Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Philosophy - Tech Forum  »  GRAVITY AT SMALL DISTANCES
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Pentcho Valev
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:50 am
Guest
When a falsehood or an absurdity is allowed to stay too long in science
things get irreversible: no Hercules can clean a stable uncleaned for
centuries (Augean stable had not been cleaned for 30 years). So the
absurdity "Entropy always increases" can only be partially abandoned:
no alternative development is possible. 140 years ago Clausius deduced
it from two false premises but now people neither care nor are able to
repair anything.

Lately scientists have been worrying about gravity at small distances:
"Gravity, which is the behavior of space and time, is well-understood
at large distances - when talking about planets, for instance. But when
scientists attempt to apply it at very small distances, the idea that
we can measure space and time breaks down....Although what actually
occurs at small distances remains a mystery, Burgess conjectures that
what will probably be true is that at very small distances, it will not
make sense to talk about space and time at all.":

http://media.wildcat.arizona.edu/media/storage/paper997/news/2007/01/23/News/Local.Gravity.Conference.Shows.Off.Weighty.Ideas-2668607.shtml?sourcedomain=wildcat.arizona.edu&MIIHost=media.collegepublisher.com

In his Opticks Newton wrote: "Do not bodies act upon light at a
distance, and by their action bend its rays; and is not this action
strongest at a least distance?". Since Newton meant bending around the
edge of the diffraction hole his idea obviously went beyond the
standard gravitational theory. This could have been developed if the
false concept of light as a continuous field had not filled the science
stable. Nothing can be done now. The ubiquitous Huygens wavelets will
continue to be the explanation of everything.

Pentcho Valev
Sam Wormley
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:34 am
Guest
Direct Force Sensing at the Piconewton Level
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2006/split/807-1.html

Physics News Update -- Number 807 #1, December 28, 2006
by Phil Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi


The measurement of mass can be carried out at the 10^-21 (zeptogram)
level (see PNU 725) and of force to the 10^-18 newton (attonewton)
level (Arlett et al., in Nano Letters, 2006). But for many
measurements in the cell biology world, this is too much sensitivity.
Forces in this realm are typically at the piconewton (10^-12 newton)
level. Examples include the force applied by the kinesin molecular
motor protein to transport vesicles (6 piconewton), the force needed
to unzip a DNA molecule at room temperature (9^-20 piconewton), or the
force needed to pull a DNA apart by pulling on opposite ends (65
piconewton).

Biophysicists need a cost-effective force sensor that works reliably
in water at the piconewton level. Steven Koch and his colleagues at
Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, N.M., are well along on
delivering the needed sensor. The core of the device is a spring one
millimeter long but only a micron thick and is fabricated using a
standard polysilicon micromachining process. This spring operates
according to the classic experiment conducted by Robert Hooke in the
17th century: the force exerted on the spring equals the amount of
the spring's compression or extension multiplied by a spring
constant, which in this case is about 1 piconewton per nanometer.

The spring, mounted on a substrate, can be used in a number of ways:
it can be entrained to move with the push or pull of a biological
sample or it can be made sensitive to magnetic fields and so function
as a field sensor. The displacement of the spring is currently viewed
by a video camera with precision of 2 nanometer, but faster and more
precise methods are possible.

Koch (now at the University of New Mexico, skoch@chtm.unm.edu) says
that the most likely applications of the new sensor will be in
measuring forces on the kind of magnetic microspheres used in
single-biomolecule experiments and to calibrate the electromagnets
used in deploying microspheres in doing things such as stretch,
twist, or unzip DNA. He also envisions direct mechanical force
measurements, combined with other MEMS (microelectromechanical
systems) implements, in biophysical experiments where optical
tweezers (using laser beams to manipulate the microspheres attached
to molecules) cannot be used.

The Sandia sensor could be adapted to apply an adjustable tension to
single DNA molecules in order to study protein binding or enzymatic
processes.

