| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Anthropology - Paleo Forum » Lactose Tolerance in East Africa Points to Recent Evolution
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Roger Bagula |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/11/science/11evolve.html?ex=1323493200&en=a2ded9bbd0241eaf&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
Lactose Tolerance in East Africa Points to Recent Evolution
By NICHOLAS WADE
Published: December 11, 2006
A surprisingly recent instance of human evolution has been detected
among the peoples of East Africa. It is the ability to digest milk in
adulthood, conferred by genetic changes that occurred as recently as
3,000 years ago, a team of geneticists has found.
Convergent Adaptation of Human Lactase Persistence in Africa and Europe
(Nature Genetics)
The finding is a striking example of a cultural practice — the raising
of dairy cattle — feeding back into the human genome. It also seems to
be one of the first instances of convergent human evolution to be
documented at the genetic level. Convergent evolution refers to two or
more populations acquiring the same trait independently.
Throughout most of human history, the ability to digest lactose, the
principal sugar of milk, has been switched off after weaning because the
lactase enzyme that breaks the sugar apart is no longer needed. But when
cattle were first domesticated 9,000 years ago and people later started
to consume their milk as well as their meat, natural selection would
have favored anyone with a mutation that kept the lactase gene switched on.
Such a mutation is known to have arisen among an early cattle-raising
people, the Funnel Beaker culture, which flourished 5,000 to 6,000 years
ago in north-central Europe. People with a persistently active lactase
gene have no problem digesting milk and are said to be lactose tolerant.
Almost all Dutch people and 99 percent of Swedes are lactose tolerant,
but the mutation becomes progressively less common in Europeans who live
at increasing distances from the ancient Funnel Beaker region.
Geneticists wondered if the lactose tolerance mutation in Europeans,
identified in 2002, had arisen among pastoral peoples elsewhere. But it
seemed to be largely absent from Africa, even though pastoral peoples
there generally have some degree of tolerance.
A research team led by Dr. Sarah Tishkoff of the University of Maryland
has now solved much of the puzzle. After testing for lactose tolerance
and genetic makeup among 43 ethnic groups in East Africa, she and her
colleagues have found three new mutations, all independent of one
another and of the European mutation, that keep the lactase gene
permanently switched on.
The principal mutation, found among Nilo-Saharan-speaking ethnic groups
of Kenya and Tanzania, arose 2,700 to 6,800 years ago, according to
genetic estimates, Dr. Tishkoff’s group reports today in the journal
Nature Genetics. This fits well with archaeological evidence suggesting
that pastoral peoples from the north reached northern Kenya about 4,500
years ago and southern Kenya and Tanzania 3,300 years ago.
Two other mutations were found, among the Beja people of northeastern
Sudan and tribes of the same language family, Afro-Asiatic, in northern
Kenya.
Genetic evidence shows that the mutations conferred an enormous
selective advantage on their owners, enabling them to leave almost 10
times as many descendants as people without such mutations. The
mutations have created “one of the strongest genetic signatures of
natural selection yet reported in humans,” the researchers write.
The survival advantage was so powerful perhaps because those with the
mutations not only gained extra energy from lactose but also, in drought
conditions, would have benefited from the water in milk. People who were
lactose intolerant could have risked losing water from diarrhea, Dr.
Tishkoff said.
Diane Gifford-Gonzalez, an archaeologist at the University of
California, Santa Cruz, said the new findings were “very exciting”
because they “showed the speed with which a genetic mutation can be
favored under conditions of strong natural selection, demonstrating the
possible rate of evolutionary change in humans.”
The genetic data fitted in well, she said, with archaeological and
linguistic evidence about the spread of pastoralism in Africa. The first
clear evidence of cattle in Africa is from a site 8,000 years old in
northwestern Sudan. Cattle there were domesticated independently from
two other domestications, in the Near East and the Indus Valley of India.
Nilo-Saharan speakers in Sudan and their Cushitic-speaking neighbors in
the Red Sea hills probably domesticated cattle at the same time, because
each has an independent vocabulary for cattle items, said Dr.
Christopher Ehret, an expert on African languages and history at the
University of California, Los Angeles. Descendants of each group moved
south and would have met again in Kenya, Dr. Ehret said.
Dr. Tishkoff detected lactose tolerance among Cushitic speakers and
Nilo-Saharan groups in Kenya. Cushitic is a branch of Afro-Asiatic, the
language family that includes Arabic, Hebrew and ancient Egyptian.
