Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Geology Forum  »  Is the earth hollow?
Page 8 of 8    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Author Message
sir.jean-paul.turcaudbot
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:28 am
Guest
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:14:29 +1000, Carole wrote:

Quote:
"peter" <ee@we.mm> wrote in message
news:48172bf2$0$57233$dbd4f001@news.wanadoo.nl...
Carole schreef:







tell me,how HOT is it only a few miles deep?

There is a lot of books written on this topic. What happens is that as
you go deep into the earth, there is a glow which gradually becomes
brighter. Its got something to do with the sun's rays which penetrate
the solid earth. They don't just disappear but change form into a glow
without the harmful radiation which is on the earth's surface.

That is very interesting indeed. However...

Even if there was is a glow the deeper into the earth you go, it is
unlikely to be radiation from the sun. It is much more likely that this
is radiation from their plasma reactor network.


Quote:
and how HOT will it be at 100 miles deep? and where does lava come
from?

There is another theory on vulcanos, how they are formed. What happens
is that huge underground lakes gradually fill then spill their contents
onto pockets of sulphur which causes heat and which then discharges
through cracks in the earth.
You can read about this in an online book called etidorpha (do a search)
-- excerpt follows.

Given that these underground lakes could easily be manipulated by them,
they show remarkable self restraint, otherwise there would be a lot more
volcanos in man's cities don't you think?

Quote:

I don't think the earth is hot underground.


There are several thermal zones. Some zones are too hot even for them
(this is probably where the idea of Hell comes from). The areas used for
commerce and agriculture are varied just like on the surface. There are
tropical zones and temperate zones and deserts.

WELLDONE! Yep!
Sunny
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:31 pm
Guest
"Carole" <hubbca@iimetro.com.au> wrote in message
news:48182a63$0$9714$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
| There is a lot of books written on this topic. What happens is that as
you
| go deep into the earth, there is a glow which gradually becomes
brighter.
| Its got something to do with the sun's rays which penetrate the solid
earth.
| They don't just disappear but change form into a glow without the
harmful
| radiation which is on the earth's surface.

The DARK SUCKER THEORY...
With humility and deepest apologies to Buzz Hoffman
http://www.cactusairforce.org/page%20buzz.htm

So you've looked at lights and light bulbs all your life
and you never really understood them or how they work.
Light bulbs don't EMIT light...
Light bulbs, and the Sun for that matter, SUCK DARK.
They suck in all the darkness around them, and allow you to see.
When the Sun "shines" it's really sucking a whole lot of
darkness from the surrounding space. How do we know this?
Think of the last time you entered a dark room and turned on
the Light. See how quickly all the DARKNESS got sucked into
the Bulb? Go do it now.
Then turn the light (actually Dark sucker) off ...
See how all the dark rushes back out of it....See it???
Now just where does the darkness go when it's sucked into
the Light suckers, you ask?
Well, ever notice how the "juice" that runs the dark suckers
comes from powerplants? Powerplants are often located at
Dams on rivers and what do we find at the bottom of the river?
DARKNESS....tons and tons of the stuff.
So, you turn on the Dark sucker, it sucks the DARK into the line,
it goes along the power poles, to the generators at the Dam and
down into the bottom of the river. From there, the DARK flows
out to SEA... and just what do we encounter deep in the oceans?
DARKNESS....GOBs and GOBS of the stuff....DARK everywhere.
Now, the Native Indians understood this. How do we know?
You ever see how in a movie the Indians were in their canoes?
Just what were they doing in those canoes when you saw them..
PADDLING...RIGHT? Paddling all the DARK down the river and
into the ocean. Ever pull off the road on a dark night with
your head lights still on? When you turn to the back of the car,
it's DARK, why??
Because the headlights are NOT SUCKING the dark in that direction.
If you turn back towards the front, you will see, Clearly,
that they are sucking a lotof DARK out in front of the car.
That's how it works. The Car's DARK SUCKERS, suck the DARK from
a portion of the road in front of you..voilla....see how it works?
BLACK HOLES....nah....not on your life, YOU GUESSED IT...
DARK EMITTERS...yup... now you see it don't ya?
Go out in the Mountains on a dark clear spring night and take your
Flash light with you. Now, turn on your portable DARK SUCKER,
watch how it sucks DARK from a particular direction. Now, put your
hand over the end of the thing...SEE?? It STOPS sucking DARK right
away. Pull your hand away, and there it goes again, sucking DARK.
So what happens when the Flash light (portable DARK SUCKER)
don't work no more? The batteries are FILLED UP WITH DARK and
there is no room so you have to get a fresh set to suck more DARK
....simple...SEE?
Well, that's about it, but you may wonder why so many people
are confused and so incorrect in referring to these things as LIGHTS?
Well, it's probably because of language.
Can you imagine poems where....
"The Full Moon SUCKED DARK on the glassy smooth surface of the Alpine
Lake..."
(The Full Moon Shined down on the glassy smooth surface of the Alpine
Lake..."
---OR---
"I'd like to SPRAY SOME DARK SUCKING on that mystery"
("I'd like to shed some light on that mystery")
So, SCIENCE took a back seat to POETRY, and we've been mis-labeling these
devices ever since.
But now, you and I know the truth...
Sunny
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:34 pm
Guest
"Carole" <hubbca@iimetro.com.au> wrote in message
news:48183586$0$9730$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
|
| <sir.jpturcaud@neuf.fr> wrote in message
|
news:bc229605-6813-48cf-9664-48247bf1ec64@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
| > On 28 avr, 14:05, "Carole" <hub...@iimetro.com.au> wrote:
| > > "Carole" <hub...@iimetro.com.au> wrote in message
| >
| > Admiral Byrd was lured or abducted as you wish, and relating his
| > experience believed it occured right where he was at the time... many
| > examples of such.
|
| I don't follow what you mean by Admiral Byrd being abducted.
| Do you mean he was abducted and implanted with these ideas?

