Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Energy - Hydrogen Forum  »  Call the Police = Get Strip Searched
Page 3 of 3    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
Ed Stasiak
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:23 pm
Guest
Quote:
hhc314 wrote
Ed Stasiak wrote

You actually believe this crap? Take a look at the source of this
information, and its history.

Who, WKYC-TV Cleveland which reported this story or the Stark
County Sheriffs Dept which filmed it's officers forcibly stripping a
woman "for her own safety"?

Quote:
If you really believe that the many police officers involved in this
situation would be willing to lose their pensions if the treatment of
this ;prisoner was not precisely conducted by the rules, then friend
you are living on a different planet than I am.

Male police officers taking part in the forcible stripping of a woman
in their custody, leaving the woman naked in a cell for 6 hours,
denying
her the opportunity to make a phone call, providing her with no
medical
attention and sending her to booking wearing only a vest are actions
"precisely conducted by the rules"?

But what are the odds that after the court case is over (and the city
has
lost) that the cops involved will be faced with anything worse than a
few
weeks of paid leave, while the tax payers pick up the check for the
multi
million dollar settlement?

Quote:
You will note that the link that you posted contains absoutely no
detail about why the woman was arrested, nor any facts. I want to
know what the details are, what the arrest caue was, what the arrest
situation was, not just the crap that some gutter rag decides to post.

I'll agree that the story reported has very few facts beyond what the
TV
news crew managed to dig up and what the sheriffs dept video shows.

But in addition to what the reporters found out, the video is damming
evidence in itself, (more so as the cops only provided an suspiciously
edited version) on top of the ludicrous statement from the police
chief
that what we saw happening somehow wasn't a strip search.

But if you're looking for more facts, maybe you ought to start by
asking
the sheriffs dept why they refuse to discuss this incident?

Quote:
If I knew the facts, I might believe that the police had reason to suspect
her of being a "drug mule" for which elder women and pregnant girls are
frequently employed. Still, the total lack of facts about this prevents the
formation of any informed opinion.

Yet this doesn't stop you from suggesting that a suburban soccer mom
is possibly a drug mule, even thou none of the articles related to
this
incident mention anything of the sort....

A bit more info;

Couple sues over Stark County incident
By LARRY SHIELDS, Salem News staff writer
http://www.salemnews.net/news/articles.asp?articleID=9849

SALEM -- A Salem couple cited Stark County commissioners, the
sheriff, a deputy and 15 unnamed John and Jane Does in a federal
lawsuit claiming violations of their rights under the Fourth, Eighth
and
14th Amendments to the Constitution.

Hope and Greg Steffey filed the action last October in the United
States District Court in Cleveland.

Greg Steffey is the athletic director at Salem High School.

According to court documents, Hope Steffey claims assault, battery,
unreasonable seizure and deliberate indifference by failing to provide
adequate medical care, while both claim damage from "unreasonable
governmental actions by the defendants."

Named as defendants are Sheriff Timothy A. Swanson, the three
commissioners, Deputy Richard T. Gurlea, along with John and
Jane Does numbers one through 15.

The Stark County Sheriff reportedly denied the allegations.

The narrative of court documents said that on Oct. 20, 2006
Hope Steffey was allegedly assaulted by another woman on
Weimer Dr. S.E. and Gurlea responded, questioned Steffey
and asked for identification and she "mistakenly" produced
the driver's license of her dead sister, which she kept as a
personal memento.

She immediately recognized her mistake and asked for it back,
but Gurlea allegedly refused.

Documents say she "begged" for the return of her license but
it wasn't returned.

The deputy then ran a computer check of the right license and
Steffey's cousin noticed a bald spot on her head from the assault.

The cousin "reminded" the deputy that Steffey was the victim
while advising Steffey of the hair loss which made her visibly
upset.

The documents alleged Gurlea failed to call for medical assistance
despite knowledge Steffey was injured.

