Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Anthropology - Paleo Forum  »  Early apes were parttime bipeds
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Marc Verhaegen
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:32 pm
Guest
Quote:
"...To walk upright is to be human. At
least that's what paleoanthropologists
have thought for decades. But now,
researchers have observed orangutans
walking in a way that resembles human
locomotion--albeit along the branches
of trees. This suggests that the earliest
stages of upright walking evolved in apes
living in the trees rather than in
hominids walking on the ground, according
to primatologist Robin Crompton of the
University of Liverpool, U.K., co-author
of the report in tomorrow's
issue of Science..."
http://tinyurl.com/2cl2m7

Thanks a lot, m3d.

SKS Thorpe, RL Holder & RH Crompton 2007
"Origin of human bipedalism as an adaptation for locomotion on flexible
branches"
Science 316:1328-31

Human bipedalism is commonly thought to have evolved from a quadrupedal
terrestrial precursor, yet some recent paleontological evidence suggests
that adaptations for bipedalism arose in an arboreal context. However, the
adaptive benefit of arboreal bipedalism has been unknown. Here we show that
it allows the most arboreal great ape, the orangutan, to access supports too
flexible to be negotiated otherwise. Orangutans react to branch flexibility
like humans running on springy tracks, by increasing knee and hip extension,
whereas all other primates do the reverse. Human bipedalism is thus less an
innovation than an exploitation of a locomotor behavior retained from the
common great ape ancestor.
____

Gibbons walk bipedally over branches, orangs do this sometime it now
appears, so perhaps the early apes already did this, but all this does not
explain why no monkeys do this. In any case, it seems to suggest that the
early hominoids were already (parttime) bipedal: wading? branch-hanging?
(from which walking bipedally over branches as in gibbons & orangs & other
apes could have evolved).

Orangs don't knuckle-walk: on the ground (seldom), they walk on the "heels"
of the hand: they fist-walk (with the fingers +-flexed, usu.on the lateral
side of the hand) or palm-walk (with the fingers +-extended).
KWing (Pan & Gorilla) is very derived, in fact more derived than
(short-legged) bipedality as seen in all hominoids now & then. KWing (on
the dorsal side of the hand) can't evolve directly from palmigrady (on the
ventral side of the hand), so there must have been an intermediary phase:
short-legged bipedality in early hominoids, eg, for wading in swamp forests,
where the fossil apes are found. Arm-hanging (alone) does not explain KWing,
since gibbons & orangs & human infants palm-walk.

--Marc Verhaegen
http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/outthere.htm
http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/Symposium.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT
Lee Olsen
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:30 pm
Guest
On Jun 1, 11:32 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:

Quote:
"...To walk upright is to be human.

ROFL, let's see an orang make a hand axe, or get 50 flakes from a
single core.
Clipper the Horse
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:06 am
Guest
Marc Verhaegen wrote:

Quote:
"...To walk upright is to be human. At
least that's what paleoanthropologists
have thought for decades. But now,
researchers have observed orangutans
walking in a way that resembles human
locomotion--albeit along the branches
of trees. This suggests that the earliest
stages of upright walking evolved in apes
living in the trees rather than in
hominids walking on the ground, according
to primatologist Robin Crompton of the
University of Liverpool, U.K., co-author
of the report in tomorrow's
issue of Science..."
http://tinyurl.com/2cl2m7

Thanks a lot, m3d.

SKS Thorpe, RL Holder & RH Crompton 2007
"Origin of human bipedalism as an adaptation for locomotion on flexible
branches"
Science 316:1328-31

Human bipedalism is commonly thought to have evolved from a quadrupedal
terrestrial precursor, yet some recent paleontological evidence suggests
that adaptations for bipedalism arose in an arboreal context. However, the
adaptive benefit of arboreal bipedalism has been unknown. Here we show that
it allows the most arboreal great ape, the orangutan, to access supports too
flexible to be negotiated otherwise. Orangutans react to branch flexibility
like humans running on springy tracks, by increasing knee and hip extension,
whereas all other primates do the reverse. Human bipedalism is thus less an
innovation than an exploitation of a locomotor behavior retained from the
common great ape ancestor.
____

Gibbons walk bipedally over branches, orangs do this sometime it now
appears, so perhaps the early apes already did this, but all this does not
explain why no monkeys do this. In any case, it seems to suggest that the
early hominoids were already (parttime) bipedal: wading? branch-hanging?
(from which walking bipedally over branches as in gibbons & orangs & other
apes could have evolved).

Orangs don't knuckle-walk: on the ground (seldom), they walk on the "heels"
of the hand: they fist-walk (with the fingers +-flexed, usu.on the lateral
side of the hand) or palm-walk (with the fingers +-extended).
KWing (Pan & Gorilla) is very derived, in fact more derived than
(short-legged) bipedality as seen in all hominoids now & then. KWing (on
the dorsal side of the hand) can't evolve directly from palmigrady (on the
ventral side of the hand), so there must have been an intermediary phase:
short-legged bipedality in early hominoids, eg, for wading in swamp forests,
where the fossil apes are found. Arm-hanging (alone) does not explain KWing,
since gibbons & orangs & human infants palm-walk.

--Marc Verhaegen
http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/outthere.htm
http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/Symposium.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT




superfluous!
Marc Verhaegen
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:43 am
Guest
Op 02-06-2007 01:30, in artikel
1180740608.965388.311240@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com, Lee Olsen
<paleocity@hotmail.com> schreef:

Quote:
On Jun 1, 11:32 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:

"...To walk upright is to be human.

Who said that nonsense? Ever heard of penguins?

Quote:
ROFL, let's see an orang make a hand axe, or get 50 flakes from a
single core.

