| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Geology - Meteorology Forum » question and answers about earthquake prediction
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| ronaldkarel |
 Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 2:26 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
How come the traditional seismologists can make long terme earthquake
prediction without knowing the following answers;
1.- I believe that mostly new fault lines occur in lithosphere near
existing fault lines... If it's not true just tell me please.. So if
it is true, we all know that it is very difficult to identify this new
fault lines in many countries.. Because it is very expensive, very
difficult to realize this research.. And also if the fault lines occur
under the oceans, it will be nearly impossible to identify them
CORRECTLY...
2.- How come, many EARTH SCIENCES academicians who reject categoricly
the idea of PRE EARTHQUAKE SIGNALS CAN EXIST, try to make earthquake
predictions regarding THE PAST, THE HISTORY of the fault lines ?
I received some answers about those questions... http://www.meteoquake.org |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Robert Blass |
| Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:26:54 -0700 (PDT), ronaldkarel
<ronald.karel@ntlworld.com> sayd the following:
Quote: How come the traditional seismologists can make long terme earthquake
prediction without knowing the following answers;
No one can predict an earthquake. If such person is alive I suggest
they go to Vegas and make a few $Billion. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Jul 25, 2008 3:16 am
|
|
