|
Science Forum Index » Geology - Earthquakes Forum » Small EQ in Wyoming
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Flipper |
 Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:58 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
If you plug the following into Google Earth, you will find that the EQ
is at the southern end of the proposed magma chamber of Yellowstone
Park, and the formation above the epicenter is the shape of a vent or
possibly a lava dome. The 3.1 event is only 3 miles deep. Very
interesting. When you get to the location, give the picture some tilt
for perspective. 43.441¡N, 110.509¡W |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:21 pm |
|
|
|
|
In article <cjf9i3llh1r2jurfo06rcu12jd0av79ha3@4ax.com>,
Flipper <KidsTasteGood@anytime.alt> wrote:
Quote: If you plug the following into Google Earth, you will find that the EQ
is at the southern end of the proposed magma chamber of Yellowstone
Park, and the formation above the epicenter is the shape of a vent or
possibly a lava dome. The 3.1 event is only 3 miles deep. Very
interesting. When you get to the location, give the picture some tilt
for perspective. 43.441¡N, 110.509¡W
Gee, a small quake at Yellowstone. How exciting.
--
http://yosemitephotos.net/main.php?g2_itemId=32 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Weatherlawyer |
| Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 28, 8:21 pm, el...@no.spam () wrote:
Quote:
Gee, a small quake at Yellowstone. How exciting.
--http://yosemitephotos.net/main.php?g2_itemId=32
Tell me what is really spoiling your life. I know there is something
disappointing in you that just can't master.
Maybe it's your little name or something else small? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:11 am |
|
|
|
|
In article <1193610247.444998.88620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
Weatherlawyer <Weatherlawyer@hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote: Tell me what is really spoiling your life. I know there is something
disappointing in you that just can't master.
Sorry, your little game isn't going to work
Quote: Maybe it's your little name or something else small?
You poor baby. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
