"John Jones" <jonescardiff@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1168090082.355569.93150@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com...

card xii wrote:

You have the crappy logic of fly droppings. Where the hell did you learn
to
not-think that way?

It might help if you quit trying to use the subjunctive case and just
enroll
in a philosophy of science class. Or something! Gad!!

card xii

Hey Dude, its Wise-up time - My point was that 'imbalance',
'complexity' and 'disorder' can be applied equally to a bag of crisps
as to the brain. The difference between them, which so far no-one has
noted, is one of SIGNIFICANCE, and significance is not a physical
property.

Applied equally? Only with disregard for definitions and science.

The differences among them is noted in many places, including dictionaries.
Try them.

Significance isn't a physical property? Noneuclidian geometry might not
agree with that, not at all.

You are out of your league here. You rant, with nothing to support what you
say or claim. Go away.

card xii

Of course applied equally. Face the music. Without significance I can
apply the notions of imbalance and disorder and complexity to any
object I like.

On 10 Jan 2007 14:17:19 -0800, "John Jones" <jonescardiff@aol.com
proclaimed to the world:

Of course applied equally. Face the music. Without significance I can
apply the notions of imbalance and disorder and complexity to any
object I like.

If you want to make some point here, try defining all the terms you
use for me. Card xii is right. You make no logical sense. You convey
no information with your words. Imbalance, disorder and complexity are
not notions, they are conditions. The significance of a condition?
That depends on what you talk about.

These words you choose to use are vague. They muddy the waters and
your style reminds me of the huckster who hides the pea under a cup. I
am waiting to read something of substance from you.

On 10 Jan 2007 14:17:19 -0800, "John Jones" <jonescardiff@aol.com
proclaimed to the world:

Of course applied equally. Face the music. Without significance I can
apply the notions of imbalance and disorder and complexity to any
object I like.

If you want to make some point here, try defining all the terms you
use for me. Card xii is right. You make no logical sense. You convey
no information with your words. Imbalance, disorder and complexity are
not notions, they are conditions. The significance of a condition?
That depends on what you talk about.

These words you choose to use are vague. They muddy the waters and
your style reminds me of the huckster who hides the pea under a cup. I
am waiting to read something of substance from you.

Socky the Puppet wrote:

On 10 Jan 2007 14:17:19 -0800, "John Jones" <jonescardiff@aol.com
proclaimed to the world:

Of course applied equally. Face the music. Without significance I can
apply the notions of imbalance and disorder and complexity to any
object I like.

If you want to make some point here, try defining all the terms you
use for me. Card xii is right. You make no logical sense. You convey
no information with your words. Imbalance, disorder and complexity are
not notions, they are conditions. The significance of a condition?
That depends on what you talk about.

These words you choose to use are vague. They muddy the waters and
your style reminds me of the huckster who hides the pea under a cup. I
am waiting to read something of substance from you.

You are right. These words do muddy the waters, in every case,
including medicine. See my new post.