A candidate must serve the locals getting started, but later, when he
is humoring a national audience, the old local panderings may come
back to bite him on the fanny.

The transition from local to national isn't impossible but it does
require some planning.

It's very clear now that Obama wasn't planning.  This is why the media
were pumping Obama.  He would be easy to dump.

Either Obama was misrepresenting himself in Chicago or he is
misrepresenting himself now.

Or both.

There is no way around that truth.

A candidate must serve the locals getting started, but later, when he
is humoring a national audience, the old local panderings may come
back to bite him on the fanny.

The transition from local to national isn't impossible but it does
require some planning.

It's very clear now that Obama wasn't planning. �This is why the media
were pumping Obama. �He would be easy to dump.

Either Obama was misrepresenting himself in Chicago or he is
misrepresenting himself now.

Or both.

There is no way around that truth.

Except if he gets more delegate and superdelegate votes.

Unless even
if he wins the media can convince us that it didn't really happen and
he is not really the Democrat candidate.

Maybe they could get us to
ignore the guy the party says is the candidate if he does win,

you
know media can fool you guys pretty good

A candidate must serve the locals getting started, but later, when he
is humoring a national audience, the old local panderings may come
back to bite him on the fanny.

The transition from local to national isn't impossible but it does
require some planning.

It's very clear now that Obama wasn't planning. This is why the media
were pumping Obama. He would be easy to dump.

Either Obama was misrepresenting himself in Chicago or he is
misrepresenting himself now.

Or both.

There is no way around that truth.


Bret Cahill

"Bret Cahill" <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:c6e1aef5-3f75-453e-8fc2-d01d9fd833c5@y22g2000prd.googlegroups.com...





A candidate must serve the locals getting started, but later, when he
is humoring a national audience, the old local panderings may come
back to bite him on the fanny.

The transition from local to national isn't impossible but it does
require some planning.

It's very clear now that Obama wasn't planning.  This is why the media
were pumping Obama.  He would be easy to dump.

Either Obama was misrepresenting himself in Chicago or he is
misrepresenting himself now.

Or both.

There is no way around that truth.

Bret Cahill

Bret, america isn't ready for an Obama, and it's got nothing to do with him
being coloured.

In recent history there's been 2 Presidents with incredibly wise intellects.
Kennedy and Clinton. The rest run a very distant second last to Bush II at
the tail.

Besides their mental abilities both Kennedy and Clinton had two other really
good qualities. Natural leadership skills, and a heart to balance the mind..

Obama is the only person I have seen pop up in US politics in recent times
that even comes close to these two. He hasn't been leading by accident, and
he isn't streets ahead of what people expected to achieve a year ago by
accident, it's called talent for the Job. Hilary is a dead loss, but if
America wants to go that road for the expereince, it's their choice.

fwiw McCain is old enough from a gone by day to have retired 15 years ago.

If Obama does get the nod, he'll beat McCain hands down. [ 55-45% ] If
Hillary wins the nomination she'll get caned and McCain will win by default.
She is not up to the job. Sorry, but that's how it looks to me.

All my opinion, fwiw, probably zilch. Not up to me to vote. You choose. A
Democrat or a Republican to win? - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On May 1, 10:14 am, "Sean" <waz...@bro.org> wrote:





"Bret Cahill" <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:c6e1aef5-3f75-453e-8fc2-d01d9fd833c5@y22g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

A candidate must serve the locals getting started, but later, when he
is humoring a national audience, the old local panderings may come
back to bite him on the fanny.

The transition from local to national isn't impossible but it does
require some planning.

It's very clear now that Obama wasn't planning.  This is why the media
were pumping Obama.  He would be easy to dump.

Either Obama was misrepresenting himself in Chicago or he is
misrepresenting himself now.

Or both.

There is no way around that truth.

Bret Cahill

Bret, america isn't ready for an Obama, and it's got nothing to do with him
being coloured.

In recent history there's been 2 Presidents with incredibly wise intellects.
Kennedy and Clinton. The rest run a very distant second last to Bush II at
the tail.

Besides their mental abilities both Kennedy and Clinton had two other really
good qualities. Natural leadership skills, and a heart to balance the mind.

