Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Physics - Electromagnetic Forum  »  Liénard-Wiechert Electric Potential
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
blackhead
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 4:33 pm
Guest
The retarded electric potential is:

Phi (_r, t) = volume_integral (volume, [ p(_r') ] / R, dv') (1)

Where:

_r is the radius vector to the observation point
_r' is the radius vector to a volume element of charge density at t- R/
c
R = | _r - _r' |
[ p(_r') ] = p(_r', t - R/c) is the charge density at _r' evaluated at
t - R/c


Standard text books on classical EM use this result to get the Liénard-
Wiechert electric potential for a moving charge as:


Phi (r, t) = q / [ R - B._R ]

where:

_u = d/dt _r'

_R = r - r', _B = _u/c

[ ] is evaluated at t - R/c


Quote:
From (1), [ p(_r')] = q at r' = location of the charge, so I don't
understand why (1) shouldn't immediately simplify to:


Phi (_r, t) = q / [ R ]. Can anyone enlighten me?

Thanks.
blackhead
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:40 pm
Guest
On 3 Sep, 22:33, blackhead <larryhar...@softhome.net> wrote:
Quote:
The retarded electric potential is:

Phi (_r, t) = volume_integral (volume, [ p(_r') ] / R, dv') (1)

Where:

_r is the radius vector to the observation point
_r' is the radius vector to a volume element of charge density at t- R/
c
R = | _r - _r' |
[ p(_r') ] = p(_r', t - R/c) is the charge density at _r' evaluated at
t - R/c

Standard text books on classical EM use this result to get the Liénard-
Wiechert electric potential for a moving charge as:

Phi (r, t) = q / [ R - B._R ]

where:

_u = d/dt _r'

_R = r - r', _B = _u/c

[ ] is evaluated at t - R/c

From (1), [ p(_r')] = q at r' = location of the charge, so I don't

understand why (1) shouldn't immediately simplify to:



Quote:
Phi (_r, t) = q / [ R ]. Can anyone enlighten me?

Sorry for the stupididty, this is only true when _u = 0.



> Thanks.
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:32 am