Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Medicine - Lyme Forum  »  Virtual Factious Disorder
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
LunaTick
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:26 pm
Guest
The following news report about a woman who pretended to have
cancer-and probably imagined she had Lyme disease-reminded me of a
relatively new phenomenon called virtual factitious disorder.


WZZM13 ONLINE - ABC TELEVISON for ALL OF WEST MICHIGAN
Emotional sentencing for woman who faked cancer diagnosis
Created: 11/28/2006

A woman who lied when she claimed she has cancer says she hopes people
who donated money to her cause will forgive her.

Tuesday afternoon, 24-year old Kyleen Hipp was sentenced to 5 months in
jail and 3-years probation for obtaining thousands of dollars under
false pretenses.

She claimed she had terminal cancer. The judge says donations at a
casino club fundraiser and other events may have raised as much as
$35,000.

He says Hipp spent most of the money on what he calls "riotous living."

In court Hipp apologized, "I'm deeply sorry for the deception and pain
and hurt I know I have caused people. I know I am responsible for my
actions and I am fully prepared to accept the consequences. I just hope
the people I care about and people I've hurt can find it in their
hearts to forgive me."

The judge says- Hipp did spend $900.00 of the donated money to treat
her Lyme Disease.

He also said Hipp may serve her sentence under house arrest while
wearing an electronic tether.

The judge suggests Hipp make restitution by donating the amount of
money she collected to the American Cancer Society.


Denise Grady (NYT) wrote an excellent piece about this twisted online
behavior (April 23, 1998). Here's an excerpt:

A MONK who had taken a vow of poverty could not seek treatment for a
rapidly advancing type of cancer and faced death with fear and
loneliness. A 23-year-old woman, hospitalized for an eating disorder,
suffered a stroke. A teen-age girl mourning the death of one premature
baby gave birth to another, tinier and more fragile than the first.

Three lost souls with heart-rending stories, they clicked their way to
Internet support groups, where they elicited outpourings of sympathy
from fellow sufferers.

All three were incorrigible fakers. They lied their way into networks
of people with real troubles who had come to care about one another and
to think of themselves as communities. For months the frauds strung
along their on-line audiences, which included many people who were
living through genuine crises and tragedies but who had nonetheless
extended themselves to comfort others.

Read the complete story here.

Rebecca Wurtz, writing in Clinical Infectious Diseases (1998
Apr;26(4):924-32), presented more than a dozen fascinating cases of
psychiatric diseases initially presenting as infectious diseases.
Here's the abstract from her paper:

Although many psychiatric diseases have somatic manifestations, some
focus on fears or delusions of infection. When a patient with a
psychiatric basis for an apparent infection presents to an infectious
disease physician, the physician may find the problem confusing,
amusing, and ultimately frustrating until the psychiatric basis for
disease is recognized. Some of these psychiatric disorders can be
treated and controlled with medication and psychotherapy, although
patients may resist psychiatric referral. This article reviews examples
of psychiatric disorders in patients who present to the infectious
disease physician, including factitious infection, malingering,
obsessive compulsive disorder, phobias, veneroneuroses, somatization
disorders, and delusional infection. The role that physicians play in
amplifying these disorders is reviewed. Strategies for referral to
psychiatric services are also discussed. Patients with a psychiatric
disease are seen in infectious disease practices more commonly than
physicians realize.

It's a wacky world on the World Wide Web.

http://ld-50.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2006-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2007-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=50
Mockingbird
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:14 am
Guest
this is a really shitty thing to post chuck. you can look up
neurosyphilis and see that it sometimes presents as a 'hypochondriacal"
or somataform disorder in first years. Were you one of the overseers of
the Tuskeegee project? Trying to escape your past?

you shouldn't promote the idea that an infection can't result in
psychiatric illness or can't present as an apparent somatiform
disorder...both happen...we've been over all of this before, I don't
know why you keep posting stuff like this. Do you know what it's like
to have such a presentation and be treated like your problems are not
due to a physical illness? I do. It's not fun.

while we're on the subject, it should be pointed out that historically
{meaning, before lyme-corrupted science} somatiform disorders were
primarily found in females of low IQ. Look it up. Hypochondriasis or
somatic disorders due to affective disorders or among males and/in
higher IQ brackets are very, very rare.

Then came lyme.

Stop seeing what you want to see.


LunaTick wrote:
Quote:
The following news report about a woman who pretended to have
cancer-and probably imagined she had Lyme disease-reminded me of a
relatively new phenomenon called virtual factitious disorder.


WZZM13 ONLINE - ABC TELEVISON for ALL OF WEST MICHIGAN
Emotional sentencing for woman who faked cancer diagnosis
Created: 11/28/2006

A woman who lied when she claimed she has cancer says she hopes people
who donated money to her cause will forgive her.

