| |
 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Economy Forum » Question on death control |
|
Page 3 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| imbibe@mindspring.com (Da |
 Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 2:53 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Les Cargill wrote:
[quote:2db02d4258]
David James Polewka wrote:
Les Cargill <lNOcargill@cfl.Arr.com> wrote:
imbibe@mindspring.com (David Polewka) wrote:
Do you agree we should allow the world population to
increase to 9 or 10 billion? Do you think that's fair
to future generations?
As opposed to what, machine-gunning the "excess"? Malthus
was wrong.
No,...stopping the suppression of influenza (for starters).
Same thing. You first.
[/quote:2db02d4258]
It's not about me! It's about ALL of us!
And there's no denying it!!@!
..
..
-- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| // u l i e n |
| Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 7:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
<imbibe@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:1132729445.081757.122020@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
[quote:1e5fd1054b]
Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
imbibe@mindspring.com (David Polewka) wrote:
If the people decide to institute death control by stopping
the suppression of influenza, who would be charged with murder?
Meanwhile, real solutions to overpopulation, such as the
widespread dissemination of cheap-to-free birth control
If birth control were enough, the problem would be solved!
Instead, we're heading toward 9 or 10 billion!
[/quote:1e5fd1054b]
If there is enough food to sustain 9 or 10 billion, why should we complain?
Perhaps real estate is the real problem, and to solve that we need to build
subterranean caves. The more the merrier, right?!
[quote:1e5fd1054b]technology under government sponsorship, you continue to
reject from your ignorance, fear, and loathing of anything
spelled "government".
The people don't start wars! Governments do!
[/quote:1e5fd1054b]
I think it's actually people in charge of governments who start the wars. It
is, to be sure the snout of the animal which does the pro-acting.
-- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| imbibe@mindspring.com (Da |
| Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
// u l i e n wrote:
[quote:c935b7acec]imbibe@mindspring.com> wrote in message
If birth control were enough, the problem would be solved!
Instead, we're heading toward 9 or 10 billion!
If there is enough food to sustain 9 or 10 billion, why should we complain?
Perhaps real estate is the real problem, and to solve that we need to build
subterranean caves. The more the merrier, right?!
[/quote:c935b7acec]
Food and real estate are the only requirements?
..
..
-- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| imbibe@mindspring.com (Da |
| Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 3:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
// u l i e n wrote:
[quote:903ab00b87]imbibe@mindspring.com> wrote in message
If birth control were enough, the problem would be solved!
Instead, we're heading toward 9 or 10 billion!
If there is enough food to sustain 9 or 10 billion, why should we complain?
Perhaps real estate is the real problem, and to solve that we need to build
subterranean caves. The more the merrier, right?!
[/quote:903ab00b87]
Food and real estate are the only requirements?
..
..
-- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| // u l i e n |
| Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:01 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
<imbibe@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:1132774906.257102.291360@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[quote:a6b630df93]
// u l i e n wrote:
imbibe@mindspring.com> wrote in message
If birth control were enough, the problem would be solved!
Instead, we're heading toward 9 or 10 billion!
If there is enough food to sustain 9 or 10 billion, why should we
complain?
Perhaps real estate is the real problem, and to solve that we need to
build
subterranean caves. The more the merrier, right?!
Food and real estate are the only requirements?
.
[/quote:a6b630df93]
That and a good news feed.
-- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Kent Paul Dolan |
| Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
David James Polewka, imbibe@mindspring.com wrote:
[quote:fb31504df8]If birth control were enough, the problem would be
solved!
[/quote:fb31504df8]
Sure it would, if it weren't for morons like you
fighting freely available contraception every inch
of the way out of fear of that demon "government"
that has you shivering in terror under your covers.
[quote:fb31504df8]Instead, we're heading toward 9 or 10 billion!
[/quote:fb31504df8]
You've been blowing this bilge out your blue-butted
baboon ass for at least half a decade, and a litany
of correspondents have pointed you to huge cascades
of online information showing that you are wrong,
wrong, wrong. You still persist in the repetition of
this idiocy, though, learning exactly nothing from
the facts freely provided to you, fully qualifying
you for the cherished talk.bizarre "invincibly
ignorant" label and that label's correlated group
shunning.
[quote:fb31504df8]The people don't start wars! Governments do!
[/quote:fb31504df8]
So, what is the label for the kind of mental illness
that can conceptualize governments as somehow acting
without the absolutely necessary mediation of
"people"?