Gurlea the, documents allege, warned Steffey to calm down
and Steffey replied she was upset and could exercise her
freedom of speech and her cousin again attempted to remind
the deputy that Steffey was the victim and she had been
knocked unconscious by the assailant.

The deputy allegedly refused to acknowledge her injuries.

Court documents said that after searching Steffey's car, he
turned to the two and questioned the cousin when Steffey
asked for her sister's license back.

Gurlea allegedly turned angrily and responded "shut up about
your dead sister."

Steffey pointed her finger at her sister's license in the deputy's
pocket and said, "she was here, she was someone" and Gurlea
allegedly, suddenly exploded into a rage and allegedly slammed
her face into his cruiser breaking a tooth, and pinning her against
the cruiser, allegedly saying, "are you going to stop?"

The documents allege Gurlea then threw her to the ground causing
cuts and bruises and with the weight of his body on her she could
not breathe.

Steffey was then handcuffed and told to sit in the cruiser.

At the county jail, court documents allege she was knocked to
the ground with male deputies/guard/staff present.

She was questioned and allegedly strip searched without
authorization, pursuant to law and policy.

Steffey was allegedly held to the ground and stripped completely
naked and left inside the jail cell for six hours without a blanket
and
"in order to try to keep warm, and regain dignity" she "wrapped
herself in toilet paper to prevent the Sheriff's deputies/guards/staff
from seeing her
naked."

The documents allege she was not permitted access to a telephone;
was not "booked" for six hours; didn't receive "reasonable" medical
attention for six over hours; repeatedly called for help; went without
clothing; spent the entire night in jail naked; and was "eventually"
advised by a guard she was charged with resisting and disorderly
conduct.

The documents allege she was physically and emotionally brutalized
while Gurlea and the John and Jane Does "sought charges against"
her to cover up their "unreasonable acts and omissions."

Greg Steffey claims to have lost the love, society, affection and
consortium of his wife as a direct result of the actions and inactions
of the defendants in one of the six claims for relief.

The 16-page complaint notes in the fifth claim for relief that the
sheriff produced thousands of pages of requested records, but
"specifically failed to produce the videotape of the strip search."

It added, "The available public records indicate the videotape
camera that would have captured the incident was functioning."

Since the October filing, Cleveland television Channel 3 WKYC
obtained and posted a video clip of the strip search at:
http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=82447

The Cleveland station featured the incident on its Thursday night
news program and also was to air a second part Friday night.

The couple demands a trial by jury with damages for medical care,
incurred bills and future expenses, while demanding judgment in an
amount in excess of the courts jurisdictional minimum; punitive
damages to be determined at trial; equitable relief; attorney's fees,
costs of action and other associate costs; and any and all other
relief the court deem equitable, necessary and just.
Guest
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:50 pm
On Feb 4, 2:22 am, Curly Surmudgeon <Curly.is....@home.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 19:32:42 -0800, hhc314 wrote:
On Feb 2, 8:35 pm, Curly Surmudgeon <Curly.is....@home.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:35:05 -0800, knews4u2chew wrote:
http://podblanc.com/?q=node/13519

The inmates are running the Asylum.

Natural progression when the police become militarized.  Nobody should
be surprised.  Beat cops aren't hired for intelligence, to the contrary
they are hired for obedience.  Again, don't blame the grunts, blame the
policy makers and leaders.

-- Regards, Curly

Curly, I tend to agree with your post, but do not fail to realize that
many of those beat cops become more savy than many technical professionals
about what takes place on the streets. I seriously admire the vast
majority of them, since they are the very first to come to your help when
you seriously need help.

"IS," Intelligence Savy, is different than Intelligence Quotient or
Emotional Quotient.  I'll agree that IS is an important tool in "law"
enforcement and that the majority of cops are trying to do the right
thing as they believe it to be.

Three of my cousins were cops, good cops, now retired.  One has been shot
another lost 85% use of his left forearm in the line of duty.  I'm not
anti-cop, I'm anti-cowboy.

With good  leaders and direction this shit wouldn't be happening.