Tuesday afternoon, 24-year old Kyleen Hipp was sentenced to 5 months in
jail and 3-years probation for obtaining thousands of dollars under
false pretenses.

She claimed she had terminal cancer. The judge says donations at a
casino club fundraiser and other events may have raised as much as
$35,000.

He says Hipp spent most of the money on what he calls "riotous living."

In court Hipp apologized, "I'm deeply sorry for the deception and pain
and hurt I know I have caused people. I know I am responsible for my
actions and I am fully prepared to accept the consequences. I just hope
the people I care about and people I've hurt can find it in their
hearts to forgive me."

The judge says- Hipp did spend $900.00 of the donated money to treat
her Lyme Disease.

He also said Hipp may serve her sentence under house arrest while
wearing an electronic tether.

The judge suggests Hipp make restitution by donating the amount of
money she collected to the American Cancer Society.


Denise Grady (NYT) wrote an excellent piece about this twisted online
behavior (April 23, 1998). Here's an excerpt:

A MONK who had taken a vow of poverty could not seek treatment for a
rapidly advancing type of cancer and faced death with fear and
loneliness. A 23-year-old woman, hospitalized for an eating disorder,
suffered a stroke. A teen-age girl mourning the death of one premature
baby gave birth to another, tinier and more fragile than the first.

Three lost souls with heart-rending stories, they clicked their way to
Internet support groups, where they elicited outpourings of sympathy
from fellow sufferers.

All three were incorrigible fakers. They lied their way into networks
of people with real troubles who had come to care about one another and
to think of themselves as communities. For months the frauds strung
along their on-line audiences, which included many people who were
living through genuine crises and tragedies but who had nonetheless
extended themselves to comfort others.

Read the complete story here.

Rebecca Wurtz, writing in Clinical Infectious Diseases (1998
Apr;26(4):924-32), presented more than a dozen fascinating cases of
psychiatric diseases initially presenting as infectious diseases.
Here's the abstract from her paper:

Although many psychiatric diseases have somatic manifestations, some
focus on fears or delusions of infection. When a patient with a
psychiatric basis for an apparent infection presents to an infectious
disease physician, the physician may find the problem confusing,
amusing, and ultimately frustrating until the psychiatric basis for
disease is recognized. Some of these psychiatric disorders can be
treated and controlled with medication and psychotherapy, although
patients may resist psychiatric referral. This article reviews examples
of psychiatric disorders in patients who present to the infectious
disease physician, including factitious infection, malingering,
obsessive compulsive disorder, phobias, veneroneuroses, somatization
disorders, and delusional infection. The role that physicians play in
amplifying these disorders is reviewed. Strategies for referral to
psychiatric services are also discussed. Patients with a psychiatric
disease are seen in infectious disease practices more commonly than
physicians realize.

It's a wacky world on the World Wide Web.

http://ld-50.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2006-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&updated-max=2007-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=50
the 3rd Man
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:53 pm
Guest
Mockingbird wrote:

Quote:
this is a really shitty thing to post chuck. you can look up
neurosyphilis and see that it sometimes presents as a 'hypochondriacal"
or somataform disorder in first years. Were you one of the overseers of
the Tuskeegee project? Trying to escape your past?


Please don't flatter Chuck's ego with this kind of stupid talk.

The guy apparently gets off on thinking he is fooling some halfwits
into thinking he is "McSweegan".

He has to basically cut and paste the real McSweegan's work, because
his own deficiencies in grammatical rules will give him away. He's just
a witless idiot with about as much importance as the after effects of
last night's taco dinner...

(What is amazing is that he thinks they don't know who "Griff" is over
at Lymenet)...



So far as the real McSweegan goes...well, IF this is his stuff...(and
that looks like a good possiibility)...

....damn, he needs to move on...get a LIFE. Can you say, "Obsession"?

IT'S OVER.

You know, I once had to deal with a group of "grassroots" types that
behaved very much like the LymeNutters...only worse.

They throw bombs at everything...and when you bust your ass and finally
manage to do good 'for the people"...they try to take all the
credit...they say that they 'forced you to do it'.

Gawd, they're fucking awful. And they have books and stuff that teaches
them how to do this stupid shit they do.

BUT...you do NOT "let them get to you". You do NOT alter your course in
response to them...or even respond to them unless the dictates of the
situation demand it.

Fucking amateur. Embarrassing, really. Emotional little thing.

So, McSweegan has, in my opinion, every right to be upset...and he has
every right to speak his mind and exercise his First Amendment Rights.

But it's not smart...and from reading these comments (assuming that
they are, indeed, his) it is readily apparent that he is way, way
overboard in terms of his lack of personal emotional detachment.