Koch et al., Applied Physics Letters, 23 October 2006
Contact Steven Koch
hanson
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:55 am
Guest
Great experimental cunning, but what **distances** exactly
are they talking about. All I see is force levels and accuracy of
distances. So how small are the distances they talk about?
Quote:

"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message

news:C7Kth.319213$FQ1.265039@attbi_s71...
Quote:
Direct Force Sensing at the Piconewton Level
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2006/split/807-1.html

Physics News Update -- Number 807 #1, December 28, 2006
by Phil Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi


The measurement of mass can be carried out at the 10^-21 (zeptogram)
level (see PNU 725) and of force to the 10^-18 newton (attonewton)
level (Arlett et al., in Nano Letters, 2006). But for many
measurements in the cell biology world, this is too much sensitivity.
Forces in this realm are typically at the piconewton (10^-12 newton)
level. Examples include the force applied by the kinesin molecular
motor protein to transport vesicles (6 piconewton), the force needed
to unzip a DNA molecule at room temperature (9^-20 piconewton), or the
force needed to pull a DNA apart by pulling on opposite ends (65
piconewton).

Biophysicists need a cost-effective force sensor that works reliably
in water at the piconewton level. Steven Koch and his colleagues at
Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, N.M., are well along on
delivering the needed sensor. The core of the device is a spring one
millimeter long but only a micron thick and is fabricated using a
standard polysilicon micromachining process. This spring operates
according to the classic experiment conducted by Robert Hooke in the
17th century: the force exerted on the spring equals the amount of
the spring's compression or extension multiplied by a spring
constant, which in this case is about 1 piconewton per nanometer.

The spring, mounted on a substrate, can be used in a number of ways:
it can be entrained to move with the push or pull of a biological
sample or it can be made sensitive to magnetic fields and so function
as a field sensor. The displacement of the spring is currently viewed
by a video camera with precision of 2 nanometer, but faster and more
precise methods are possible.

Koch (now at the University of New Mexico, skoch@chtm.unm.edu) says
that the most likely applications of the new sensor will be in
measuring forces on the kind of magnetic microspheres used in
single-biomolecule experiments and to calibrate the electromagnets
used in deploying microspheres in doing things such as stretch,
twist, or unzip DNA. He also envisions direct mechanical force
measurements, combined with other MEMS (microelectromechanical
systems) implements, in biophysical experiments where optical
tweezers (using laser beams to manipulate the microspheres attached
to molecules) cannot be used.

The Sandia sensor could be adapted to apply an adjustable tension to
single DNA molecules in order to study protein binding or enzymatic
processes.

Koch et al., Applied Physics Letters, 23 October 2006
Contact Steven Koch
zzbunker@netscape.net
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:33 am
Guest
On Jan 24, 2:50 am, "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
When a falsehood or an absurdity is allowed to stay too long in science
things get irreversible: no Hercules can clean a stable uncleaned for
centuries (Augean stable had not been cleaned for 30 years). So the
absurdity "Entropy always increases" can only be partially abandoned:
no alternative development is possible. 140 years ago Clausius deduced
it from two false premises but now people neither care nor are able to
repair anything.

Lately scientists have been worrying about gravity at small distances:
"Gravity, which is the behavior of space and time, is well-understood
at large distances - when talking about planets, for instance. But when
scientists attempt to apply it at very small distances, the idea that
we can measure space and time breaks down....Although what actually
occurs at small distances remains a mystery, Burgess conjectures that
what will probably be true is that at very small distances, it will not
make sense to talk about space and time at all.":

http://media.wildcat.arizona.edu/media/storage/paper997/news/2007/01/...

In his Opticks Newton wrote: "Do not bodies act upon light at a
distance, and by their action bend its rays; and is not this action
strongest at a least distance?". Since Newton meant bending around the
edge of the diffraction hole his idea obviously went beyond the
standard gravitational theory. This could have been developed if the
false concept of light as a continuous field had not filled the science
stable. Nothing can be done now. The ubiquitous Huygens wavelets will
continue to be the explanation of everything.

Something was done, Since it is now known
that classical waves have no momentum.
Which means Newton's theory
of light is like Newton's theory of gravity.
All philosophers, jerks, and thumbs and no
Turing Machines.


Quote:

Pentcho Valev
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:48 pm