universely. Still do you agree that human actions

can cause equal & opposing reactions?
Quote:
I observed that few people in morning excecising programme formed
"laughter club" practicing odd/mad type of activities/excecises and
were quite happy & healthful looking. I also tried & felt quite
enjoying/relaxing. So my above question seemss to have some sense.:)

"Seeming" to make sense is no substitute for quantitative empirical
validation.

You are arguing by analogy - an especially inappropriate analogy.

"Analogies are like ropes; they tie things together well, but you
won't get very far if you try to push them." - Thaddeus Stout

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA



Best wishes.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

??
tadchem
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 3:22 pm
Guest
On Apr 15, 10:46 pm, Kumar <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 15, 11:51 pm, tadchem <tadc...@comcast.net> wrote:> On Apr 13, 11:57 pm, Kumar <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

Just thinking & observing:-

Can odd actions by mad people and normal looking people be
opposing(for cure and for disease rsptly,) in view of "Newtons third
law of motion i.e. for every action there is an equal and opposite
reaction"?

People, whether 'mad' or 'normal looking', must obey the laws of
physics at all times. The physical universe tolerates no violations
of its laws.

Law may mean--valid universely.

In physical science, that is exactly what "law" means - universally
valid. Such is one interpretation (corrolary, if you prefer) of the
Principle of Relativity.

Quote:
Still do you agree that human actions
can cause equal & opposing reactions?

<snip>

Don't ask me to validate your anthropomorphic fantasy. The use of the
words "actions" and "reactions" in the context of human activity does
not correlate to their use in physics. To attempt such a misuse is a
well recognized fallacy of informal logic known as "equivocation":

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#equivocation

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
Kumar
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:49 pm
Guest
On Apr 17, 6:22 am, tadchem <tadc...@comcast.net> wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 15, 10:46 pm, Kumar <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote:





On Apr 15, 11:51 pm, tadchem <tadc...@comcast.net> wrote:> On Apr 13, 11:57 pm, Kumar <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

Just thinking & observing:-

Can odd actions by mad people and normal looking people be
opposing(for cure and for disease rsptly,) in view of "Newtons third
law of motion i.e. for every action there is an equal and opposite
reaction"?

People, whether 'mad' or 'normal looking', must obey the laws of
physics at all times.  The physical universe tolerates no violations
of its laws.

Law may mean--valid universely.

In physical science, that is exactly what "law" means - universally
valid.  Such is one interpretation (corrolary, if you prefer) of the
Principle of Relativity.

Still do you agree that human actions
can cause equal & opposing reactions?

snip

Don't ask me to validate your anthropomorphic fantasy.  The use of the
words "actions" and "reactions" in the context of human activity does
not correlate to their use in physics.  To attempt such a misuse is a
well recognized fallacy of informal logic known as "equivocation":

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#equivocation

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Throwing a ball towards a wall & catching it back, is also a human
action & reaction. If law, it should also apply to humams actions/
motions.
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:32 am