Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Environment Forum  »  Brazilian Loggers Want Greenpeace Out
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
Vendicar Decarian
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2003 1:05 am
Guest
Quote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:lapbuv0qv38fhfeg191esu3ldrsgbj1053@4ax.com...
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 13:16:22 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
LOL. Why don't you quote us chapter and verse of the sham
science, James. Please, use on technical language and explain in
detail where the errors in the science lie.

"James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote in message news:6EEFb.812$3D2.623@fe10...
Quote:
When it's political and has an agenda, the conclusions of the science is
bogus.

In other words, everythign James claims is bogus, because James is nothing
but deceitful NeoCon Agenda.

Thanx for making this clear to us James.
Vendicar Decarian
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2003 1:07 am
Guest
Quote:
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:L_pFb.22944$mV5.10973@read1.cgocable.net...
http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/policy/climate_change_position.html

Human Impacts on Climate
Adopted by Council December, 2003

Human activities are increasingly altering the Earth's climate. These
effects
add to natural influences that have been present over Earth's history.
Scientific evidence strongly indicates that natural influences cannot
explain
the rapid increase in global near-surface temperatures observed during
the
second half of the 20th century.



"James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote in message news:4HEFb.815$3D2.394@fe10...
Quote:
That's because they don't know what they are.

Are you suggesting that you do know when the worlds experts in Climatology
do not (as you now assert)?

Or are you simply jabbering nonsense out of some NeoCon faithbook?
 
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:25 am