| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Medicine - Dentistry Forum » WHY ARE WE STILL INSERTING MERCURY IN TEETH AND MUSCLES?
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Jan Drew |
 Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 12:29 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Show suggestion - WHY ARE WE STILL INSERTING MERCURY IN TEETH AND MUSCLES
We have taken mercury out of batteries, light switches, thermometers and
just about everything except dentists still pack it in your teeth and if you
get a flu vaccine you will get an nice jolt of ethyl mercury (thimerosal)
unless you are knowledgeable enough to demand and pay extra for one without
mercury. An if you do so you may make your doctor or nurse mad at your
stupidity
We have taken mercury out of most childhood vaccines except flu, The CDC and
IOM pretend that mercury is not the cause of our autism epidemic but there
is lots to prove they are wrong including a recent criticism from the NIH.
Mercury is one hundred times more neuro toxic the lead and yet we mimic the
Romans who knew lead was poisonous but thought a little bit was ok in food
etc. See a good summary of roman use of lead:
http://www.epa.gov/history/topics/perspect/lead.htm.
If you want more details I have put a few websites below and attached a
document I prepared over a decade ago for a case against the FDA over its
failure to properly regulate dental mercury. Also attached are several other
documents and I can send many more.
This story is current because of the "unknown" cause of autism and the
Federal Courts refusal to assert jurisdiction over the FDA - the same Court
found jurisdiction in 1993 but ignored their own case law dismissing for
failure to exhaust administrative remedies. I cannot find my PDF of the 2007
Opinion and therefore have not attached it but if interested can get it to
you.
There is lots of obfuscation by the dental and medical establishment which
call all be refuted. I have worked on this for twenty five years and have
too much information. Will be glad to send more.
In the past publicity has been very sporadic. For instance the FDA had a
hearing Sept 6-7, 2006 at which time the Joint Panels reused the FDA's
position dental mercury is safe by a vote of 14 to 6. This was reported but
not nearly as widely as the FDA's "White Paper" of the week before asserting
that mercury in fillings is safe.
The most knowledgeable scientist on our side is Boyd Haley, PhD.,
859-388-9445 ext 202. Freya Koss is a very knowledgeable victim of mercury
from fillings. Amy Carson ( http://www.MomsAgainstMercury.org ) is a leader
in the fight of parents for their autistic children and to stop the harm.
Copies of their email addresses are above. I know all these people on our
side of the argument and can give you more.
The ADA, CDC and IOM have several spokespersons. There are tapes of their
testimony at Congressman Richard Burton's hearings. I can give you many more
names.
This is really several stories of the biggest iatrogenic disaster of modern
times - disease, cover ups and maybe fraud. For instances there is a strong
scientific argument that mercury is a major factor in Alzheimer's
Bob
Robert E. Reeves
REEVES LAW OFFICE
167 West Main St., Suite 1310
Lexington, KY 40507
O) 859-226-0700, Fax-0711
YouTube - Quecksilber the strange story of dental amalgam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfVsUuhoFWY#6JQGgGvCixA
http://www.toxicteeth.org/
IAMOT.ORG
--------------------------- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:22 pm
|
|