That you are an idiot, and a paranoid one, is well
known to anyone reading your output for long, but I
think you are venturing into whole new realms of
cluelessness when you conceed to givernments some
supernatural ability to act exclusive of the actions
of the people constituting them. That is rank
superstition, doubtless derived from your long and
intimate acquaintance with the contents of bottles
containing alcohol in imbibe-able form.
That both the above statements have been posted by
you dozens of times without alteration suggests as
well that you have the domination by ritual behavior
so characteristic of autism. That mental illness's
well known side effect of making the sufferer unable
to "put himself in the mind of another", and so in
your case understand how horrifying to others your
suggestions of deliberately fomenting plagues onto
humankind are, makes that diagnosis quite credible.
I've no idea, though, whether it can come into
existence as a result of such prolonged alcoholism
as you suffered in your past, or whether you have to
have suffered it from childhood to today.
Give it a rest, David, there is no more damage your
continuing to post to Usenet can possibly do to your
reputation. Your attempts to drag your reputation to
some previously unachieved-by-any-human-being
nadir have succeeded beyond your wildest hopes.
Go rest in glory on your dragon-horde of empty
whiskey bottles and sleep the sleep of the
just profoundly brain-dead.
You richly deserve that reward.
xanthian. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| // u l i e n |
| Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:45 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Goodness! I guess if you don't have anything to say, call them an insulting
name!
"Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> wrote in message
news:1132797825.842264.225860@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
[quote:2767e09455]David James Polewka, imbibe@mindspring.com wrote:
If birth control were enough, the problem would be
solved!
Sure it would, if it weren't for morons like you
fighting freely available contraception every inch
of the way out of fear of that demon "government"
that has you shivering in terror under your covers.
Instead, we're heading toward 9 or 10 billion!
You've been blowing this bilge out your blue-butted
baboon ass for at least half a decade, and a litany
of correspondents have pointed you to huge cascades
of online information showing that you are wrong,
wrong, wrong. You still persist in the repetition of
this idiocy, though, learning exactly nothing from
the facts freely provided to you, fully qualifying
you for the cherished talk.bizarre "invincibly
ignorant" label and that label's correlated group
shunning.
The people don't start wars! Governments do!
So, what is the label for the kind of mental illness
that can conceptualize governments as somehow acting
without the absolutely necessary mediation of
"people"?
That you are an idiot, and a paranoid one, is well
known to anyone reading your output for long, but I
think you are venturing into whole new realms of
cluelessness when you conceed to givernments some
supernatural ability to act exclusive of the actions
of the people constituting them. That is rank
superstition, doubtless derived from your long and
intimate acquaintance with the contents of bottles
containing alcohol in imbibe-able form.
That both the above statements have been posted by
you dozens of times without alteration suggests as
well that you have the domination by ritual behavior
so characteristic of autism. That mental illness's
well known side effect of making the sufferer unable
to "put himself in the mind of another", and so in
your case understand how horrifying to others your
suggestions of deliberately fomenting plagues onto
humankind are, makes that diagnosis quite credible.
I've no idea, though, whether it can come into
existence as a result of such prolonged alcoholism
as you suffered in your past, or whether you have to
have suffered it from childhood to today.
Give it a rest, David, there is no more damage your
continuing to post to Usenet can possibly do to your
reputation. Your attempts to drag your reputation to
some previously unachieved-by-any-human-being
nadir have succeeded beyond your wildest hopes.
Go rest in glory on your dragon-horde of empty
whiskey bottles and sleep the sleep of the
just profoundly brain-dead.
You richly deserve that reward.
xanthian.
[/quote:2767e09455] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| imbibe@mindspring.com (Da |
| Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 11:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In sci.econ,
// u l i e n wrote:
[quote:34cb350adc]Goodness! I guess if you don't have anything to say, call them an insulting
name!
From "The National Voter", Spring 1976, p. 2 (published 4 times
a year by the League of Women Voters of the United States):[/quote:34cb350adc]
== S e e t h r o u g h s t o c k d i s t o r t i o n t a c t i
c s ==
NAME CALLING--- In a classic case, one politician won an election
when he alleged that his opponent "once matriculated" and that his
opponent's wife was a "thespian." Aside from the ignorant and the
absurd, inflammatory statements that distort truth can be just as
damaging. A candidate might, for example, call an opponent's
behavior "wishy-washy" or "two-faced" when it should more
accurately be described as a change of mind, as flexibility or
responsiveness. Don't be sidetracked, either, by attacks on a
candidate based on family matters, ethnicity, or other personals
that don't make a difference in performance.
