Simplification - Tom Bearden
And 'Free Energy'
By Leslie R. Pastor
2-29-7
The crux of Tom Bearden's published work, ultimately, is to reveal
that the current 'energy' system is and has been deliberately flawed
and curtailed preventing the acquisition of using 'free and abundant'
sources of energy freely from the 'vacuum of space-time.' Most people
presume that 'energy' is 'created' by the power companies and then
transferred along a grid line directly into your homes and places of
business. Nothing could be further from the truth, and, because it is
true, has been deliberately hidden from the general public, academia,
and our current electrical engineering schools.
Tom Bearden explains: The real problem is, of all things, the sadly
flawed old electrical engineering model. That horrible model used
today was put together by Oliver Heaviside and others in the 1880s
after James Clerk Maxwell was already dead (in 1879). Today it is
actually Heaviside's highly reduced vector equations, further severely
reduced by Lorentz in 1892 and in 1900. Most EE's have never even seen
Maxwell's actual theory (in quaternion-like mathematics) of 20
equations in 20 unknowns. They are lied to and told they are studying
"Maxwell's theory", which actually is not taught in any of our
universities.
[Maxwell's theory is in J. C. Maxwell, "A Dynamical Theory of the
Electromagnetic Field," Royal Society Transactions, Vol. CLV, 1865, p
459. Read Dec. 8, 1864. Also in The Scientific Papers of James Clerk
Maxwell, 2 vols. bound as one, edited by W. D. Niven, Dover, New York,
1952, Vol. 1, p. 526-597. In this later papers collection, two errata
are given on the unnumbered page prior to page 1 of Vol. 1. In this
paper, Maxwell presents his seminal theory of electromagnetism,
containing 20 equations in 20 unknowns. His general equations of the
electromagnetic field are given in Part III, General Equations of the
Electromagnetic Field, p. 554-564. On p. 561, he lists his 20
variables. On p. 562, he summarizes the different subjects of the 20
equations, being three equations each for magnetic force, electric
currents, electromotive force, electric elasticity, electric
resistance, total currents; and one equation each for free electricity
and continuity. In the paper, Maxwell adopts the approach of first
arriving at the laws of induction and then deducing the mechanical
attractions and repulsions.]
http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/103001.htm
http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/Fact_Sheets/Fact%
20Sheet%20-%20Source%20Charge%20Problem10.doc
The suppression of Nikola Tesla - who, among other things, planned to
give free "energy from space" to the world - began in earnest in the
1890s, being directed by some of the most powerful men and
organizations on earth at the time. And as J. P. Morgan remarked, "You
can't put a meter on that!" (Tesla's free EM energy from space). Thus
Tesla had to go. He was fairly easily suppressed by simply cutting
down, and then cutting off, his funding. As is known, Tesla did in
fact later power an automobile directly with "energy from space". His
nephew who rode in the car with him, was still alive the last time I
checked.
Any system freely taking and using excess EM "energy from space" to
power itself or to produce more power in the loads than the operator
himself inputs and pays for, is an asymmetric
Maxwellian system a priori. As is known today since 1957, any dipole
is a broken symmetry - and that means that "something formerly
nonobservable (virtual) becomes observable". Any charge is also a
dipole, since it polarizes its surrounding virtual state vacuum with
opposite charge. Then it takes (absorbs) virtual state EM energy from
that seething virtual state vacuum medium, and re-emits it as real,
observable EM energy (real photons) in all directions."
Borrowing work previously done by Lorenz (without the "t"), Lorentz
(with the "t") further symmetrized the already sharply curtailed
Heaviside vector equations in 1892, thereby arbitrarily discarding all
asymmetrical Maxwellian systems. Nature did not and does not discard
them. Lorentz did, and all EE departments, professors, and textbooks
still blindly discard them to this very day by continuing to teach
only the symmetrize Heaviside-Lorentz equations.
So that symmetrization neatly discards all those Maxwellian systems
that could be built, and that would freely take excess energy from the
vacuum and use it to power or help power the loads. In short, it
discards all the COP>1.0 EFTV Maxwellian systems. Our electrical
engineers are taught to think, conceive, design, build, and deploy
only symmetrical systems that deliberately kill their own source of
freely flowing EM energy from the vacuum, faster than they can use a
bit of that energy to power the loads.
Think about it: circuits and current flow were deliberately designed
to 'kill the flow of energy' period, necessitating, the continuous use
of 'power generation' instead of relying upon the actual source of all
'energy.' The truth of the matter is, that, 'energy can neither be
created or destroyed,' all that really takes place is the 'change in
form of energy.' What the so-called 'power generator' does is to
create a 'dipole' (- and +) enabling the flow of energy to commence
from its source the 'vacuum of space-time.'
