"JSH" <jstevh@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7e2ee5cf-e95e-4e0e-8580-8974677f1717@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Thanks for the replies so far. I will not reply to them all.


2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

Deliberately yes, in the one case where your paper was withdrawn because
of
errors, it is their responsibility to prevent substandard technical
content
(any paper with errors) from being published. No fraud involved, that is
too time consuming and complicated.

snip

but your paper did not get adequately
reviewed before publication, they should have rejected it earlier in the
process, and it was most likely the editor and crew did not have time to do
it.

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1. Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

3. Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

4. Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"? Does that mean
anything to you?

5. Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

6. Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

7. Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

Thank you.

James Harris

The NSA continually monitor internet traffic

Your welcome. Keep up the good work.

6.  Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

You are a super troll and you make very provacative statements - but
you are crazy!

How often can we talk to a nut from afar?

6.  Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

Why do so many people go to the circus?

Your paper was not part of the decision to close the math journal,
nor to remove papers from a website. It is all still public
information anyone can look at it in the library.

On 6 Mar, 02:31, JSH <jst...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1. Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

Unlikely.
At least, you doesn't appear to have shown them, and I doubt you may
do in the future.

2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

No.

3. Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

Loaded question: efficient factor methods would not cause major
security breaches.

And anyway, analysis of security problems of widespread computation
and communication systems are regularly published despite the fact
that such knowledge actually causes security breaches. (Think about
the WEP flaws or the countless critical vulnerabilities in Internet
Explorer and Outlook).

Research on efficient factoring is also published. See Shor's quantum
algorithm, for instance.

4. Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"? Does that mean
anything to you?

I'm not following your posts closely.

5. Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

You can post as much as you want, of course. But what's the point of
doing so?

6. Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

Because the love poking at you, I suppose.

7. Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

What do you mean by 'regardless of the source' ?

Thank you.

You're welcome.

1. Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

No. Though one cannot be sure. I just didn't see any such ideas from

2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

No, I don't think that this is possible. Since there are no valuable

3. Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

Hardly.

4. Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"? Does that mean
anything to you?

No. It mean nothing to me. (Nor to anyone else, I guess.)

5. Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

Post as much as you want -- like anyone else. But maybe it would be a

6. Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

Masochism?

7. Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

Depends. Some (most of them, imho) will and some maybe won't, I guess.

CarterBanks wrote:
"JSH" <jst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7e2ee5cf-e95e-4e0e-8580-8974677f1717@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Thanks for the replies so far. I will not reply to them all.

2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

Deliberately yes, in the one case where your paper was withdrawn because
of
errors, it is their responsibility to prevent substandard technical
content
(any paper with errors) from being published. No fraud involved, that is
too time consuming and complicated.

snip

but your paper did not get adequately
reviewed before publication, they should have rejected it earlier in the
process, and it was most likely the editor and crew did not have time to do
it.

The very submission of the paper was fraudulent on the part of Mr.
Harris.

The ideas in the paper had been presented in this forum, and he had
ALEADY
been told by a number of professional mathematicians that they were
erroneous.

8. Can Veterans be trusted?

9. Does having a high IQ mean you're smarter than someone with a math degree?

10. Are the people at alt.writing just jealous?

11. Should David Ullrich be put in jail?

12. If I can't factor a number, it must be prime, right?

13. Is a hyperbola just a parabola tipped sideways?

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1. Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

3. Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

4. Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"? Does that mean
anything to you?

5. Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

6. Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

7. Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?