| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Physics - Electromagnetic Forum » precise direction of a radio signal?
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Joe Strout |
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 2:25 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Is it possible to determine the direction of a radio signal instantly,
i.e. without having to sweep some directional antenna? Perhaps by using
several orthogonal antennas, for example?
If it helps, here's the particular application I have in mind: I'm
wondering about something that could be embedded in a handheld device
which would determine the direction to the nearest WiFi (802.11) base
station(s). If it could simultaneously get a bearing to two or more
base stations, and the position of those base stations were known, then
it could could determine its own position and orientation.
Where would this fall on the scale from "trivial" to "requires magic"?
Thanks,
- Joe |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Wimpie |
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 3:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 29 mayo, 21:25, Joe Strout <j...@strout.net> wrote:
Quote: Is it possible to determine the direction of a radio signal instantly,
i.e. without having to sweep some directional antenna? Perhaps by using
several orthogonal antennas, for example?
If it helps, here's the particular application I have in mind: I'm
wondering about something that could be embedded in a handheld device
which would determine the direction to the nearest WiFi (802.11) base
station(s). If it could simultaneously get a bearing to two or more
base stations, and the position of those base stations were known, then
it could could determine its own position and orientation.
Where would this fall on the scale from "trivial" to "requires magic"?
Thanks,
- Joe
Hello Joe,
Instantaneous DF is possible and done for many years. You are right
it uses several antennas and determines the Direction Of Arrival based
on the phase differences between the received signals via the
antennas.
There are practical problems, you will have reflections that cause
phase errors and will give problems when you want to carry out an
exact calculation. When you use many antennas, and lots of
mathematics, you are able to detect several wave fronts. Based on the
behavior of the several wave fronts (DOA and strength) you can
estimate the direct wave front.
You may search for MUSIC algorithm to get additional info. It requires
"magic" when you want high accuracy and good functioning in an multi-
path environment.
Best regards,
Wim
PA3DJS |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 3:25 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joe Strout <joe@strout.net> wrote:
Quote: Is it possible to determine the direction of a radio signal instantly,
i.e. without having to sweep some directional antenna? Perhaps by using
several orthogonal antennas, for example?
If it helps, here's the particular application I have in mind: I'm
wondering about something that could be embedded in a handheld device
which would determine the direction to the nearest WiFi (802.11) base
station(s). If it could simultaneously get a bearing to two or more
base stations, and the position of those base stations were known, then
it could could determine its own position and orientation.
Where would this fall on the scale from "trivial" to "requires magic"?
At that frequency, some where about you REALLY have to know what
you are doing.
I'd suggest a google search on radio direction finding to get a feel
for all the different techniques.
One problem is at that frequency it is a bitch to get most of them
to work.
The simplist is a small (and at that frequency it will be small)
directonal antenna you sweep by hand.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Joe Strout |
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 10:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <dbeui4-m9h.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
wrote:
Quote: At that frequency, some where about you REALLY have to know what
you are doing.
I'd suggest a google search on radio direction finding to get a feel
for all the different techniques.
Thanks. I didn't even know what keywords to search on before, but now
I'm finding a lot of useful resources.
I see that what I had imagined is something like the Watson-Watt
technique, but there are many others.
If we have control over the fixed transmitters (which is a possibility
for my application, albeit a much more expensive one), then something
like the aircraft VOR technique might be even better -- it seems like
that puts the expense onto the transmitters, rather than onto the
receivers, which is where I'd rather have it. But VOR only worked with
a direct line of sight; if that's always true for this technique, then
it won't do, as I need something that can work in and among buildings,
trees, etc.
Quote: One problem is at that frequency it is a bitch to get most of them
to work.
I bet.
Quote: The simplist is a small (and at that frequency it will be small)
directonal antenna you sweep by hand.
True, but I need something automatic that can update at 30 Hz or more.
Maybe a pseudo-doppler technique, with a circular array of antennas?
Thanks,
- Joe |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 11:25 pm |
|
|
|
|
Joe Strout <joe@strout.net> wrote:
Quote: In article <dbeui4-m9h.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
wrote:
At that frequency, some where about you REALLY have to know what
you are doing.
I'd suggest a google search on radio direction finding to get a feel
for all the different techniques.
Thanks. I didn't even know what keywords to search on before, but now
I'm finding a lot of useful resources.
I see that what I had imagined is something like the Watson-Watt
technique, but there are many others.
If we have control over the fixed transmitters (which is a possibility
for my application, albeit a much more expensive one), then something
like the aircraft VOR technique might be even better -- it seems like
that puts the expense onto the transmitters, rather than onto the
receivers, which is where I'd rather have it. But VOR only worked with
a direct line of sight; if that's always true for this technique, then
it won't do, as I need something that can work in and among buildings,
trees, etc.
Making a VOR work is non-trivial.
I'd suggest some research in how the transmitter end works before
making any leaps.
Quote: One problem is at that frequency it is a bitch to get most of them
to work.
I bet.
The simplist is a small (and at that frequency it will be small)
directonal antenna you sweep by hand.
True, but I need something automatic that can update at 30 Hz or more.
Maybe a pseudo-doppler technique, with a circular array of antennas?
The big problem at those frequencies is getting signal switching to
work.
Sure, it can be done, but do you have the resourses?
A couple of good places to look for practical information on this kind
of thing is the ARRL (www.arrl.org the American HAM organization) and
the RSGB (www.rsgb.org the UK HAM organization).
Finding hidden transmitters is big amongst HAMS.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:21 pm
|
|