| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Astro - Amateur Forum » Call for Peer Review: Exormetism
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Guest |
 Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:27 pm |
|
|
|
|
Call for Peer Review: Exormetism
Dear newsgroup readers,
The following paper has been submitted to the Open Access Scientific
Internet Journal: Scientia Araneae Totius Orbis (S.A.T.O.). I am in a
kind of dilemma because the S.A.T.O. editors have no experience with
Cosmology and I as Chief-Editor can only understand the general
reasoning and structure of the white paper. This I can peer review,
not the physics!
------------ABSTRACT------------
TITLE: Exormetism: A Steady-State Theory
SUB TITLE: Unlike antigravity, that just balances gravity, for the
universe to be Euclidean, the inferable dark force is clearly
fundamental, as the law of its action implies.
BY: Panagiotis C. Karagiorgis
The parameters entering into this theory have been estimated from the
redshifts of all galaxy clusters listed in the NASA Extragalactic
Database (NED). September 9, 2003.
A basic principle of the relativity theory states that all laws of
physics remain unaltered, at all possible times and places in the
universe. These precise laws, as we know them, hold neither inside
black holes, nor during the first moments of a primitive big bang,
which can only be thought of, as having occurred "elsewhere", not in
the real universe.
Virtually, the big-bang hypothesis suggests that, a tiny bubble of
space, which first appeared from nowhere, was rapidly concurred by a
sudden, ultra-condensed, tremendous flow, justifying an expansion so
fast, that we are still wondering, billions of years after that
violent incident, if the inflation of such a bubble will ever stop...
accelerating. Ordinarily, we should be wondering, instead, where the
principal laws came from. Since never changing, these laws were
present within the initial vacuum. Then, how could a tiny ball contain
the energy required for such a big bang? Yet, the so-called theory
will continue to be popular, until a purely scientific explanation of
the universal expansion is seriously attempted. Developed under a
relativistic scope, the mathematical "theory of exormetism", might
just be a first step in this attempt.
The idea, inhere, is that repulsive gravity dominates the
intergalactic space, which is forced thereby to be curved negatively,
while positive gravity prevails in the neighborhood of galaxies,
quasars, black holes, or any objects of considerable mass. Should we
consider the average density of mass in space (great-scale
homogeneity), the outcome would be a gravitational equilibrium,
asserting that the universe is Euclidean (and, therefore, infinite).
The respective proof is solidly based on a most general form of the
cosmological principle, and implements, in fact, the theory of
relativity. It follows that, besides negative gravity, which fills the
intergalactic space, there must be some other universal force,
effectively carrying the galaxies away, and away from each other. The
subsequent expansion, however, could eventually reduce the average
mass density, thus working in favor of a repulsive field, since
deforming hyperbolically the geometry of space. This undesired
evolution is, amazingly, being suspended by the balancing consequences
of another cosmological process:
As we already assumed, negative curvature characterizes extensive
regions of ultra-low mass density. In such regions, creation of new
particles may just occur, as a reaction of space to a certain level of
hyperbolic deformation. Wherever this occurs, the mass density
increases, on the expense of field-energy being released locally. This
eternal process is such to retain steady the gravitational equilibrium
in the universe.
------------END-OF-ABSTRACT-----
FULL PAPER AT URL:
http://home.versatel.nl/galien8/SATOPreprintServer/exormetism.html
My question to the readers is: Please judge and peer review the
article in a way that it can be improved. Report in this newsgroup. If
there comes a revised and S.A.T.O. published paper I will inform you
through this channel.
Kind regards,
Johan van der Galien.
PS: S.A.T.O. is, as I said earlier, Open Access and there is no money
involved what so ever (totally Non-Profit), as a matter of fact
running and managing it is a hobby of mine (as Chief-Editor and
Webmaster.) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Ioannis |
| Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
<galien8@zonnet.nl> wrote in message
news:1170797247.767005.211090@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Call for Peer Review: Exormetism
Dear newsgroup readers,
The following paper has been submitted to the Open Access Scientific
Internet Journal: Scientia Araneae Totius Orbis (S.A.T.O.). I am in a
kind of dilemma because the S.A.T.O. editors have no experience with
Cosmology and I as Chief-Editor can only understand the general
reasoning and structure of the white paper. This I can peer review,
not the physics!
[snip]
I am not qualified to peer-review this paper, so just two observations for
potential judges:
1) The author's webpage (which looks a bit cranky to me) is at:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/2989/
2) Switch to Windows (Greek) encoding in IE, otherwise the math symbols look
like gibberish.
Quote: Kind regards,
Johan van der Galien.
PS: S.A.T.O. is, as I said earlier, Open Access and there is no money
involved what so ever (totally Non-Profit), as a matter of fact
running and managing it is a hobby of mine (as Chief-Editor and
Webmaster.)
--
I.N. Galidakis
http://ioannis.virtualcomposer2000.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 6:18 pm |
|
|
|
|
On Feb 6, 10:46 pm, "Ioannis" <morph...@olympus.mons> wrote:
Quote: gali...@zonnet.nl> wrote in message
news:1170797247.767005.211090@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
I am not qualified to peer-review this paper, so just two observations for
potential judges:
1) The author's webpage (which looks a bit cranky to me) is at:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/2989/
I do not find it cranky at all! The polyhedra blue prints for
buildings are very ambitiuos but sound, they could be erected!
Quote:
2) Switch to Windows (Greek) encoding in IE, otherwise the math symbols look
like gibberish.
Now this is a very useful comment and advice!
Kind regards,
Johan van der Galien.
S.A.T.O. Chief-Editor and Webmaster |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Ioannis |
| Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 6:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
<galien8@zonnet.nl> wrote in message
news:1170886731.022151.117940@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
On Feb 6, 10:46 pm, "Ioannis" <morph...@olympus.mons> wrote:
gali...@zonnet.nl> wrote in message
news:1170797247.767005.211090@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
I am not qualified to peer-review this paper, so just two observations for
potential judges:
1) The author's webpage (which looks a bit cranky to me) is at:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/2989/
I do not find it cranky at all! The polyhedra blue prints for
buildings are very ambitiuos but sound, they could be erected!
They could be, conceivably. But then he writes (quoting from his webpage):
"My ambition is to sell the exclusive rights on the shown three designs, at no
less than US$500,000 each. A comparatively less complex structure, Cosmic
Sensation, seems to be suitable for outdoor decoration purposes, and its
designs are priced at $20,000 (with no exclusivity being conceded in this
special case).
The designs of the remaining three models -Cosmognosia, Cosmic Intellect, and
Cosmic Volition- will be sold for $100,000 , $125,000 , and $150,000 ,
respectively, to manufacturers of personal or decorative objects, such as
jewels, knickknacks, bibelots etc."
there's something very weird about the above paragraph. I mean, if he expects
his "designs" to be sold for US$500,000, he is nuts. He couldn't get this much
if he was selling nuclear devices in the black market.
Quote: 2) Switch to Windows (Greek) encoding in IE, otherwise the math symbols
look
like gibberish.
Now this is a very useful comment and advice!
Kind regards,
Johan van der Galien.
S.A.T.O. Chief-Editor and Webmaster
--
I.N. Galidakis
http://ioannis.virtualcomposer2000.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:01 pm
|
|