"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fudo7t$38i$2
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
gregvk wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fudhbm$fqi$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
gregvk wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fubc0f$n2r$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
gregvk wrote:
"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:68fmh2yughsd.dlg@fallen.angel:
While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men,
and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8483CA17940E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:
"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel:
While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a
loud sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit
in <news:Xns9A8473FDFB5CBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:
"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:1lpsibd1x7zme$.dlg@fallen.angel:
While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a
loud sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men, and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8470037CEBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:
ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A84637A0A36CLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:
On 18 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard gregvk cry out in
news:Xns9A846AD18429BE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...
ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A845F0DC1F72LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:
On 17 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard Frank cry out in
news:fu95lt$nnf$1@aioe.org...
"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8r9m$11c$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <6a9vpdezhzdc$.dlg@fallen.angel>, ^reaper^
knocking@deaths.door said:
While sipping absinthe, Kali <kali@powder.keg
heard a loud sucking noise
coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:fu81nh$svt$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:
In <fu64uq$a0i$1@aioe.org>, Frank
dawgface@ten.hut
said:
"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu5f4m$nqd$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu3q43$rsg$1@aioe.org>, Frank
dawgface@ten.hut said:
No one in spp was aware of her until 2004, when
Pablo started posting to spp. I was here the
entire time, and I know this.
Being aware of her is not the subject, posting
is.
What did the facts ever do to you, to deserve so
much disdain?
Are you really that blind or ignorant? Speak about
lack of reading comprehension.
Here is a clue for you, I'm sure I can find
evidence of her posting here
before 2004 or Pablo, I'm also pretty sure you
will find some reason to
discount it or obfuscate the posts will excessive
dribble.
It won't change the facts.
Evidence would.
You seem to have forgotten Gore & Pablo were very
much involved in the Andrew Chimelewski / Mark
Morin bit ... which, of course, spilled over into
spp bc Morin was a regular poster in this group
http://snipurl.com/24sn7
I do remember Andrew very well, and remember using
the Ignore Thread option with a lot of his stuff.
Before that, her first post to spp was on August 26,
2000 in a discussion
on "Ritalin vs. Spanking-CPS laws lead to drugging"
with Dr. Price, Nancy
Alvarado, Andrew Chimelewski, and a couple of other
ASDM folk.
news:taae5$8ge$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Fwiw, here's the complete thread
http://snipurl.com/24snc
Both Alvarado & Price were regular spp posters (for
quite some time, in
fact), and when I asked Price about Gore shortly
after her reappearance in
2004, he was more than aware of her. Which refutes
your assertion, "No one
in spp was aware of her until 2004."
Her posts apparently just weren't remarkable or
frequent enough for me to remember until 2004, and I
certainly wouldn't consider her a regular spp poster
until 2004. Maybe I ignored most of those crossposted
threads she participated in - something I did with a
lot of the alt.flame.psychiatry and Andrew stuff.
Same goes for Pablo, who started posting to spp
regularly around Jan. 2001, maybe a bit sooner.
Color me technically corrected, with thanks.
Figures, I expected the same had I posted some links
first, and there are others.
Excuses, excuses, always excuses in your life. I'd bet
you had to duck n run under fire too!
rotflmao.
at least Kali has the maturity and dignity to be
corrected...
Another way of looking at that is she's stupid enough to
admit fault.
I suppose if you're a closed minded dolt with no interest
in personal improvement that might be one way of looking
at it.
IMO admitting ones mistakes and being willing to correct
them is both an honorable and respectable trait.
Refusing to do so is a weakness and makes one unworthy
of debate.
Recognizing and correcting one's mistakes is honorable and
respectable, but openly admitting to them is pathetic at
best and dangerous at worst; whining serves no purposes
other than to attract attention and/or give others ammo
with which to ruin you at their convenience.
Life Rule #602: When you fuck up, just shut your mouth
and fix it.
People respond to admissions of mistakes made. It makes
those who make said mistakes seem more human.
It makes them seem pathetic and stupid. Like I said, the
only reason to announce your fuckup is to attract attention
(pathetic) and it's likely to attract destructive attention
(stupid).
The *only* reason? Erm... okay. LOLOL
Since you didn't bother to cite any exceptions, I can only
assume that you agree (despite your rather childish response).
There will always be those who are
looking for faults in others. They will undoubtedly find
it.
There is no need for anyone to look when it involves
somebody who brags about their faults like they're proud of
them.
While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in
spp was aware of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of
her until 2004."), her response was not even remotely a brag.
Hence, your point is moot.
Announcing your faults only serves to attract attention. Call
it bragging, call it attention-whoring, call it whatever you
want, but the term you use won't change what it is.
Glass houses being what they are...
news:Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA3571D6@204.153.245.20
Thanks for sharing! LOLOL
The requested message,
Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA357D6@204.153.245.20, could not be
found.
LOLOL
innocently> It came right up on my server.
You sure about that?
puzzled> Sure about what?
Well, that part seems to have pretty much run its course, so I'll go
ahead and reveal it.
The message ID that I was whining about is not the same one that
whatsisname posted. Compare them very carefully, you'll see.
Ah, it was a test of alphabetical skills (what's the difference
between "E" and "F") not a topical object lesson.
Well, it served the latter purpose just as well...right up until the
moment you ruined it, you bastard.
YHBT (You and about three others.)
How refreshing. A harmless, not cruel, not vindictive troll.
/snicker
runs
/points and laughs
I've got something better to point and laugh at: my daughter trying
to keep up with three five-day old orphaned kittens that some woman
brought into her store and pawned off on her. We have two cats, and
we're moving at the end of the month. (I already know we're going
to end up with at least one of them, so you may continue to point
and laugh at me too.)
P.S. Need a kitty? They'll be ready in about 8 weeks.
No. But I'll tell you a good way to get rid of them (that doesn't
involve a gunny sack, a big rock and a lake). Some years back I
found a scrawny little cat cowering behind a dumpster, so I took it
to work and told some woman she could have it if she flashed me, and
she actually did it. Maybe the same thing would work in reverse.
In my case, I know only one person on whom such a tactic would be
both honorable and effective. Given that, I may as well keep the
damn cat because I'll eventually get it back anyway.
Your daughter is in her 20s, right?