[quote:34cb350adc]"Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> wrote:
David James Polewka, imbibe@mindspring.com wrote:
If birth control were enough, the problem would be
solved!
Sure it would, if it weren't for morons like you
fighting freely available contraception every inch
of the way out of fear of that demon "government"
that has you shivering in terror under your covers.
Instead, we're heading toward 9 or 10 billion!
You've been blowing this bilge out your blue-butted
baboon ass for at least half a decade, and a litany
of correspondents have pointed you to huge cascades
of online information showing that you are wrong,
wrong, wrong. You still persist in the repetition of
this idiocy, though, learning exactly nothing from
the facts freely provided to you, fully qualifying
you for the cherished talk.bizarre "invincibly
ignorant" label and that label's correlated group
shunning.
The people don't start wars! Governments do!
So, what is the label for the kind of mental illness
that can conceptualize governments as somehow acting
without the absolutely necessary mediation of
"people"?
That you are an idiot, and a paranoid one, is well
known to anyone reading your output for long, but I
think you are venturing into whole new realms of
cluelessness when you conceed to givernments some
supernatural ability to act exclusive of the actions
of the people constituting them. That is rank
superstition, doubtless derived from your long and
intimate acquaintance with the contents of bottles
containing alcohol in imbibe-able form.
That both the above statements have been posted by
you dozens of times without alteration suggests as
well that you have the domination by ritual behavior
so characteristic of autism. That mental illness's
well known side effect of making the sufferer unable
to "put himself in the mind of another", and so in
your case understand how horrifying to others your
suggestions of deliberately fomenting plagues onto
humankind are, makes that diagnosis quite credible.
I've no idea, though, whether it can come into
existence as a result of such prolonged alcoholism
as you suffered in your past, or whether you have to
have suffered it from childhood to today.
Give it a rest, David, there is no more damage your
continuing to post to Usenet can possibly do to your
reputation. Your attempts to drag your reputation to
some previously unachieved-by-any-human-being
nadir have succeeded beyond your wildest hopes.
Go rest in glory on your dragon-horde of empty
whiskey bottles and sleep the sleep of the
just profoundly brain-dead.
You richly deserve that reward.
xanthian.[/quote:34cb350adc] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Kent Paul Dolan |
| Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
// u l i e n wrote:
[quote:f9476c92ad]Goodness! I guess if you don't have anything to say, call them an insulting
name!
[/quote:f9476c92ad]
That's all you saw of the 49 lines of mine you quoted? I guess
selective
blindness isn't limited to Polewka.
xanthian. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| imbibe@mindspring.com (Da |
| Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 11:11 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
[quote:c8a1cb6dc5]// u l i e n wrote:
Goodness! I guess if you don't have anything to say, call them an insulting
name!
That's all you saw of the 49 lines of mine you quoted? I guess
selective
blindness isn't limited to Polewka.
xanthian.
[/quote:c8a1cb6dc5]
From: "Kent Paul Dolan" <xanth...@well.com>
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre,misc.misc,talk.atheism
Subject: Re: Sometimes, a great wave...
Date: 3 Nov 2005
imb...@mindspring.com (David Polewka) wrote:
[who reads what he writes?]
Go dtachta na gr=E1inneoga cealgr=FAnacha do th=F3in
bheagmhaitheasach.
xanthian. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Kent Paul Dolan |
| Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Still haven't figured it out, eh blue-butt?
xanthian. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| imbibe@mindspring.com (Da |
| Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 4:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
[quote:ba06b9fe3d]
[who reads what he writes?]
..[/quote:ba06b9fe3d]
..
-- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| imbibe@mindspring.com (Da |
| Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
// u l i e n wrote:
[quote:2441e8f484]
You should be pleased. The shot does not give the boost to the immune system
that getting the flu does. Thus, you may be sick now, but you will have a
milder time of it next year.
If anyone disagrees with this concept, please speak up because I am
interested in hearing of possible flaws in my argument.
[/quote:2441e8f484]
There are no flaws in your argument. You're absolutely right!
..
..
-- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:20 pm
|
|