| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Geology Forum » NOVA's "Magnetic Storm" and CellWell1 & CellWell2
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Archimedes Plutonium |
 Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 2:36 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Tonight on PBS was a Nova program about the magnetic field created
from the Earth's molten iron core producing a magnetic dynamo where
the electric current created from the motion of the molten iron
increases the magnetic field which in turn increases the electric
current.
I was rather surprized to hear that it took 50 years before acceptance
of "reverse polarity". Surprized because let us consider the Earth a
machine. And unless the machine is near perfect with few blemishes
that the reverse polarity would be a commonplace occurrence because of
the Earth's many flaws from that of
perfection. That the sloshing around of molten iron in the Earth's
core should be a crude happening and thus many chaos attractors
involved in the molten iron to form. And since so many chaotic
attractors that reverse polarity commonplace and so why the acceptance
took 50 years. Some 50 years ago if a physicists were to get up in
front of a crowd of geologists at an important convention and related
the above that the iron core would be full of chaos-attractors that
reverse-polarity should be commonplace.
Excellent hour program this was for it left remaining many questions
of profound interest. To name a few:
(1) what is the relationship, mathematically, of the Earth axis of
rotation and where the "magnetic northpole exists"? I suspect the axis
of rotation is a direct relationship to the magnetic north and the
main cause of chaos attractors. Example: I doubt the Earth ever
experienced a long period of time where the axis was nearly 90 degrees
opposite the magneticpole to be what maybe called magneticeast. So has
anyone in physics or geology or math related the existence of the
Earth axis to the whereabouts of magneticpole. Keep in mind the above
stresses "a long period of time"
(2) I wonder if there is biological evidence that when these
reversepolarities took place whether any species extinction coincided?
(3) And apparently reversepolarity probably had little to no affect
upon primate evolution and especially humanlike evolution going back
10 million years. We cannot say that Homo habilis just for an example
was extincted due to magnetic shield loss.
(4) If our present day polarity has lasted for 780,000 years and the
average lasting is only 200,000 years then why or what reason has this
period been so long lived?? I believe I have an answer for that from
my theory of CellWell1
and CellWell2.
(5) Does anyone know if the moons of Jupiter, in particular Europa
which is believed to have oceans of water, does anyone know if Europa
has a molten iron core and whether it has a magnetic field of
considerable size??
(6) The object in our SolarSystem that is the largest internal
magneticfield is Jupiter. So does Jupiter have a huge molten iron
core? And is there some means or method of finding out if Jupiter has
experienced magneticreversal?? Jupiter as well as every other astro
body would be imperfect enough for the molten iron to slosh around
chaotically from time to time and especially given the precession of
axis to further the chaos. So is there some means of tackling whether
Jupiter has had magnetic reversal.
I am glad for this opportunity to review my theory of CellWell1 and
CellWell2. Those of you who have followed me in the 1990s recognize
that in an AtomTotality theory that the Universe has layerings of ages
like tree rings or like onion layers and that is why I coined the name
CellWell1 and CellWell2 for our SolarSystem. Because in an
AtomTotality our present newest layer of the Universe is the Plutonium
AtomTotality which is about 5 billion years old accreted new onto the
older AtomTotality of the Uranium AtomTotality which is about 15 to 20
billion years old and we can go backwards through all the other
AtomTotalities.
That is why Freedman gets an age of 8 billion years old and Sandage
gets an age of 20 billion years old because they are measuring age in
different layers of the Universe.
But not only the age of stars and galaxies are of different
AtomTotalities but our own SolarSystem has different ages. The most
recent newcomers to our SolarSystem are the gas giants and their
moons. They grow from the accretion of "cosmic rays" and Jupiter is
the most vigorous grower because most cosmic rays
end up inside of Jupiter. So the gasgiants comprise the most recent
age in our SolarSystem and I call them CellWell2. The gas giants are
about 5 billion years old coinciding with the "minibigbang" that was
the PlutoniumAtomTotality onto the older UraniumAtomTotality. The Sun
and Mercury, Venus, Earth Mars date back to the older
UraniumAtomTotality and are anywhere from 15 billion years old to 20
billion years old. And they looked very much different than now. Earth
some 15 billion years ago was like Europa to Jupiter is now. Earth was
a satellite to a larger planet which got swallowed up by the Sun and
the Sun was probably not a star until about 10 to 15 billion years
ago.
So, from watching this program and learning that Mars craters of
Argyle and Hellas (excuse the spelling) were 4 billion years old with
no magnetic inheritance suggests support of the CellWell1 and
CellWell2 theory.
What I need to find out is whether Europa or the other moons of
Jupiter have a similar background history as what Mars seems to have.
For it would indicate strongly that both Earth and Mars at one time in
their ancient past, some 15 billion years ago were moons of some gas
giant which we will call Zeus. This Zeus gas giant would eventually be
swallowed by our protoSun but the moons saved or spared from
collision. And before Mars reached its present day orbit, it had
teeming life and oceans. Same goes for Mercury and Venus.
Same goes for probably most of the moons of Jupiter and the other gas
giants in that they also will have teeming life and oceans and then
their gas giant planet become swallowed up to form a star. Many of the
moons will also be swallowed up.
And our SolarSystem will then have twin stars and not a solo Sun.
Many of the exoplanets discovered in the late 1990s show evidence of
huge planets circling close to their solo star. That is the common
evolution of most every star in the Universe in that they start out
solo and with time in each new AtomTotality layer gas giants are
created and then swallowed together to form a twin star SolarSystem.
Summary: the most important hunt from this TV program is to see
whether Europa and the other moons of Jupiter have any sort of
resemblance to Mars. Does Europa have a liquid iron core and if not
how much more mass to give it a liquid ironcore. And what extent of a
magnetic field??
Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:15 am
|
|