Boston's beat cops and traffic cops are noted for being tough, and not
good guys to fool around with. They seem to have this unique ability to
judge people by simply looking at them, than does a trained psychologist
with years of experience. I live in the 'burbs, but when in Boston City
(as we 'burb dwellers call it), our family has had only 3 encounters
with the guys that police the streets...all beneficial. The undercover
police that protect the Farmer's Market and Quincy Market are also
spectacular. No need to go into the details.

Now I have not been able to view the link that knews4u2c posted, but I
am quite sure that what took place was appropriate to the curcumstances
at hand, since the press is notorious for not mentioning all the
details. This is not just on blind faith, but what police officers are
going to risk all of their career benefits (and frankly, these are about
as good as benefits and retirements get), for breaking a rule. Quite
likely, some factor that went unmentioned in the article justified a
strip search.

Perhaps I'm reading more into this than was implied but my take on the
video was that they though she was suicidal and removed her clothing to
prevent hanging herself.  That's a ridiculous assumption but the kind that
might cause such a scenario.  Then they fucked up the proceedure by using
force and male officers with other males looking on.

Remember, this lady _called_ the police _herself_!  Her "crime" was giving
the office her dead sister's drivers license when asked for hers.  Given
that she was already terrified (she called 911 remember) and probably not
thinking clearly her explanation was reasonable and she had no reason to
lie about her identity, she was a wife and homemaker.

The cops made a huge blunder, they became a mob attacking a 125lb woman.
Those cops, their department, the municipality, the mayor, and the janitor
are going to pay big-time.

This is a natural outcome with recent moves by the feds to militarize our
local police forces.  Arming them with helicopters, chemical weapons,
rubber bullets, tazers, bean bag shotguns, stun grenades, M-14's,
warranteless searches, and training to abuse all these new toys.

This kind of crime was/is inevitable, pre-ordained.  It's not the cops
fault, its the leaders who put draconian laws into effect, fascists into
office, and use fear to cow the populace.  Illegal laws too, nobody should
submit to bad law or police authority misused or misplaced.

Ultimately the fault is those who voted these politicians into power.

I have no way of knowing if it did, but I do have a
neighbor who is a police officer, and he definitely hold the view that
you never want to get closer to an offender than duty requires. This
risk of contracting some disease or being charged with abuse of
authority is simply too great. That makes simple sense to me.

I had a cop neighbor too, the bad kind.  Had the whole neighborhood
intimidated.  No longer do I want one as a neighbor.  The risk of peace
and tranquility is just too great.

Let's not be inclined to pass judgement until we know ALL of the facts,
and right now I know none of them except knews4u2c's headline, which if
it is similar to the majority of his posts is not very credible.

Harry C.

In this case police action is so over the top that facts aren't relevant.
There is no excuse for this brutality.

-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Osama didn't win, Bush lost.  Strike that,  Osama didn't win, _we_ lost.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Curly, that may very well be true, but I have not yet read the police
reports, only the reports from the mediat which have been knon to tend
to spin and distort the facts.

Before passing judgement, I would prefer to know what ALL of the facts
are.

Harry C.
Curly Surmudgeon
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:44 am
Guest
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:50:36 -0800, hhc314 wrote:

Quote:
On Feb 4, 2:22 am, Curly Surmudgeon <Curly.is....@home.com> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 19:32:42 -0800, hhc314 wrote:
On Feb 2, 8:35 pm, Curly Surmudgeon <Curly.is....@home.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:35:05 -0800, knews4u2chew wrote:
http://podblanc.com/?q=node/13519

The inmates are running the Asylum.

Natural progression when the police become militarized.  Nobody
should be surprised.  Beat cops aren't hired for intelligence, to
the contrary they are hired for obedience.  Again, don't blame the
grunts, blame the policy makers and leaders.

-- Regards, Curly

Curly, I tend to agree with your post, but do not fail to realize that
many of those beat cops become more savy than many technical
professionals about what takes place on the streets. I seriously
admire the vast majority of them, since they are the very first to
come to your help when you seriously need help.

