| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Education Forum » GUT-CHARGE AND PHOTON IN AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| GRAVITYMECHANIC2 |
 Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2003 5:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
CHARGE AND THE PHOTON IN AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE
Copyright 1984-2003 Allen C. Goodrich
As the universe expands the sum of kinetic and
potential energies remains a constant. The expansion
of the universe results in a decrease of potential
energy and an equal increase of kinetic energy.
A mass (m) or charge (e) in an equilibrium orbit,
increases in kinetic energy at the same rate that
it decreases in potential energy relative to the
rest of the universe. This is not apparent relative
to other masses that are in the same time frame
(such as the sun or other planets). It is only
apparent relative to distant galaxies in the form
of a red shift. The equilibrium orbital radius is the
only orbit where the total energy remains constant
as the universe expands. Any change of orbit requires
the addition or removal of energy, and the formation
of a photon. The planetary and moon orbits are
fixed by the fact that it is very difficult ot provide
enough energy to cause a change of orbit.
The atomic electron orbit can be more easily
changed by the formation of a photon (a change of
potential energy of the electron relative to the rest
of the universe and a change of the potential energy
of the rest of the universe relative to the electron).
Planets, moons, and electrons are normally in equilibrium
orbits where the total energy is constant.
m(2 pi L)^2/t^2 + G(M-m)m/L +e^2/4 pi E_o L = a constant.
kinetic plus potential energy equals a constant.
L is orbital distance ; m is mass in question; M is total
energy of the effective universe; t is time ; G is
gravitational constant; E_o is permitivity or equilibrium
constant ; e is the charge of the electron or proton.
Rotational energy is included in the values of m and M.
In an equilibrium orbit any change of kinetic energy equals
a negative change of potential energy.
Delta (a change of ) m(2 pi L)^2/t^2 = Delta G(M-m)m/L+
Delta e^2/4 pi E_o L. The change of potential energy of the
charge is usually so much larger than the change of the
potential energy of neutral mass that the latter can be
neglected when charges are involved.
For the non equilibrium orbital motion (when a photon is
formed ), the change of kinetic energy does not equal the
change of potential energy. and a non stable motion results.
It tries to return to equilibrium orbital motion by the
gain or loss of a photon h/t.
See:
THE UNIVERSE-A GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF MASS ENERGY
SPACE TIME FRAME MECHANICS- APPEARING IN NEWSLETTER
"SPECTRUM" OF THE BUFFALO ASTRONOMICAL ASSOCIATION
INC. Nov.1996 to Feb.1997
SEE:
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechanic2/myhomepage/business.html
FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION OF THE UNIVERSE
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechanic2/myhomepage/profile.html
TIDES AND GRAVITY MECHANICS
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechanic2/myhomepage/resume.html
A New Grand Unified Theory of the photon and gravitation
is presented, which predicted, stimulated the above research,
and is consistent with the new findings. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Barb Knox |
| Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2003 1:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <20030829193111.18106.00000100@mb-m25.news.cs.com>,
gravitymechanic2@cs.com (GRAVITYMECHANIC2) wrote:
Quote: CHARGE AND THE PHOTON IN AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE
Copyright 1984-2003 Allen C. Goodrich
As the universe expands the sum of kinetic and
potential energies remains a constant. The expansion
of the universe results in a decrease of potential
energy
Hello again. Want to tell us how moving the masses further apart is
supposed to cause a *decrease* in gravitational potential energy, instead
if the obvious increase?
[snip]
--
---------------------------
| BBB b \ barbara minus knox at iname stop com
| B B aa rrr b |
| BBB a a r bbb |
| B B a a r b b |
| BBB aa a r bbb |
----------------------------- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Darrell |
| Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2003 9:22 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Barb Knox" <see@sig.below> wrote in message
news:see-3008031911110001@192.168.1.2...
Quote: In article <20030829193111.18106.00000100@mb-m25.news.cs.com>,
gravitymechanic2@cs.com (GRAVITYMECHANIC2) wrote:
CHARGE AND THE PHOTON IN AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE
Copyright 1984-2003 Allen C. Goodrich
As the universe expands the sum of kinetic and
potential energies remains a constant. The expansion
of the universe results in a decrease of potential
energy
Hello again. Want to tell us how moving the masses further apart is
supposed to cause a *decrease* in gravitational potential energy, instead
if the obvious increase?
Barb, you have been told already. You must have me killfiled or something,
or just failing to acknowlege my remarks.
You seem to believe that the only force at work here is gravity. Not so.
Yeah, as masses move farther apart on cosmic scales there is a decrease in
gravitational kinetic energy and an increase in gravitation potential
energy, but what makes you think he is talking about *just* gravitational
energies? The expnasion rate is increasing (that's established fact, more
or less), so some other energy must be increasing kinetically and
*decreasing* potentially.
Why do you keep insisting on maintaining an outdated cosmological theory?
Modern theory suggests there is another force at work here in addition to
gravity, dubbed "dark energy." You can think of dark energy as a repellant
force, as opposed to gravity which is attractive. This dark energy
attributes to the increasing expansion rate of the universe on cosmic
scales. There is still much to be learned about this mysterious force, but
it is pretty well established now that it *does* exist, whatever you want to
call it. Again, modern theory suggests that a large majority of *all*
energy in the universe is in the form of this mysterious dark energy.
What exactly this dark energy is, is still very much unknown. One theory
suggests that Einstein was wrong and this really *is* the cosmological
constant at work (or rather he thought he was wrong, but was mistaken, as
you recall he took the cc out if his equations due to Hubble's discovery of
the expansion.) Other theories are also being explored.
Again, the expanasion rate *was* once decreasing, as you seem to think it
still is, due to gravity. However, it is well established for several years
now that the expansion rate is now *increasing*. You really do need to
check up on this stuff at least every few years. You are behind the times.
It's not as static a science as you seem to believe. We're learning more
now than we ever have. Check the headlines from time to time, and I don't
mean just the scientific headlines. This stuff was all over the mainstream
news headlines as well.
--
Darrell |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:44 am
|
|