|
Science Forum Index » Physics - Relativity Forum » My New Energy Formula
Page 2 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Guest |
 Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:53 pm |
|
|
|
|
Dono wrote:
Quote:
Have you applied to the closest lunatic asylum? We are quite sure
you'll be accepted in a heartbeat.
Dear Newsgroup
I strongly believe that, you are quite emotional and nervous and out
of control of your mind and actions.
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:12 am |
|
|
|
|
Dear Newsgroup:
About 10 years ago a colleague of mine at the university of Manitoba
provided a letter of recommendation.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math.symbolic/browse_thread/thread/740ca636dcce43ff/2421dcd30ee89c0e?lnk=st&q=%232421dcd30ee89c0e
Well, he later said they do not look at his references.
This is the reality of the math community gangsters; I wonder why the
American higher educational system is so mixed up.
Unfortunately the nature of my research is in such a way that, they do
not see their power preserved upon its growth (their phony fields may
be dismantled).
Since 10 years ago my production on this research has also been
tripled, thus the length of my unemployment as well.
Those at MIT, Harvard, etc only view their academic power, and have no
interest for true science.
They have completely forgotten the history (they are so naïve).
I assure you they cannot deceive the public forever. They will be
prosecuted and will be forced to leave their positions or their status
will be restricted.
Think about my New Energy Formula and see how the universe structured
mathematically in a simple Riccati differential equation at its heart.
X’ +X^2 = g (t)
Is it not simple and beautiful?
Try to get to know my new science, and forget power struggles in the
academia, which is poisoning and destroying the American higher
educational system.
Vote for my new math!
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 9:00 am |
|
|
|
|
Dear Newsgroup:
On early 1980 I looked at the sky and wished to have my own simple
formula representing mathematical structure of the universe.
Today I have it, My New Energy Formula:
X’+X^2 = g (t)
Is it not simple and beautiful?
Do they accept that I have a new mathematical Energy formula different
than the physics formula of E =m c^2 ?
Do they believe that my new math might be as strong as Newton’s
Calculus?
No doubt, they will get very nervous and highly emotional!
Thus out of control of their academic hiring practice on my
application.
But science speaks the truth, and unfortunately they cannot cover and
ignore it permanently.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:21 pm |
|
|
|
|
Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Quote: Dear Newsgroup:
On early 1980 I looked at the sky and wished to have my own simple
formula representing mathematical structure of the universe.
Today I have it, My New Energy Formula:
X�+X^2 = g (t)
Is it not simple and beautiful?
Dear Newsgroup:
Someone in the newsgroup sci. physics commented the following about my
New Energy Formula:
ahahahAHAHAHA... yeah, yeah.. and that took you 28 years?
Quote: ahahaha... I shall advise my HR-departments in all divisions
to put you, "Dr.", into the category: "Don't call us. We'll call you"
Till then, thanks for the laughs... ahahahaha...
ahahahaha... ahahanson
My answer:
Yes, it took me 28 years! Research on this topic is very slow.
Sometimes its takes a year, you get epsilon advancement in this field.
Initially I was working for couple of years to assign a differential
equation to a polynomial and although I had some results, but not
significant.
Only in 1996 i.e. about 16 years after my research on Riccati, I had
noticed to solve polynomials with separable Riccati equations.
Thus eventually I considered generally a method attacking polynomials
with Riccati equations.
Initially in solving Riccati differential equations, we will see that
Riccati equations are included in higher order linear differential
equations of variable type.
This is also true for polynomials.
So around 1997 I began to notice this INVERSE relation, as key
observation including polynomials in Riccati.
As mentioned on my statement of research I first saw papers of
associating polynomials with linear differential equations in 2004
(i.e.1860-61 papers).
I still do not know how they had done it (i.e.1860 paper); I believe
my method is simpler and expandable. Although they had only experiment
their results with quadratic and cubic, nothing more.
What I wanted to say, one wonders why since 140 years WE DID NOT HAVE
PUBLICATIONS on this topic.
The next to the line is my results (No one published and will publish
it).
Yes, it takes years to develop a solid science i.e. the next Newton’s
Calculus or Energy formula.
The math community does not want to consider this fact.
I have lost my career to create this science, no laughing matter!
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:52 pm |
|
|
|
|
Dear Newsgroup:
Please find enclosed a PDF file of a polynomial in x of degree 110.
