| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Physics - Electromagnetic Forum » Inevitability of the electrodynamics' spin tensor
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Guest |
 Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 6:21 pm |
|
|
|
|
It is shown that an theoretical work by Loudon [Phys. Rev. A68, 013806
(2003)], experimental works by Simpson, Dholakia, Allen, Padgett [Opt.
Lett. 22, 52-54 (1997)] and Parkin, Knoner, Nieminen, Heckenberg,
Rubinsztein-Dunlop [physics/0607216] prove existence of the
electrodynamics' spin tensor. Unfortunately, Joseph Richardson, Peer
Review Manager of Optical Society of America, refuses this subject at
all. He wrote on January 4, 2007: "We will not consider any further
submissions on this subject." I think Dr. Richardson cannot stop
considerations of this subject. He must be interested in the authors'
opinions.
My new paper "Inevitability of the electrodynamics' spin tensor" is
submitted to JOSA B and is published at www.sciprin.org. A short
version is submitted to CLEO/QELS.
Radi Khrapko |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 1:28 am |
|
|
|
|
It is admirably! No one of the authors respond though I demonstrate
their conclusions are wrong.
JOSA B rejected my paper "Inevitability of the electrodynamics' spin
tensor" on behalf of OSA though I criticized, in particular,
conclusions of the paper [Opt. Lett. 22, 52], which was referred to by
Allan Boardman's Reviewer of a previous paper.
I received a decision on January 16:
"As stated earlier, we will not consider this paper for any of our
journals. Please submit it elsewhere.
Sincerely, JOSA B Manuscripts Office".
But now they are afraid to mention a name of the rejecter.
I think they will not publish my submission to CLEO/QELS 2007 "Spin
Must Be Added to the Moment of Poynting Vector"
Well, we will continue our investigation of the scientific community.
Radi Khrapko |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| josefmatz |
| Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:39 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
There is no Spin tensor.
Josef Matz
<khrapko_ri@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1168640487.624183.104650@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote: It is shown that an theoretical work by Loudon [Phys. Rev. A68, 013806
(2003)], experimental works by Simpson, Dholakia, Allen, Padgett [Opt.
Lett. 22, 52-54 (1997)] and Parkin, Knoner, Nieminen, Heckenberg,
Rubinsztein-Dunlop [physics/0607216] prove existence of the
electrodynamics' spin tensor. Unfortunately, Joseph Richardson, Peer
Review Manager of Optical Society of America, refuses this subject at
all. He wrote on January 4, 2007: "We will not consider any further
submissions on this subject." I think Dr. Richardson cannot stop
considerations of this subject. He must be interested in the authors'
opinions.
My new paper "Inevitability of the electrodynamics' spin tensor" is
submitted to JOSA B and is published at www.sciprin.org. A short
version is submitted to CLEO/QELS.
Radi Khrapko
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:24 pm |
|
|
|
|
"""josefmatz ΠΙΣΑΜ(Α):
"""
Quote: There is no Spin tensor.
Josef Matz
You are mistaken, there is no God, but Spin tensor exists
Radi Khrapko |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:35 pm |
|
|
|
|
Optics Letters rejected the paper anonymously without consideration on
January 17. Now I submit the paper to PRA. But I have added two
paragraphs:
"We tried to confirm our conclusion by the work PRL 92, 198104 as well,
but we could not find data in the paper. For example, FIG. 2 of the
paper shows the angular velocity of a trapped particle was 590/sec when
the output polarization of the beam was 0.8, i.e. the change in
circular polarisation was 0.2, but the radius of the particle and the
power of the beam are not given in the paper.
Besides, we are puzzled by the fact that "the rotation may be stopped
by aligning the lambda/4 plate located before the objective so that the
polarization is made linear." It seems that if a birefringent particle
converts a circularly polarized beam to partially linear polarized one
and is rotated, the particle must convert a linearly polarized beam to
partially circularly polarized one and be rotated as well.
Unfortunately, the authors did not measure the degree of output
circular polarization when input polarization was linear."
Radi Khrapko |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 05, 2008 1:24 am
|
|