| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Electronics - Misc Forum » multiplexer question
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| panfilero |
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hello, I was wondering if there is such a thing as a 16 to 1
multiplexer. I need something that can connect 16 individual inputs to
1 output 1 at a time in sequence. But I'm having trouble finding a
16:1 MUX. Also, I ordered some chips from mouser, and some are big
enough to stick in my bredboard but a lot of them were real tiny...
does anyone know what's up with the real tiny ones? I couldn't find in
the name of the chip something that would let me know that it was going
to be too tiny to fit in a regular solderless breadboard.
thanks |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Charles Schuler |
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 6:19 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"panfilero" <panfilero@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1167846271.301019.313040@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Quote: Hello, I was wondering if there is such a thing as a 16 to 1
multiplexer. I need something that can connect 16 individual inputs to
1 output 1 at a time in sequence. But I'm having trouble finding a
16:1 MUX. Also, I ordered some chips from mouser, and some are big
enough to stick in my bredboard but a lot of them were real tiny...
does anyone know what's up with the real tiny ones? I couldn't find in
the name of the chip something that would let me know that it was going
to be too tiny to fit in a regular solderless breadboard.
http://camars.kaist.ac.kr/~maeng/cs211/digital06/ch6.pdf |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Thomas Veik |
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:04 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 3 Jan 2007 09:44:31 -0800, "panfilero" <panfilero@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: Hello, I was wondering if there is such a thing as a 16 to 1
multiplexer. I need something that can connect 16 individual inputs to
1 output 1 at a time in sequence. But I'm having trouble finding a
16:1 MUX. Also, I ordered some chips from mouser, and some are big
enough to stick in my bredboard but a lot of them were real tiny...
does anyone know what's up with the real tiny ones? I couldn't find in
the name of the chip something that would let me know that it was going
to be too tiny to fit in a regular solderless breadboard.
thanks
Analog or digital? Motorola has a 16 channel analog mux, MC14067B.
Looks like Mouser has some.
Tom Veik |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:27 am |
|
|
|
|
If you cant find a 16:1 in a direct package, you can use smaller muxes
to build it. I know you can use some 2:1 or 4:1 muxes to build a 16:1.
Its an option if you can't find a dedicated 16:1.
eP
On Jan 3, 11:04 pm, Thomas Veik <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Quote: On 3 Jan 2007 09:44:31 -0800, "panfilero" <panfil...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, I was wondering if there is such a thing as a 16 to 1
multiplexer. I need something that can connect 16 individual inputs to
1 output 1 at a time in sequence. But I'm having trouble finding a
16:1 MUX. Also, I ordered some chips from mouser, and some are big
enough to stick in my bredboard but a lot of them were real tiny...
does anyone know what's up with the real tiny ones? I couldn't find in
the name of the chip something that would let me know that it was going
to be too tiny to fit in a regular solderless breadboard.
thanksAnalog or digital? Motorola has a 16 channel analog mux, MC14067B.
Looks like Mouser has some.
Tom Veik |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Terran Melconian |
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote: does anyone know what's up with the real tiny ones? I couldn't find in
the name of the chip something that would let me know that it was going
to be too tiny to fit in a regular solderless breadboard.
You want to look for a DIP package. Anything with "SO" in the
description of the package is out.
"What's up" is that the smaller ones, called "surface mount", are
desirable because of size, take up only one side of the board, don't
require holes to be drilled, and are easier to place by machine. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:34 am
|
|