??
What on earth has walking upright to do with using tools IYO??

Most bipeds = dinos, birds, kangaroos... don't use tools.
Most tool-using animals can't be called bipedal: capuchins, chimps,
sea-otters.
Of the animals that walk upright (penguins... others?), only Hs uses tools
AFAIK.

Got it?

(no!)
Lee Olsen
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:06 am
Guest
On Jun 2, 2:43 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
Quote:
Op 02-06-2007 01:30, in artikel
1180740608.965388.311...@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com, Lee Olsen
paleoc...@hotmail.com> schreef:

On Jun 1, 11:32 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
"...To walk upright is to be human.

Who said that nonsense? Ever heard of penguins?


That was my point, doughboy. Are you a parrot now? Try to think for
yourself.
Quote:

ROFL, let's see an orang make a hand axe, or get 50 flakes from a
single core.

??
What on earth has walking upright to do with using tools IYO??

Did I say "tools" you delusional-side-show freak? Too ignorant to use
attribution marks? Paraphrasing, lies, and wooden-man arguments are
all you have.

Quote:

Most bipeds = dinos, birds,



kangaroos... don't use tools.
Quote:
Most tool-using animals can't be called bipedal: capuchins, chimps,
sea-otters.
Of the animals that walk upright (penguins... others?), only Hs uses tools
AFAIK.

Try to be relevant to what was actually said, doughboy, not what you
made up.

Quote:

Got it?

You are an idiot.
Quote:

(no!)

yes
Rich Travsky
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:12 pm
Guest
Marc Verhaegen wrote:
Quote:

"...To walk upright is to be human. At
least that's what paleoanthropologists
have thought for decades. But now,
researchers have observed orangutans
walking in a way that resembles human
locomotion--albeit along the branches
of trees. This suggests that the earliest
stages of upright walking evolved in apes
living in the trees rather than in
hominids walking on the ground, according
to primatologist Robin Crompton of the
University of Liverpool, U.K., co-author
of the report in tomorrow's
issue of Science..."
http://tinyurl.com/2cl2m7

Thanks a lot, m3d.

SKS Thorpe, RL Holder & RH Crompton 2007
"Origin of human bipedalism as an adaptation for locomotion on flexible
branches"
Science 316:1328-31

Human bipedalism is commonly thought to have evolved from a quadrupedal
terrestrial precursor, yet some recent paleontological evidence suggests
that adaptations for bipedalism arose in an arboreal context. However, the
adaptive benefit of arboreal bipedalism has been unknown. Here we show that
it allows the most arboreal great ape, the orangutan, to access supports too
flexible to be negotiated otherwise. Orangutans react to branch flexibility
like humans running on springy tracks, by increasing knee and hip extension,
whereas all other primates do the reverse. Human bipedalism is thus less an
innovation than an exploitation of a locomotor behavior retained from the
common great ape ancestor.

Almost borders on being "old news". Bwindi project:

http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~stanford/bigape.html
The Bwindi-Impenetrable Great Ape Project
...
A second recent finding is that Bwindi chimpanzees are more bipedal in
posture, at least when feeding in trees, than other documented chimpanzee
populations. During May, 2001, while feeding in Ficus sp., the Ruhija
chimpanzees foraged in the tree bipedally (standing on the largest terminal
branches) more often in a ten day period than other studies have recorded in a
year or more. A total of 38.5 hours of observational data were collected on
20 individuals, during which 78 instances of bipedalism by nine individuals
were recorded, an average of 0.49 bouts per observation hour for the entire
community. All bipedalism occurred arboreally on the larger limbs of the Ficus
natalensis, and all instances occurred in a fig-fruit feeding context.
Individuals varied widely in their tendency to be bipedal, as well as the
average duration of their bipedal bouts. One male was bipedal at least 24
times in approximately 20 contact hours. The sample included four adult males
and four adult females; males were bipedal significantly more often than
females. A manuscript about this behavior is currently in preparation.
...

http://www.trussel.com/prehist/news283.htm
The Japan Times
December 1, 2001

Mankind learned to walk while living in trees, scientists believe
...
But now a group of scientists has proposed a controversial theory which maintains
our upright ability is far more ancient than supposed. They also claim we picked
up our two-footed prowess while living in trees. The skills of soccer player David
Beckham and dancer Michael Flatley can be traced to this ancient arboreal event.

"Trees were an ideal nursery for the learning of human walking," says Robin Compton
of Liverpool University. "They enable an animal to balance itself. They can reach
out in any direction, above and below themselves, and find branches. Orangutans do
just this sort of thing."
...

Quote:
____

Gibbons walk bipedally over branches, orangs do this sometime it now
appears, so perhaps the early apes already did this, but all this does not
explain why no monkeys do this. In any case, it seems to suggest that the
early hominoids were already (parttime) bipedal: wading? branch-hanging?
(from which walking bipedally over branches as in gibbons & orangs & other
apes could have evolved).

Orangs don't knuckle-walk: on the ground (seldom), they walk on the "heels"
of the hand: they fist-walk (with the fingers +-flexed, usu.on the lateral
side of the hand) or palm-walk (with the fingers +-extended).
KWing (Pan & Gorilla) is very derived, in fact more derived than
(short-legged) bipedality as seen in all hominoids now & then. KWing (on
the dorsal side of the hand) can't evolve directly from palmigrady (on the
ventral side of the hand), so there must have been an intermediary phase:
short-legged bipedality in early hominoids, eg, for wading in swamp forests,
where the fossil apes are found. Arm-hanging (alone) does not explain KWing,
since gibbons & orangs & human infants palm-walk.
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:22 pm