| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Electronics - Cad Forum » Cheap Schematic Capture
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
|
| Author |
Message |
| Joel Koltner |
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:52 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hi Brad,
"Brad Velander" <bveland@SpamThis.com> wrote in message
news:vl7tj.40353$Ly.26140@pd7urf1no...
Quote: Your points are valid but I think it is far exceeding the OP
needs/knowledge. Would you really think that he is going to do even a
quarter of all that?
I expect the O.P. actually would make great use of fast & easy gate/pin
swapping if available in the program he's using, and there's a decent chance
he'd set up at least a few rudimentary net classes ("Power" & "Signal" are
always favorites), but other than that, no, he won't likely be using many of
those high-end features. My post was more just to provide some of the "bigger
picture" for his own edification.
(My experience with gate/pin swapping is that pretty much everyone does it if
the layout program has the knowledge of the various legal swaps -- or has a
feature to try to optimize the rat's nest by automatically performing these
swaps, as Pulsonix and some other programs can -- whereas if you have to
manually tell the layout package "swap pin 2 and 3" or "swap pins 1, 2, and 3
with 7, 6, and 5" a lot of people won't bother since it's more effort than
just making a slightly "messy" route instead.)
---Joel |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Brad Velander |
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Joel,
Your impression of the OP was obviously greater than mine. I sensed that
he was at best a hobbiest but since he didn't already have a tool, I
surmised that most tools and functions would simply bog him down. Not to say
that he may not be very intelligent, I just know how the average person gets
bogged down learning the nuances of a CAD program and most don't do get it
right when they do get through it.
As for pin/gate swapping, I never use the automatic features because
they don't intelligently apply any details about the routing, just simple
manhattan distance minimizations. Which are usually definitely not routing
optimized and no software can do that that I have seen.
--
Sincerely,
Brad Velander.
"Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ajktj.15795$fB7.7027@en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com...
Quote: Hi Brad,
"Brad Velander" <bveland@SpamThis.com> wrote in message
news:vl7tj.40353$Ly.26140@pd7urf1no...
Your points are valid but I think it is far exceeding the OP
needs/knowledge. Would you really think that he is going to do even a
quarter of all that?
I expect the O.P. actually would make great use of fast & easy gate/pin
swapping if available in the program he's using, and there's a decent
chance he'd set up at least a few rudimentary net classes ("Power" &
"Signal" are always favorites), but other than that, no, he won't likely
be using many of those high-end features. My post was more just to
provide some of the "bigger picture" for his own edification.
(My experience with gate/pin swapping is that pretty much everyone does it
if the layout program has the knowledge of the various legal swaps -- or
has a feature to try to optimize the rat's nest by automatically
performing these swaps, as Pulsonix and some other programs can -- whereas
if you have to manually tell the layout package "swap pin 2 and 3" or
"swap pins 1, 2, and 3 with 7, 6, and 5" a lot of people won't bother
since it's more effort than just making a slightly "messy" route instead.)
---Joel
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Joel Koltner |
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:39 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hi Brad,
"Brad Velander" <bveland@SpamThis.com> wrote in message
news:g6rtj.49648$FA.37085@pd7urf2no...
Quote: As for pin/gate swapping, I never use the automatic features because they
don't intelligently apply any details about the routing, just simple
manhattan distance minimizations. Which are usually definitely not routing
optimized and no software can do that that I have seen.
Agreed, although I often find that Manhattan-distance optimized pin/gate
swapping is *closer* to "routing optimized" than just whatever happens to pop
out from the schematic in the first place.
I have a great deal of respect for really good PCB layout guys (of which I'm
not one )... it's amazing what they can "see" just by looking at a rat's
nest relative to most people.
---Joel |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| FrankW |
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:24 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Well there ya go Dirk.
Providing a schematic from a cheap capture package
does not help the layout Person. It only invites more
chances of errors.
Cheers
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Quote: On 12 Feb, 15:38, FrankW <fw...@norpak.ca> wrote:
The cheapest and best for the layout guy
would be a pencil and a piece of paper (napkin even) :-)
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Hi
I'm looking for a cheap (or free!) schematic capture package that can
output in PADS format. I'm not the layout guy but it will certainly
save him time compared with me drawing out the circuit in a normal CAD
package. Pin count around 1000 at present.
Dirk
Not at $60 and hour it wouldn't, since I would already have done the
work.
Can I have some sensible answers please.
Dirk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:55 pm |
|
|
|
|
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bruere@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On 12 Feb, 15:59, DJ Delorie <d...@delorie.com> wrote:
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru...@gmail.com> writes:
I'm looking for a cheap (or free!) schematic capture package that can
output in PADS format. I'm not the layout guy but it will certainly
Do you need a PADS schematic, or just a PADS netlist?
gschem has a PADS netlister if you just need a netlist, and gschem
(part of gEDA) is free (beer-wise and speech-wise). (and no, it won't
force you to distribute your schematics)
http://www.geda.seul.org/
Thanks
Not sure which one I need - I'll have to talk with the layout guy.
However, it's got to be Windows. That's all we have here. I've tried
using Linux in the past but its a real pain.
Try www.FreeBSD.org then :p
Anyway both KiCad and gEDA/gschem is available in both win32 & Linux |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dirk Bruere at NeoPax |
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:27 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 21 Feb, 13:24, FrankW <fw...@norpak.ca> wrote:
Quote: Well there ya goDirk.
Providing a schematic from a cheap capture package
does not help the layout Person. It only invites more
chances of errors.
Cheers
Thanks.
Normally when I've done h/w design I've had the layout guy onsite with
my drawings in his hands and me standing over him telling him what
bits are critical and what bits aren't, and checking while he goes
along. I'll just draw the schematics using a 2D CAD package and then
he can copy it manually into whatever he uses (Mentor IIRC).
Dirk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dirk Bruere at NeoPax |
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:14 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 17 Mar, 17:27, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On 21 Feb, 13:24, FrankW <fw...@norpak.ca> wrote:
Well there ya goDirk.
Providing a schematic from a cheap capture package
does not help the layout Person. It only invites more
chances of errors.
Cheers
Thanks.
Normally when I've done h/w design I've had the layout guy onsite with
my drawings in his hands and me standing over him telling him what
bits are critical and what bits aren't, and checking while he goes
along. I'll just draw the schematics using a 2D CAD package and then
he can copy it manually into whatever he uses (Mentor IIRC).
Dirk
BTW, would providing a netlist be useful?
Dirk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| FrankW |
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:14 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Yes it may be usefull if it's created in a format
your layout guy can use. Talk to him to get the details.
Problem is, when trying to make changes it's a lot harder
than changing the source shematic (if any)
Cheers
Frank
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Quote: On 17 Mar, 17:27, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 21 Feb, 13:24, FrankW <fw...@norpak.ca> wrote:
Well there ya goDirk.
Providing a schematic from a cheap capture package
does not help the layout Person. It only invites more
chances of errors.
Cheers
Thanks.
Normally when I've done h/w design I've had the layout guy onsite with
my drawings in his hands and me standing over him telling him what
bits are critical and what bits aren't, and checking while he goes
along. I'll just draw the schematics using a 2D CAD package and then
he can copy it manually into whatever he uses (Mentor IIRC).
Dirk
BTW, would providing a netlist be useful?
Dirk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:36 am
|
|