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1733512&tstart=0
This is a multi-parameter polynomial carried out on Maple 11, took
about 12 minutes of time and 11 MB bytes of Ram (with Mac G5).
I have its program; such that it is possible on a University
supercomputer we calculate polynomials of degrees of a few thousand.
This includes all polynomials in this class as well as its Riccati
differential equations and its applications.
One can systematically create other classes of polynomials with
complex Riccati differential equations and applications (like
hypergeometric functions and integrals as well as linear and non-
linear differential equations).
Thus we will have millions of new information available on our
software.
I believe these degrees are out of range of Galois theory.
It is hard to tell the math community that now the center of problem
solving of all major branches of mathematics concentrated in Riccati
(They do not listen).
I also enclose Maple output of the polynomial.
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dono |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 24, 9:52 pm, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Quote: Dear Newsgroup:
Please find enclosed a PDF file of a polynomial in x of degree 110.
so what? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:39 pm |
|
|
|
|
Dono wrote:
Quote: On Apr 24, 9:52 pm, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Dear Newsgroup:
Please find enclosed a PDF file of a polynomial in x of degree 110.
so what?
Dear Newsgroup:
This means ,it is beginning steps to understand that the Riccati
equation is the center of universe structure, to function its
mathematical activities.
Well, after 5 years of international research on this topic, my New
Energy Formula will be recognized.
Eventually you will see that many mathematical applications will be
communicated through Riccati.
It also means that in the first place the Galois theory will get more
near to the trash can to be disposed of its math field.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eric Gisse |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:58 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 25, 12:39 am, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Quote: Dono wrote:
On Apr 24, 9:52 pm, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Dear Newsgroup:
Please find enclosed a PDF file of a polynomial in x of degree 110.
so what?
Dear Newsgroup:
This means ,it is beginning steps to understand that the Riccati
equation is the center of universe structure, to function its
mathematical activities.
Show us how to obtain the generator of the Lorentz group from the
Riccati equation. Lorentz symmetry is the cornerstone of modern
physics - one would think you'd be able to find it if what you say is
true.
Quote:
Well, after 5 years of international research on this topic, my New
Energy Formula will be recognized.
Only five? Folks have been parroting their theories on here for
decades! You got a long way to go.
Quote:
Eventually you will see that many mathematical applications will be
communicated through Riccati.
It also means that in the first place the Galois theory will get more
near to the trash can to be disposed of its math field.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 6:02 am |
|
|
|
|
Eric Gisse wrote:
Quote: Show us how to obtain the generator of the Lorentz group from the
Riccati equation. Lorentz symmetry is the cornerstone of modern
physics - one would think you'd be able to find it if what you say is
true.
Dear Newsgroup:
Generally algebraic methods will be diminished and modern Riccati
methods will substitute it.
Galois theory also Lorentz groups will be of no need in the future
(they will be out of order anyway).
This is because more powerful other methods rooted in Riccati will
substitute them.
Thus I consider group theory, Galois theory, Lie Algebras will be
outdates (they are not powerful anyway with respect to the world of
differential equations). And algebraic fields will be mainly out of
business, or substantially reduced.
During early 1970 years in Canada, I remember we had to punch holes in
paper cards and feed them to computers. Those days are far away now.
Still people need time to get to know this new world of universe of
computations, that is why I have given them 5 years time of research.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dono |
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:20 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| kp |
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:37 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
| This guy is pure comedy gold! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dono |
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:16 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 25, 1:37 pm, kp <4vec...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: This guy is pure comedy gold!
He's madder than the Mad Hatter  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 5:44 pm |
|
|
|
|
On Apr 25, 1:16 pm, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 25, 1:37 pm, kp <4vec...@gmail.com> wrote:
This guy is pure comedy gold!
He's madder than the Mad Hatter
The energy of matter in motion is above c squared.
The 4th dimension is at right angles to the universe.
Mitch Raemsch; falling light changes colour |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eric Gisse |
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:10 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 25, 8:02 am, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
[...]
In other words - you can't. That's _all_ you had to say! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:01 pm |
|
|
|
|
Eric Gisse wrote:
In other words - you can't. That's _all_ you had to say!
Dear Newsgroup:
That is one way to interpret my statement. I cannot reject it.
But there is a world here, where I am computing, that truly current
algebraic methods have very small influence.
In other words hundreds of millions of new information will be
surfaced in software, that no one pays attention to such and such
group theory properties, particularly Galois theory related.
It is a new universe of computations, never experienced before.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