If I were his boss, no way in hell would I ever let him near anything
to do with Lyme disease, ever again, for the simple reason that he is
clearly incapable of objectivity at this point. Sure, he can express
his opinion outside of work, but his biases inside the workplace that
affect his work...that's another matter.

And...apparently, he has never focused on the essential problem of the
vaccine...IT NEVER MADE ECONOMIC sense.

WHY take a vaccine to prevent a disease that is "hard to catch and
easily curable"? Hmmm?

The only thing that would makea vaccine viable was the very "Lyme
anxiety" that some of these Doctors seemed obsessed with preventing.

Why expend any effort trying to come up with an effective vaccine for a
disease that, according to Ed, has so few longterm consequences and can
be easily cured with a simple course of doxycycline?

And so far as his literary skills go...from what little I
read...yeesh...as an author, he makes a good coffee-boy.

Ed Starbucks.
LunaTick
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:23 pm
Guest
The article is off your LD-50 blog, just showing your handy work Ed.
Are you upset that your blog leaked out all over the net this week?
Could explain the nasty e-mail you sent me this week.


I have always said I am not you, in fact genius it was you who stole my
"obsession" story with the insane Kathleen character pouring ticks in
the children's beds. What is the matter Ed, you can't come up with your
own ideas Mr.PH D?

You really should hide your writing style when you e-mailed me this
week Ed,
you give your sock puppets away.



"So far as the real McSweegan goes...well, IF this is his stuff...(and
that looks like a good possiibility).."

lol, I liked it better when you spend all your time on the blog, good
work by the way on it.


God, being intellectually superior gets boring at times.

CPA
Usenet Supreme Loser Chuc
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:09 pm
Guest
the 3rd Man wrote:
Quote:
Mockingbird wrote:

this is a really shitty thing to post chuck. you can look up
neurosyphilis and see that it sometimes presents as a 'hypochondriacal"
or somataform disorder in first years. Were you one of the overseers of
the Tuskeegee project? Trying to escape your past?


Please don't flatter Chuck's ego with this kind of stupid talk.

The guy apparently gets off on thinking he is fooling some halfwits
into thinking he is "McSweegan".

He has to basically cut and paste the real McSweegan's work, because
his own deficiencies in grammatical rules will give him away. He's just
a witless idiot with about as much importance as the after effects of
last night's taco dinner...

(What is amazing is that he thinks they don't know who "Griff" is over
at Lymenet)...



So far as the real McSweegan goes...well, IF this is his stuff...(and
that looks like a good possiibility)...

...damn, he needs to move on...get a LIFE. Can you say, "Obsession"?

IT'S OVER.

You know, I once had to deal with a group of "grassroots" types that
behaved very much like the LymeNutters...only worse.

They throw bombs at everything...and when you bust your ass and finally
manage to do good 'for the people"...they try to take all the
credit...they say that they 'forced you to do it'.

Gawd, they're fucking awful. And they have books and stuff that teaches
them how to do this stupid shit they do.

BUT...you do NOT "let them get to you". You do NOT alter your course in
response to them...or even respond to them unless the dictates of the
situation demand it.

Fucking amateur. Embarrassing, really. Emotional little thing.

So, McSweegan has, in my opinion, every right to be upset...and he has
every right to speak his mind and exercise his First Amendment Rights.

But it's not smart...and from reading these comments (assuming that
they are, indeed, his) it is readily apparent that he is way, way
overboard in terms of his lack of personal emotional detachment.

If I were his boss, no way in hell would I ever let him near anything
to do with Lyme disease, ever again, for the simple reason that he is
clearly incapable of objectivity at this point. Sure, he can express
his opinion outside of work, but his biases inside the workplace that
affect his work...that's another matter.

And...apparently, he has never focused on the essential problem of the
vaccine...IT NEVER MADE ECONOMIC sense.

WHY take a vaccine to prevent a disease that is "hard to catch and
easily curable"? Hmmm?

The only thing that would makea vaccine viable was the very "Lyme
anxiety" that some of these Doctors seemed obsessed with preventing.

Why expend any effort trying to come up with an effective vaccine for a
disease that, according to Ed, has so few longterm consequences and can
be easily cured with a simple course of doxycycline?

And so far as his literary skills go...from what little I
read...yeesh...as an author, he makes a good coffee-boy.

Ed Starbucks.

LOL.

All good stuff.
Ya pegged all of them.
the 3rd Man
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:48 am
Guest
Usenet Supreme Loser ChuckWorth wrote:
Quote:
Ed Starbucks.

LOL.

All good stuff.
Ya pegged all of them.

Uhhh...okay...I suspect that you don't realize who you just agreed with
there...(and some others should probably figure out exactly how much
attention you really pay to what they say...and how much your stroking
is really worth)...

....but I would appreciate it if you wouldn't agree with me in the
future, okay?

Creeps me out.
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:24 pm