He was "abducted" by Turcauds rubber room attendant, to be used as an
enema test dummy.
Guest
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:35 pm
Dear Carole,

Here is a copy for your information of a comment of mine to a Russian
Journal
The Hollow Earth or the Flat Earth or the Geostationary Earth etc are
just some of the concepts considered as valid by some people, but you
must remember that there is only one Truth, and such Truth must be in
phase with all disciplines either in Physics, Engineering , History,
Ethnology.
The Hollow Earth theory which you defend does not correspond to such
synthetic approach and must be seen as ludicrous as the Glaciations,
Paleo-Glacial Climates, Tectonic Plates wandering, Hot Spots,
Mountains building through by crust crumpling etc which are the
official views of present Geology.
Best jp
***************************

Y/ref http://www.russia-ic.com/news/show/6259/

Your article : How to Predict Earthquakes 29.04.2008

Russian scientists developed an algorithm, which describes formation
of earthquakes and predicts them.

Russian seismologists predict a huge earthquake to happen before
2018. The epicentre has five possible locations: on the western border
between the USA and Canada, Chili, Kashmir, Sumatra and the Indian
ocean near the Andaman Islands.

Russian seismologists found that most powerful earthquakes had
clear repeating pattern with power peaking in the end of the cycle.
You can read more about Russian discovery in the “New Scientist”
magazine.

Source: New Scientist

La Rochelle 1st of Mai 2008

Sirs,

I am afraid that algorithms of any kind will not give any practical
anticipation to any major quakes & the time windows ( up to 2018 ) +
the whole Earth in fact as possible location confirm here that Russian
scientists as well as others have not the slightest clue on the cause
of Earthquakes & Volcanism.
One notable element further are the dogmas underlying present Geology
such as the "creation" of Earth on present orbit and stability of such
anticipated presently with projection into the uncharted future with
both rotation & revolution resulting from acquired inertia. The views
of the official Academics are so infantile that it is no wonder that
without any exception they are all completely sterile in term not only
of Mining discoveries but as well on the understanding of the genesis
of minerals & their concentrations particularly Iron & Manganese
oxides. The reality of our Earth history is not fairy tale with
Glaciations idiocies, iso-static rebound, Tectonics Plates wandering &
banging, Mountains crumpling, Erosion of intrusive & extrusive rock
formations by water etc it is a coherent OPEN system and indeed not a
CLOSE one as is conceived now.
On the base of the True Geology arcane where Planetary Expansion ( EE
as the local aspect) follows lines of longitudes, I estimate the most
likely locations of major 7.5 + killers quakes are presently on the
Rift especially at risk being the Aswan dam, Ankara & Sydney

Yours faithfully

Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer
Discoverer of Telfer, Nifty & Kintyre Mines in the Great Sandy Desert
Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant
Bus ph + 33 6 50 17 14 64
Founder of the True Geology

~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One never Forgiven ~
BradGuth
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:21 pm
Guest
On Apr 27, 5:58 pm, Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@inferNOnoSPAMsoft.com>
wrote:
Quote:
In article
2d245ea4-7873-4bdb-b203-017ccb3ab...@w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,



BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 26, 8:41 pm, Skywise <i...@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:
Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@inferNOnoSPAMsoft.com> wrote
innews:timberwoof.spam-0837BD.13312426042008@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net:

I think that all these rumors about a conspiracy are a conspiracy.
There's no conspiracy. There's just this secret committee that sits
around and makes up silly ideas like hollow earth, expanding earth, and
hollow expanding earth and propagates them to their minions so they in
turn can pretend they're "in the know" about super secret stuff that
nobody knows anything about. Then they put it all on the Interweb so
everyone can read all this secret knowledge.

