| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Psychology - Psychotherapy Forum » Tony Blair
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| linkspider |
 Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:18 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Tony Blair is under criticism for considering to grant the Catholic
Church an exemption regarding adoption for homosexual couples and its
refusal of acceptance when making an application on the grounds of
homosexuality. Now I previously wrote an article and in this article I
was discussing the need for consideration of the opinion and action
towards homosexuality. Is it wrong to have the thought that
homosexuality is unacceptable or is it wrong to act on the thought
that homosexuality is unacceptable. What I am trying to express is
that thought in the mind about homosexuality being unfavourable,
undesirable and unnatural is not the same as failing to seek and
deliver civil equality. It is not the thought that is wrong but our
actions from our thoughts. Everybody has thoughts about homosexuality,
even if you are heterosexual. Please make yourself consciously aware
that we are discussing homosexuality and by discussion you are
therefore thinking about homosexuality. Anyway by refusing to grant
actions from thoughts you are failing to allow beliefs, principle or
traditions. Is it not the right of the church to be given task of
interpretation of its opinions or thoughts and to base its judgement
and acceptance of those opinions? Homosexual couples should be allowed
to adopt but if an application is declined on the grounds of
homosexuality then this is surely an action based on thought. I am not
saying the thought is correct or the action. However civil equality is
to create equals amongst us all. However, either heterosexual or
homosexual in life there is no equality because we all think
differently and base our actions on opinions. It is not wrong to think
differently. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dr. Wee Hung Lo |
| Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:23 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"linkspider" <linkspider@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:1171768696.383094.10570@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
: Tony Blair is under criticism for considering to grant the Catholic
: Church an exemption regarding adoption for homosexual couples and its
: refusal of acceptance when making an application on the grounds of
: homosexuality. Now I previously wrote an article and in this article I
: was discussing the need for consideration of the opinion and action
: towards homosexuality. Is it wrong to have the thought that
: homosexuality is unacceptable or is it wrong to act on the thought
: that homosexuality is unacceptable. What I am trying to express is
: that thought in the mind about homosexuality being unfavourable,
: undesirable and unnatural is not the same as failing to seek and
: deliver civil equality. It is not the thought that is wrong but our
: actions from our thoughts. Everybody has thoughts about homosexuality,
: even if you are heterosexual. Please make yourself consciously aware
: that we are discussing homosexuality and by discussion you are
: therefore thinking about homosexuality. Anyway by refusing to grant
: actions from thoughts you are failing to allow beliefs, principle or
: traditions. Is it not the right of the church to be given task of
: interpretation of its opinions or thoughts and to base its judgement
: and acceptance of those opinions? Homosexual couples should be allowed
: to adopt but if an application is declined on the grounds of
: homosexuality then this is surely an action based on thought. I am not
: saying the thought is correct or the action. However civil equality is
: to create equals amongst us all. However, either heterosexual or
: homosexual in life there is no equality because we all think
: differently and base our actions on opinions. It is not wrong to think
: differently.
:
I don't believe you have considered the ramifications involved when a
homosexual couple adopts a child. Most reasonable queers recognize that,
selfish, self centered ones do not. Harsh statement I know. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| linkspider |
| Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:56 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Feb 18, 4:23 am, "Dr. Wee Hung Lo" <dr....@hocho.org> wrote:
Quote: "linkspider" <linkspi...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:1171768696.383094.10570@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
: Tony Blair is under criticism for considering to grant the Catholic
: Church an exemption regarding adoption for homosexual couples and its
: refusal of acceptance when making an application on the grounds of
: homosexuality. Now I previously wrote an article and in this article I
: was discussing the need for consideration of the opinion and action
: towards homosexuality. Is it wrong to have the thought that
: homosexuality is unacceptable or is it wrong to act on the thought
: that homosexuality is unacceptable. What I am trying to express is
: that thought in the mind about homosexuality being unfavourable,
: undesirable and unnatural is not the same as failing to seek and
: deliver civil equality. It is not the thought that is wrong but our
: actions from our thoughts. Everybody has thoughts about homosexuality,
: even if you are heterosexual. Please make yourself consciously aware
: that we are discussing homosexuality and by discussion you are
: therefore thinking about homosexuality. Anyway by refusing to grant
: actions from thoughts you are failing to allow beliefs, principle or
: traditions. Is it not the right of the church to be given task of
: interpretation of its opinions or thoughts and to base its judgement
: and acceptance of those opinions? Homosexual couples should be allowed
: to adopt but if an application is declined on the grounds of
: homosexuality then this is surely an action based on thought. I am not
: saying the thought is correct or the action. However civil equality is
: to create equals amongst us all. However, either heterosexual or
: homosexual in life there is no equality because we all think
: differently and base our actions on opinions. It is not wrong to think
: differently.
:
I don't believe you have considered the ramifications involved when a
homosexual couple adopts a child. Most reasonable queers recognize that,
selfish, self centered ones do not. Harsh statement I know.
It will be interesting to see how this one works out.... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Oct 08, 2008 1:55 am
|
|