On Feb 10, 2:11 pm,
knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
knews4u2c...@yahoo.com
more questions
Dear Subscriber, (sucker)
Suppose today you learned that the U.S. was not a sovereign nation.
was intended to be omitted. (It only makes sense for the law
to work that way, so we don't have to guess at what the law
requires.) Specifically regarding tax laws, the Supreme Court says
that they should NOT be interpreted in a way that includes "matters
not specifically pointed out†(Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151). (The
Court then said that in case of doubt, tax laws should be
interpreted in favor of the citizen, NOT in favor of the
Section 1.61-1 says that "gross income" means "all
income from whatever source derived, unless excluded by law." By
itself that doesn't tell us much, since it just means "everything
that isn't exempt is taxable," which is a truism.
Sections 1.861-
8(a)(3) and 1.861-8(b)(1) say that the items of income listed in
Section 61 of the tax code (things such as compensation for
services, interest, rents, business income, etc.) make up what are
called "classes of gross income." Then those regulations say that
other words, we're again told that they may be exempt. And the regs
direct us to another section...
we're told they're sometimes exempt, and then we're told that
income is NOT exempt when it comes from certain types of
INTERNATIONAL trade. And this is just what we saw with the older
have all of the evidence--sometimes before they have ANY of the
evidence. That is "prejudice." When looking at the hypothetical car-
importing tax above, you have no prejudice, because you've never
Sincerely,
Larken Rose
Larken - are you out of jail? are you still peddling your internet
tax scams? what about the kiddie porn - still into that? Think of
Tessa!
http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.htmlwww.quatloos.com internet tax scams larken rose "861" 861 tax scams