Now THAT is a theory I can support!

Brian
--http://www.skywise711.com-Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ:http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions":http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

It's the traditional form of a well established brown-nosed clownism
theory, of artificially packing the crowd and otherwise stacking the
deck in your favor.

This method has worked like a charm for thousands of years, and it's
still a No.1 priority method used to day by most governments,
corporations and of their faith-basted puppeteers.

Most topics by far are in fact entirely bogus, as well as bogus
contributed to and bogus otherwise as having been created and
sustained along by way of those having bogus Usenet/Group IDs.

Perhaps as much as 99.9% of Usenet/Groups is bogus, as fully intended
by way of DARPA and other cloak and dagger policy.

The hollow earth topic is bogus.

No one from DARPA has ever contacted me to tell me to try to hush your
silly little theories. One doesn't need a conspiracy theory to show that
they're silly and that anyone who believes them is a little off his
rocker.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.

As expected, very DARPA of yourself.
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:23 pm
Guest
On Apr 28, 9:03 am, Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@inferNOnoSPAMsoft.com>
wrote:
Quote:
In article
90cea4e9-8a12-47f2-953b-8919140f4...@r9g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,







BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 27, 5:55 pm, Timberwoof
timberwoof.s...@inferNOnoSPAMsoft.com> wrote:
In article
4b07d497-e69a-4272-a620-1e084ec9b...@n1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>,

BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 26, 7:21 pm, "Peter Webb"
I might also add that we know the mass of the earth because we
can measure the force of gravity on the earth's surface and in
space (through the orbits of satellites). This puts the average
density of the earth at about (from memory) about 5 tonnes per
cubic meter. If this was just a shell, the earth would have to
be made of a material unknown to science but many times heavier
than Lead or Uranium.

A thick enough inner sphere of magnetic thorium and iron would
more than do the trick, whereas an inner low gravity realm of
perhaps 1280 km diameter (roughly 10% Earth diameter) wouldn't be
so easily detected, if ever.

Why does it have to be magnetic?

That was just a swag, because something within Earth seems magnetic,
and that might as will be this interior sphere of thorium and iron.

Now the Earth is hollow and there's a sphere of thorium and iron in
there.

How do you explain the fact that seismic waves don't bounce off the
inner surface and come right back? How do you explain that seismic
waves don't travel through magma the same way as they would through
"magnetic thorium and iron"? How do you explain the wandering
magnetic poles? How do you think the Earth was formed? How do you
reconcile this with your earlier support for an expanding earth?

Why do you keep coming up with so many loaded questions?

Do you mean, "Why do you keep coming back with so many questions that
blow irreparable holes in my flimsy hypothesis"?

If I were half as smart as yourself, instead of asking such obviously
loaded questions, instead I'd be sharing my expertise that's
unsurpassed by any known standard.

Well, you are half as smart as me. And instead of asking skeptical
questions, you're ready to swallow any wacky theory that comes your
way.

BTW, why is Usenet/groups or yourself intentionally running key words
together with other words (such as "magneticthoriumand") so that a
typical internet 'search for' _magnetic_ thorium wouldn't function?
. - Brad Guth

I don't know. You just wrote it like that; I didn't.

That's very DARPA, as usual.
.. - BG
sir.jean-paul.turcaudbot
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 12:56 am
Guest
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:14:47 -0700, Timberwoof wrote:


Quote:

Because they'd fall apart otherwise.

Earth has not yet collapsed yet, which proves that hollow planets do not
readily fall apart.

Quote:

So build your own network of seismometers and prove it.

It is pointless. The planet's siesmic metrics are spoofed, so they cannot
be relied on.


Quote:
Pick any source of satellite photos you want.

Do you think it is possible to get unretouched satellite photos? I don't
think so. This is basic conspiracy 101 stuff - sheesh.

WELLDONE! Yep!
Bob Hawke
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 7:02 pm
Guest
"sir.jean-paul.turcaudbot" <sir.jean-paul.turcaudbot@neuf.fr> wrote in
message news:aYcSj.6611$ko5.2759@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Quote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:14:47 -0700, Timberwoof wrote:



Because they'd fall apart otherwise.

Earth has not yet collapsed yet, which proves that hollow planets do not
readily fall apart.


So build your own network of seismometers and prove it.

It is pointless. The planet's siesmic metrics are spoofed, so they cannot
be relied on.


Pick any source of satellite photos you want.

Do you think it is possible to get unretouched satellite photos? I don't
think so. This is basic conspiracy 101 stuff - sheesh.

WELLDONE! Yep!


Le-Turd asks -
Is the earth hollow?

Answer - NOPE! - but your head is Le-Turd.

You have obviously been speaking to Horus again at the bottom of your
garden - haven't you Le-Turd?
 
Page 8 of 8    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri May 16, 2008 11:25 pm