| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Geology Forum » Stuart's predicament
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| don findlay |
 Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
For convenience in case it gets lost amongst all the other smelly red
herrings Stuart keeps strewing about the place, Stuart's predicament
is re-posted here :-
_____________________________________________
Stuart: - " > Except you have no obs for an expanding earth.
The observation is staring you in the face - the extrusion of the
mantle as ocean floors. Until you have an explanation for how
subduction gets going,
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/nonsense/rubber.html
...why subduction zones occur on continental margins,
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tck/latlong1.html
and why the continental lithosphere is said to force the oceanic
lithosphere down,
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/nonsense/fails.html
...until then there is no rational mechanism for subduction.
The default condition for the emplacement of ocean floors without
subduction is that the Earth is getting
bigger.
The question you have to ask yourself is how you have gotten yourself
into the predicament you have, where you have no answer to these
questions.
http://tinyurl.com/4dnwtr
_______________________________________
.... and is tomato sauce. Stuart thinks dousing them in the stuff is
somehow an answer .
Quote:- "Take a can of ketchup..."
http://tinyurl.com/45h65r
....click on link at the top of the page :- < Message from discussion
Seismic waves, density and temperature>
and follow from there. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| don findlay |
| Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
It's true Stuart, ..isn't it? You don't have a geological clue
whatsoever, ..how to support Plate Tectonics really, except to waffle
on about tomato sauce and other suchlike stuff you can put in a pot
and warm up to make it 'convect'. That's the limit of your ability in
this field. You have no answer to the geological conundrums other
than to gratuitously assert there are none, and to demonstrate it you
throw numbers around like confetti. Not once have you come up with
any geological argument to support your case.
What's more, there is nobody now even remotely prepared to back you.
Notice how they fell away when you lost your moniker. Your
institution doesn't like you using their logo as support either, does
it? No wonder!
As the front man supporting Plate Tectonics you need to do better.
You're only here because you have a bagful of the stuff (confetti),
and somehow feel empowered by it, ..but in fact it has no more
substance than your tomato sauce. That's why you're the only guy here
arguing for Plate Tectonics.
From a *geological* standpoint, there is no defence. (Refute that if
you can.) Which is why geologists are not prepared to try. Not even
(especially not) Teacher Bill there. (I'm surprised there are not
more teachers having a go at this actually. Why do you think that
is..?) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:48 pm |
|
|
|
|
On 13 avr, 04:36, don findlay <d...@tower.net.au> wrote:
Quote: It's true Stuart, ..isn't it? You don't have a geological clue
whatsoever, ..how to support Plate Tectonics really, except to waffle
on about tomato sauce and other suchlike stuff you can put in a pot
and warm up to make it 'convect'. That's the limit of your ability in
this field. You have no answer to the geological conundrums other
than to gratuitously assert there are none, and to demonstrate it you
throw numbers around like confetti. Not once have you come up with
any geological argument to support your case.
What's more, there is nobody now even remotely prepared to back you.
Notice how they fell away when you lost your moniker. Your
institution doesn't like you using their logo as support either, does
it? No wonder!
As the front man supporting Plate Tectonics you need to do better.
You're only here because you have a bagful of the stuff (confetti),
and somehow feel empowered by it, ..but in fact it has no more
substance than your tomato sauce. That's why you're the only guy here
arguing for Plate Tectonics.
From a *geological* standpoint, there is no defence. (Refute that if
you can.) Which is why geologists are not prepared to try. Not even
(especially not) Teacher Bill there. (I'm surprised there are not
more teachers having a go at this actually. Why do you think that
is..?)
Teachers are actually little cogs in a wide system of mind
programmation ... if any fails to deliver proper message, he is
dismissed .... and so would be Stuart if questioning that aspect of
the Geological Cursus related to PT ... indeed if pulling that card
from underneath the whole castle... the whole damned thing will crash
to the ground ! ... all things are related and every falsehood in the
present Geological Academic Theories support the others !
Do you think really that some people as Georges, Stuart, Bill etc are
going to accept that they were rolled in the flour, and further still
were so dull & dumb that they did not even realised it ?
NO !
Best regards jp
Note
Georges is not too well by the way |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:25 pm |
|
|
|
|
On 13 avr, 04:36, don findlay <d...@tower.net.au> wrote:
Quote: It's true Stuart, ..isn't it? You don't have a geological clue
whatsoever, ..how to support Plate Tectonics really, except to waffle
on about tomato sauce and other suchlike stuff you can put in a pot
and warm up to make it 'convect'. That's the limit of your ability in
this field. You have no answer to the geological conundrums other
than to gratuitously assert there are none, and to demonstrate it you
throw numbers around like confetti. Not once have you come up with
any geological argument to support your case.
What's more, there is nobody now even remotely prepared to back you.
Notice how they fell away when you lost your moniker. Your
institution doesn't like you using their logo as support either, does
it? No wonder!
As the front man supporting Plate Tectonics you need to do better.
You're only here because you have a bagful of the stuff (confetti),
and somehow feel empowered by it, ..but in fact it has no more
substance than your tomato sauce. That's why you're the only guy here
arguing for Plate Tectonics.
From a *geological* standpoint, there is no defence. (Refute that if
you can.) Which is why geologists are not prepared to try. Not even
(especially not) Teacher Bill there. (I'm surprised there are not
more teachers having a go at this actually. Why do you think that
is..?)
and what are you doing Don, to alleviate Stuart 's predicament ?
Can't you suggest some private tuition ? ... or alternatively a
seminar with intellectual needy people such as Georges, Landy, Bill
etc
Don't you have facilities for that in Perth ( it's so long since I
left I would not know )
jp |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| don findlay |
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
sir.jpturc...@neuf.fr wrote:
Quote: On 13 avr, 04:36, don findlay <d...@tower.net.au> wrote:
It's true Stuart, ..isn't it? � You don't have a geological clue
whatsoever, ..how to support Plate Tectonics really, except to waffle
on about tomato sauce and other suchlike stuff you can put in a pot
and warm up to make it 'convect'. �That's the limit of your ability in
this field. �You have no answer to the geological conundrums other
than to gratuitously �assert there are none, and to demonstrate it you
throw numbers around like confetti. �Not once have you come up with
any geological argument to support your case.
What's more, there is nobody now even remotely prepared to back you.
Notice how they fell away when you lost your moniker. �Your
institution doesn't like you using their logo as support either, does
it? � No wonder!
As the front man supporting Plate Tectonics you need to do better.
You're only here because you have a bagful of the stuff (confetti),
and somehow feel empowered by it, ..but in fact it has no more
substance than your tomato sauce. �That's why you're the only guy here
arguing for Plate Tectonics.
From a *geological* standpoint, there is no defence. (Refute that if
you can.) � Which is why geologists are not prepared to try. �Not even
(especially not) Teacher Bill there. �(I'm surprised there are not
more teachers having a go at this actually. �Why do you think that
is..?)
and what are you doing Don, to alleviate Stuart 's predicament ?
Well, ..as the frontman for Plate Tectonics on this newsgroup, he's
being given the opportunity of a page all to himself to argue the
salient points of Plate Tectonics. Thus far and within the scope of
his abilities he seems to be doing ok:-
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/nonsense/rubber.html
Quote:
Can't you suggest some private tuition ? ... or alternatively a
seminar with intellectual needy people such as Georges, Landy, Bill
etc
Don't you have facilities for that in Perth ( it's so long since I
left I would not know )
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat May 17, 2008 2:53 am
|
|