Obama is the only person I have seen pop up in US politics in recent times
that even comes close to these two. He hasn't been leading by accident, and
he isn't streets ahead of what people expected to achieve a year ago by
accident, it's called talent for the Job. Hilary is a dead loss, but if
America wants to go that road for the expereince, it's their choice.

fwiw McCain is old enough from a gone by day to have retired 15 years ago.

If Obama does get the nod, he'll beat McCain hands down. [ 55-45% ] If
Hillary wins the nomination she'll get caned and McCain will win by default.
She is not up to the job. Sorry, but that's how it looks to me.

All my opinion, fwiw, probably zilch. Not up to me to vote. You choose. A
Democrat or a Republican to win? - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sean, I beg to differ.
I am shocked that you ascribe "incredibly wise intellects"  to Kennedy
and Clinton. In my view their political 'connections' or political
'smarts' were responsible for their elections. I see a total lack of
wisdom in their lack of respect for the Presidency (and  for the
'public for which it stands') when both indulged their sexual
peccadillos whilst in office.
Kennedy was cut short before he could prove himself. Clinton enjoyed
an unparalelled technological/economoic surge whilst he was in office
but has  proved to be an opportunist nonpariel! A grimy money grubber!
Hillary? Where would she be if she were not an ex-president's formal
bed fellow?
OBama? Is there realy some hope?
Zinnic

If Obama does get the nod,

he'll beat McCain hands down. [ 55-45% ]

If
Hillary wins the nomination she'll get caned and McCain will win by default.

She is not up to the job.

"Bret Cahill" <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:c6e1aef5-3f75-453e-8fc2-d01d9fd833c5@y22g2000prd.googlegroups.com...





A candidate must serve the locals getting started, but later, when he
is humoring a national audience, the old local panderings may come
back to bite him on the fanny.

The transition from local to national isn't impossible but it does
require some planning.

It's very clear now that Obama wasn't planning. This is why the media
were pumping Obama. He would be easy to dump.

Either Obama was misrepresenting himself in Chicago or he is
misrepresenting himself now.

Or both.

There is no way around that truth.

Bret Cahill

Bret, america isn't ready for an Obama, and it's got nothing to do with
him
being coloured.

In recent history there's been 2 Presidents with incredibly wise
intellects.
Kennedy and Clinton. The rest run a very distant second last to Bush II at
the tail.

Besides their mental abilities both Kennedy and Clinton had two other
really
good qualities. Natural leadership skills, and a heart to balance the
mind.

Obama is the only person I have seen pop up in US politics in recent times
that even comes close to these two. He hasn't been leading by accident,
and
he isn't streets ahead of what people expected to achieve a year ago by
accident, it's called talent for the Job. Hilary is a dead loss, but if
America wants to go that road for the expereince, it's their choice.

fwiw McCain is old enough from a gone by day to have retired 15 years ago.

If Obama does get the nod, he'll beat McCain hands down. [ 55-45% ] If
Hillary wins the nomination she'll get caned and McCain will win by
default.
She is not up to the job. Sorry, but that's how it looks to me.

All my opinion, fwiw, probably zilch. Not up to me to vote. You choose. A
Democrat or a Republican to win? - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If Obama does get the nod,

The media who were pumping him ("Obama, you are sooo beeeauuutiful")
will immediately start hyping madrasses as soon as he's nominated.

he'll beat McCain hands down. [ 55-45% ]

Obama polls the same as McBush and when a black candidate polls the
same as a white, that means he's 7 points behind on the secret
ballot. We saw this in the _Democratic_ primaries.

As it stands now, he'll probably lost the swing states and may even
lose the popular vote. There's even talk that Obama will put
California into play.

Obama was gush hyped by the very media who want us in Iraq for 100
years for that very reason..

Now this doesn't mean Obama will necessarily lose. The GOP is going
the way of the UK Tories and the Canadian Conservatives. The jihad
media may very well be too clever by half. Obama could be leading
McBush by 7 - 8 points by November.

If
Hillary wins the nomination she'll get caned and McCain will win by
default.

Hillary has all the big states and all the swing states. She's
already is ahead by 9 points and that is increasing. Even more
important is the fact that Repugs simply will not run against the
Clintons.

Hillary will win by 15 points.

She is not up to the job.

I don't agree with her on everything but hers is without question the
most issues oriented campaign in decades.


Bret Cahill