Tom Bearden explains: So we have to keep cranking the shaft of the
generator - not to power the loads, but to keep restoring the source
dipole inside the generator itself. Cranking the generator shaft has
nothing to do with furnishing the EM energy flow pouring from the
generator terminals and out into space along the conductors of the
external circuit. That out-flowing EM energy comes from the broken
symmetry of the opposite charges inside the generator - the
asymmetry of the source dipole - once the charges are forced apart.
The so-called "static" field or potential from any dipolarity is
comprised of a steady flow of real photons, whose energy has been
directly extracted from the seething virtual state vacuum by the
asymmetry of that dipole. Lee and Yang got the Nobel Prize in 1957 for
predicting broken symmetry - which was a giant revolution in physics.
And, quoting Nobelist Lee:
".the discoveries made in 1957 established not only right-left
asymmetry, but also the asymmetry between the positive and negative
signs of electric charge." [T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and
Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood Academy Publishers, Chur, New
York, and London, 1981, p. 184].
Think about it: What T. D. Lee discovered was that real 'energy' was
asymmetric and thus 'virtual' and therefore nonobservable in form and
substance. Energy only becomes symmetric and thus observable in our
dimension when it becomes 'observable' as 'charge.' Again, quoting Tom
Bearden, " Any charge is also a dipole, since it polarizes its
surrounding virtual state vacuum with opposite charge. Then it takes
(absorbs) virtual state EM energy from that seething virtual state
vacuum medium, and re-emits it as real, observable EM energy (real
photons) in all directions."
Again, T. D. Lee explains: "Since nonobservables imply symmetry, any
discovery of asymmetry must imply some observable. The experiment of
Wu, Ambler, Hayward, Hoppes and Hudson. established the asymmetry
between the positive and negative signs of electricity." [T. D. Lee,
Symmetries, Asymmetries, and the World of Particles, U. Wash. Press,
Seattle, 1988, p. 11]. And also clarifies: ".the violation of symmetry
arises whenever what was thought to be a non-observable turns out to
be [now] actually an observable." [T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and
Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood Academy Publishers, Chur, New
York, and London, 1981, p. 181].
Thus we now know that, the vacuum can indeed be "engineered" to form
energy structures and dynamics, by forming those energy structures as
dynamic forces in matter, then removing the interacting matter.
In the 50 years since the discovery of broken symmetry and the award
of the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang for having predicted this great
revolution in physics, the implications of broken symmetry of the
source dipolarity inside the electrical power generator has not made
it across the university campus from the physics department to the EE
department. Most EEs still do not understand the difference between
symmetry and asymmetry. As Nobelist Lee points out, when you have a
broken symmetry you have the case where something virtual has become
observable. In short, the broken symmetry of the source dipole
(separated opposite charges) inside every generator and battery
already freely absorbs virtual energy from the seething vacuum,
integrates it coherently to quantum level, and remits the energy as
real, observable EM energy. So any "source" dipolarity - including any
"isolated" charge and its associated vacuum polarization - unceasingly
pours out real, usable EM energy in the form of observable photons.
And it extracts all that energy directly from its virtual state vacuum
interaction. All charges and dipoles in the universe do this, and they
have done it since their creation some 14 or so billion years ago.
Once formed, if the source dipole is left alone and intact, and not
destroyed, it will continue to pour out real, free, usable EM energy
till the end of time.
The reality is that, there is no "energy" crisis and there never has
been. There is an "energy from fuel" crisis because our electrical
engineers deliberately use only symmetrical interception and
collection circuits that destroy their source dipoles (and their free
flow of energy from the vacuum) faster than they use some of it to
power the loads. So we have to keep consuming fuel etc., in order to
keep restoring the dipole (- and +). There is a fuel crisis hence
there is an "energy from fuel" crisis!
That is why we have to keep cranking the shaft of the generator - not
to power the grid and the loads, but to keep restoring the source
dipolarity (- and +) inside the generator, that the completely inane
symmetrical systems built by our EEs continually destroy faster than
they power their loads.
Tom Bearden to be continued...
Research:
Tom Bearden
http://www.cheniere.org/
http://www.cheniere.org/toc.html
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:Motionless_Electromagnetic_Generator
Perendev
http://www.perendev-power.com/index.htm
My Own Personal Research Pages
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Congress:Member:Leslie_R._Pastor