Dr. Jonathan Pritchard, a statistical geneticist at the University of
Chicago and a co-author of the new article, said there were many signals
of natural selection in the human genome but it was usually hard to know
what was being selected for. In this case Dr. Tishkoff clearly defined
the driving force, he said.
The mutations Dr. Tishkoff detected are not in the lactase gene itself
but a nearby region of the DNA that controls the activation of the gene.
The finding that different ethnic groups in East Africa have different
mutations is one instance of their varied evolutionary history and their
exposure to many different selective pressures, Dr. Tishkoff said.
“There is a lot of genetic variation between groups in Africa,
reflecting the different environments in which they live, from deserts
to tropics, and their exposure to very different selective forces,” she
said.
People in different regions of the world have evolved independently
since dispersing from the ancestral human population in northeast Africa
50,000 years ago, a process that has led to the emergence of different
races. But much of this differentiation at the level of DNA may have led
to the same physical result.
As Dr. Tishkoff has found in the case of lactose tolerance, evolution
may use the different mutations available to it in each population to
reach the same goal when each is subjected to the same selective
pressure. “I think it’s reasonable to assume this will be a more general
paradigm,” Dr. Pritchard said. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| johnwl4@aol.com |
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:13 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Roger Bagula wrote:
Quote: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/11/science/11evolve.html?ex=1323493200&en=a2ded9bbd0241eaf&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
Lactose Tolerance in East Africa Points to Recent Evolution
By NICHOLAS WADE
Published: December 11, 2006
A (snip) > A research team led by Dr. Sarah Tishkoff of the University of Maryland
has now solved much of the puzzle. After testing for lactose tolerance
and genetic makeup among 43 ethnic groups in East Africa, she and her
colleagues have found three new mutations, all independent of one
another and of the European mutation, that keep the lactase gene
permanently switched on.
The principal mutation, found among Nilo-Saharan-speaking ethnic groups
of Kenya and Tanzania, arose 2,700 to 6,800 years ago, according to
genetic estimates, Dr. Tishkoff's group reports today in the journal
Nature Genetics. This fits well with archaeological evidence suggesting
that pastoral peoples from the north reached northern Kenya about 4,500
years ago and southern Kenya and Tanzania 3,300 years ago.
Two other mutations were found, among the Beja people of northeastern
Sudan and tribes of the same language family, Afro-Asiatic, in northern
Kenya.
Genetic evidence shows that the mutations conferred an enormous
selective advantage on their owners, enabling them to leave almost 10
times as many descendants as people without such mutations. The
mutations have created "one of the strongest genetic signatures of
natural selection yet reported in humans," the researchers write.
The survival advantage was so powerful perhaps because those with the
mutations not only gained extra energy from lactose but also, in drought
conditions, would have benefited from the water in milk. People who were
lactose intolerant could have risked losing water from diarrhea, Dr.
Tishkoff said.
9(snip)> The mutations Dr. Tishkoff detected are not in the lactase
gene itself
Quote: but a nearby region of the DNA that controls the activation of the gene.
The finding that different ethnic groups in East Africa have different
mutations is one instance of their varied evolutionary history and their
exposure to many different selective pressures, Dr. Tishkoff said.
Interesting article _- thanks. I missed it in the NY Times.
Regards
John GW |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:29 pm |
|
|
|
|
Roger Bagula wrote:
Quote: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/11/science/11evolve.html?ex=1323493200&en=a2ded9bbd0241eaf&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
Lactose Tolerance in East Africa Points to Recent Evolution
By NICHOLAS WADE
Published: December 11, 2006
A surprisingly recent instance of human evolution has been detected
among the peoples of East Africa. It is the ability to digest milk in
adulthood, conferred by genetic changes that occurred as recently as
3,000 years ago, a team of geneticists has found.
Convergent Adaptation of Human Lactase Persistence in Africa and Europe
(Nature Genetics)
The finding is a striking example of a cultural practice - the raising
of dairy cattle - feeding back into the human genome. It also seems to
be one of the first instances of convergent human evolution to be
documented at the genetic level. Convergent evolution refers to two or
more populations acquiring the same trait independently.
Throughout most of human history, the ability to digest lactose, the
principal sugar of milk, has been switched off after weaning because the
lactase enzyme that breaks the sugar apart is no longer needed. But when
cattle were first domesticated 9,000 years ago and people later started
to consume their milk as well as their meat, natural selection would
have favored anyone with a mutation that kept the lactase gene switched on.
Such a mutation is known to have arisen among an early cattle-raising
people, the Funnel Beaker culture, which flourished 5,000 to 6,000 years
ago in north-central Europe. People with a persistently active lactase
gene have no problem digesting milk and are said to be lactose tolerant.