"IS," Intelligence Savy, is different than Intelligence Quotient or
Emotional Quotient.  I'll agree that IS is an important tool in "law"
enforcement and that the majority of cops are trying to do the right
thing as they believe it to be.

Three of my cousins were cops, good cops, now retired.  One has been
shot another lost 85% use of his left forearm in the line of duty.  I'm
not anti-cop, I'm anti-cowboy.

With good  leaders and direction this shit wouldn't be happening.





Boston's beat cops and traffic cops are noted for being tough, and not
good guys to fool around with. They seem to have this unique ability
to judge people by simply looking at them, than does a trained
psychologist with years of experience. I live in the 'burbs, but when
in Boston City (as we 'burb dwellers call it), our family has had only
3 encounters with the guys that police the streets...all beneficial.
The undercover police that protect the Farmer's Market and Quincy
Market are also spectacular. No need to go into the details.

Now I have not been able to view the link that knews4u2c posted, but I
am quite sure that what took place was appropriate to the
curcumstances at hand, since the press is notorious for not mentioning
all the details. This is not just on blind faith, but what police
officers are going to risk all of their career benefits (and frankly,
these are about as good as benefits and retirements get), for breaking
a rule. Quite likely, some factor that went unmentioned in the article
justified a strip search.

Perhaps I'm reading more into this than was implied but my take on the
video was that they though she was suicidal and removed her clothing to
prevent hanging herself.  That's a ridiculous assumption but the kind
that might cause such a scenario.  Then they fucked up the proceedure
by using force and male officers with other males looking on.

Remember, this lady _called_ the police _herself_!  Her "crime" was
giving the office her dead sister's drivers license when asked for hers.
 Given that she was already terrified (she called 911 remember) and
probably not thinking clearly her explanation was reasonable and she had
no reason to lie about her identity, she was a wife and homemaker.

The cops made a huge blunder, they became a mob attacking a 125lb woman.
Those cops, their department, the municipality, the mayor, and the
janitor are going to pay big-time.

This is a natural outcome with recent moves by the feds to militarize
our local police forces.  Arming them with helicopters, chemical
weapons, rubber bullets, tazers, bean bag shotguns, stun grenades,
M-14's, warranteless searches, and training to abuse all these new toys.

This kind of crime was/is inevitable, pre-ordained.  It's not the cops
fault, its the leaders who put draconian laws into effect, fascists into
office, and use fear to cow the populace.  Illegal laws too, nobody
should submit to bad law or police authority misused or misplaced.

Ultimately the fault is those who voted these politicians into power.

I have no way of knowing if it did, but I do have a neighbor who is a
police officer, and he definitely hold the view that you never want to
get closer to an offender than duty requires. This risk of contracting
some disease or being charged with abuse of authority is simply too
great. That makes simple sense to me.

I had a cop neighbor too, the bad kind.  Had the whole neighborhood
intimidated.  No longer do I want one as a neighbor.  The risk of
peace and tranquility is just too great.

Let's not be inclined to pass judgement until we know ALL of the
facts, and right now I know none of them except knews4u2c's headline,
which if it is similar to the majority of his posts is not very
credible.

Harry C.

In this case police action is so over the top that facts aren't
relevant. There is no excuse for this brutality.

-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Osama didn't win, Bush lost.  Strike that,  Osama didn't win, _we_
lost.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Curly, that may very well be true, but I have not yet read the police
reports, only the reports from the mediat which have been knon to tend to
spin and distort the facts.

Before passing judgement, I would prefer to know what ALL of the facts
are.

Harry C.

Best idea of all. Let me know of the facts change. I'm leaving soon for
a very long trip of 7-10 days.

-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Osama didn't win, Bush lost. Strike that, Osama didn't win, _we_ lost.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 6:41 pm
On Feb 2, 11:35 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
Quote:
http://podblanc.com/?q=node/13519

The inmates are running the Asylum.

Then again, she could'a just gone out for coffee...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article3321637.ece
 
Page 3 of 3    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:35 am