Good,stick with your surface correlations and Earth expansion,you
would not like fossil data of land animals demonstrating that great
creatures roamed an Earth which is pretty much the same size today.

looked at your
ee notion,recognised that an expanding Earth means that the oceans
would have covered all landmass 100's millions of years ago and leave
no room for land animals.

oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com> wrote:
 looked at your
ee notion,recognised that an expanding Earth means that the oceans
would have covered all landmass 100's millions of years ago and leave
no room for land animals.

And that is stupid reasoning! Water comes form devolatilization of the
mantle. It is evident that there was less water 100 millions years ago.

--
Florian
"Toute vérité passe par trois phases. D'abord, elle est ridiculisée;
ensuite, elle rencontre une vive opposition avant d'être acceptée comme
une totale évidence" - Arthur Schopenhauer

oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com> wrote:
 looked at your
ee notion,recognised that an expanding Earth means that the oceans
would have covered all landmass 100's millions of years ago and leave
no room for land animals.

And that is stupid reasoning! Water comes form devolatilization of the
mantle.

I am content with paleontological data which supports that no great
difference exists in the size of the Earth and the story that fossils
tell.

Of course your 'devolatilzation of the mantle' involves subduction
which you manage to argue against in trying to support the ee junk -

oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com> wrote:
Of course your 'devolatilzation of the mantle' involves subduction
which you manage to argue against in trying to support the ee junk  -

Wrong again. Devolatilization occurs obviously at the ridges or at any
place material erupts. There are also some good evidence that the
lithosphere is leaking gases through its faults (it was proven for
Helium).

In regard to subduction, you certainly misspelled "overthrusting".

Well, mate, I'm afraid this discussion won't be very constructive. Bye
then.

--
Florian
"Toute vérité passe par trois phases. D'abord, elle est ridiculisée;
ensuite, elle rencontre une vive opposition avant d'être acceptée comme
une totale évidence" - Arthur Schopenhauer

oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am content with paleontological data which supports that no great
difference exists in the size of the Earth and the story that fossils
tell.

That is a false statement. There is no way to tell the size of the earth
from paleontological records.

--
Florian
"Toute vérité passe par trois phases. D'abord, elle est ridiculisée;
ensuite, elle rencontre une vive opposition avant d'être acceptée comme
une totale évidence" - Arthur Schopenhauer

oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com> wrote:
Good for you,you want subduction for water generation

?? Whatever.

and don't want it for your balooning Earth.

If you mean by subduction, that odean floor is buried by overthrusting,
then that is ok. But if you believe that the seafloor is literally
plunging in the mantle, you have to be crazy.

Let me show you something:

http://nachon.free.fr/GE/pacific/Philippines.jpg

See the Mariana orocline (E145/N20) ? The front is arc-shaped and show
the direction of absolute motion. It is lithosphere pushed from below by
mantle upwelling so that it overrides older seafloor and lithosphere is
stretched at the back of the orocline thus forming a new ridge. These
oroclines are *Everywhere*.

If you can't figure it out, then change of discipline.

--
Florian
"Toute vérité passe par trois phases. D'abord, elle est ridiculisée;
ensuite, elle rencontre une vive opposition avant d'être acceptée comme
une totale évidence" - Arthur Schopenhauer

oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com> wrote:
Good for you,you want subduction for water generation

?? Whatever.

and don't want it for your balooning Earth.

If you mean by subduction, that odean floor is buried by overthrusting,
then that is ok. But if you believe that the seafloor is literally
plunging in the mantle, you have to be crazy.

Let me show you something:

http://nachon.free.fr/GE/pacific/Philippines.jpg

See the Mariana orocline (E145/N20) ? The front is arc-shaped and show
the direction of absolute motion. It is lithosphere pushed from below by
mantle upwelling so that it overrides older seafloor and lithosphere is
stretched at the back of the orocline thus forming a new ridge. These
oroclines are *Everywhere*.

If you can't figure it out, then change of discipline.

--
Florian
"Toute vérité passe par trois phases. D'abord, elle est ridiculisée;
ensuite, elle rencontre une vive opposition avant d'être acceptée comme
une totale évidence" - Arthur Schopenhauer

oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com> wrote:
You are using convection [...]

Wrong after only 3 words. Congratulation!

Convection implies upward and downward circulation.
What we see is what we get. We only have evidence of upward movement
(diapirism).

Guess what? auxotectonics implies precisely there should be ascending
material making its way toward the surface... Go figure who's right...

--
Florian
"Toute vérité passe par trois phases. D'abord, elle est ridiculisée;
ensuite, elle rencontre une vive opposition avant d'être acceptée comme
une totale évidence" - Arthur Schopenhauer

oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com> wrote:
I do not like making somebody look like a fool and especially a person
who can barely string together a dozen words.

Feel free to correct my english. I don't mind.

Now that you have argued for water creation to keep pace with Earth
expansion,you would have to explain fossils of sharks and other marine
creatures found in rocks and the basis of the orginal geological
principles by Steno -

Yet another Strawman...
Let me get this straight. There has always been water on earth. Period.

--
Florian
"Toute vérité passe par trois phases. D'abord, elle est ridiculisée;
ensuite, elle rencontre une vive opposition avant d'être acceptée comme
une totale évidence" - Arthur Schopenhauer

On Mar 18, 7:34�pm, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com> wrote:
Good for you,you want subduction for water generation

?? Whatever.

and don't want it for your balooning Earth.

If you mean by subduction, that odean floor is buried by overthrusting,
then that is ok. But if you believe that the seafloor is literally
plunging in the mantle, you have to be crazy.

Let me show you something:

http://nachon.free.fr/GE/pacific/Philippines.jpg

See the Mariana orocline (E145/N20) ? The front is arc-shaped and show
the direction of absolute motion. It is lithosphere pushed from below by
mantle upwelling so that it overrides older seafloor and lithosphere is
stretched at the back of the orocline thus forming a new ridge. These
oroclines are *Everywhere*.

If you can't figure it out, then change of discipline.

--
Florian
"Toute v�rit� passe par trois phases. D'abord, elle est ridiculis�e;
ensuite, elle rencontre une vive opposition avant d'�tre accept�e comme
une totale �vidence" - Arthur Schopenhauer

You only get one shot at promoting your balooning Earth and
considering you used a conventional plate tectonic explanation for the
generation of water what would I have to gain by discussing anything
with a person who can act like a spoilt child an indulge himself in
then concluding subduction does not exist Biological evolution is
always intimately linked with plate motiom and I love that side of
geology too much to care for somebody who only traffics in surface
correlations.

The unfortunate part is that plate tectonics as a whole
package,demonstrating the forces acting on the Earth internally and
astronomically,fossil data,climatological elements ect will be
undermined by junk concepts such as your own .As the person who uses
differential rotation as the common link between planetary shape and
crustal motion my only concern is that 'convection cells' do not
undermine plate tectonics rather than dealing with the worthless junk
in your head.

Many are sucked into asking about 'mass' but I enjoy that the Earth's
climate and geology has not changed much since the dinosaurs and
mammals roamed the planet.There is nothing to be gained by believing
otherwise unless you have an addiction for exotic junk as is now found
in astronomy.

Good for you,you want subduction for water generation

and don't want it for your balooning Earth.

I do not like making somebody look like a fool and especially a person
who can barely string together a dozen words.

Now that you have argued for water creation to keep pace with Earth
expansion,you would have to explain fossils of sharks and other marine
creatures found in rocks and the basis of the orginal geological
principles by Steno -