Subject: Re: Lunar Craters
From: "Louis Hissink"
ljurrasic@optushome.com.au
Date: 12/11/03 9:49 PM Hawaiian Standard Time
Message-id: <3fd972f7$0$18749$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au
"George" <george@george.net> wrote in message
news:T4eCb.1802$z24.916@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Louis Hissink" <ljurrasic@optushome.com.au> wrote in message
news:3fd96cbe$0$18750$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
Stuart,
You have not posted one specific scientific objection to any of the
posts
I
have made
This is a typical Kook response, not scientific
LH
One does not need to post specific objections to a kooky post. It
stands
or
falls on its own merit. Hence the silence.
All Nobel Laureates Please Stand in Silence, including Hannes Alfven and
I.
Langmuir.
Name dropping will not help kooky theories.
Please provide an actual reference to scientific literature where Hannes
Alfven
proposed that electrical discharges produced structures like large
craters.
Links to kook sites invoking his name do not count.
But this is typical of kook argumentation. Plasma phyiscs is real. Nobody
disputes that plasmas exist or Alfven's theorem for that matter.
However, that does not lend credibility to the idea that lunar craters,
for
example, are formed by electrical discharges.
And yes Louis I am as comfortable in EM theory and Alfvens' theorem as I
am in
Newtonian mechanics.
The maths don't elude me. THey simply don't help you.
Stuart
Dr. Stuart A. Weinstein
Ewa Beach Institute of Tectonics
"To err is human, but to really foul things up
requires a creationist"