Almost all Dutch people and 99 percent of Swedes are lactose tolerant,
but the mutation becomes progressively less common in Europeans who live
at increasing distances from the ancient Funnel Beaker region.
Geneticists wondered if the lactose tolerance mutation in Europeans,
identified in 2002, had arisen among pastoral peoples elsewhere. But it
seemed to be largely absent from Africa, even though pastoral peoples
there generally have some degree of tolerance.
A research team led by Dr. Sarah Tishkoff of the University of Maryland
has now solved much of the puzzle. After testing for lactose tolerance
and genetic makeup among 43 ethnic groups in East Africa, she and her
colleagues have found three new mutations, all independent of one
another and of the European mutation, that keep the lactase gene
permanently switched on.
The principal mutation, found among Nilo-Saharan-speaking ethnic groups
of Kenya and Tanzania, arose 2,700 to 6,800 years ago, according to
genetic estimates, Dr. Tishkoff's group reports today in the journal
Nature Genetics. This fits well with archaeological evidence suggesting
that pastoral peoples from the north reached northern Kenya about 4,500
years ago and southern Kenya and Tanzania 3,300 years ago.
Two other mutations were found, among the Beja people of northeastern
Sudan and tribes of the same language family, Afro-Asiatic, in northern
Kenya.
Genetic evidence shows that the mutations conferred an enormous
selective advantage on their owners, enabling them to leave almost 10
times as many descendants as people without such mutations. The
mutations have created "one of the strongest genetic signatures of
natural selection yet reported in humans," the researchers write.
The survival advantage was so powerful perhaps because those with the
mutations not only gained extra energy from lactose but also, in drought
conditions, would have benefited from the water in milk. People who were
lactose intolerant could have risked losing water from diarrhea, Dr.
Tishkoff said.
Diane Gifford-Gonzalez, an archaeologist at the University of
California, Santa Cruz, said the new findings were "very exciting"
because they "showed the speed with which a genetic mutation can be
favored under conditions of strong natural selection, demonstrating the
possible rate of evolutionary change in humans."
The genetic data fitted in well, she said, with archaeological and
linguistic evidence about the spread of pastoralism in Africa. The first
clear evidence of cattle in Africa is from a site 8,000 years old in
northwestern Sudan. Cattle there were domesticated independently from
two other domestications, in the Near East and the Indus Valley of India.
Nilo-Saharan speakers in Sudan and their Cushitic-speaking neighbors in
the Red Sea hills probably domesticated cattle at the same time, because
each has an independent vocabulary for cattle items, said Dr.
Christopher Ehret, an expert on African languages and history at the
University of California, Los Angeles. Descendants of each group moved
south and would have met again in Kenya, Dr. Ehret said.
Dr. Tishkoff detected lactose tolerance among Cushitic speakers and
Nilo-Saharan groups in Kenya. Cushitic is a branch of Afro-Asiatic, the
language family that includes Arabic, Hebrew and ancient Egyptian.
Dr. Jonathan Pritchard, a statistical geneticist at the University of
Chicago and a co-author of the new article, said there were many signals
of natural selection in the human genome but it was usually hard to know
what was being selected for. In this case Dr. Tishkoff clearly defined
the driving force, he said.
The mutations Dr. Tishkoff detected are not in the lactase gene itself
but a nearby region of the DNA that controls the activation of the gene.
The finding that different ethnic groups in East Africa have different
mutations is one instance of their varied evolutionary history and their
exposure to many different selective pressures, Dr. Tishkoff said.
"There is a lot of genetic variation between groups in Africa,
reflecting the different environments in which they live, from deserts
to tropics, and their exposure to very different selective forces," she
said.
People in different regions of the world have evolved independently
since dispersing from the ancestral human population in northeast Africa
50,000 years ago, a process that has led to the emergence of different
races. But much of this differentiation at the level of DNA may have led
to the same physical result.
As Dr. Tishkoff has found in the case of lactose tolerance, evolution
may use the different mutations available to it in each population to
reach the same goal when each is subjected to the same selective
pressure. "I think it's reasonable to assume this will be a more general
paradigm," Dr. Pritchard said.
Interesting. I had assumed, after reading Merritt Ruhlen's
postings, that east Africans had inherited the lactose genes from their
Afro-Asiatic ancestors further north rather than developing them
independently.
http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/languagefamilies.html
- A. McIntire |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Jan 09, 2009 5:54 am
|
|