| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Mathematics Forum » Arranging Some Rectangles/Squares
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Leroy Quet |
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 10:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
If we have, for even m,
m/2 black squares of
2*2
4*4
6*6
8*8
....
m*m
and m/2 black rectangles of
1*(m-1)
3*(m-3)
5*(m-5)
7*(m-7)
...
(m-1)*1
and we have
m/2 white squares of
1*1
3*3
5*5
7*7
....
(m-1)*(m-1)
and m/2 white rectangles of
2*m
4*(m-2)
6*(m-4)
8*(m-6)
...
m*2
then we have the same total area for all of the white
squares/rectangles as for the black squares/rectangles (which is
easily shown using algebra).
My question is, which I have not been able to do yet myself (though I
have not tried really hard),
can all of the squares/rectangles be arranged in some way so that it
becomes visually obvious that the total areas between the black and
white are the same for every even m?
( This is similar to the "Proof Without Words" in the MAA's
Mathematics Magazine.)
thanks,
Leroy Quet |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Leroy Quet |
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2003 6:11 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
qqquet@mindspring.com (Leroy Quet) wrote in message news:<b4be2fdf.0312221951.8e76136@posting.google.com>...
Quote: If we have, for even m,
m/2 black squares of
2*2
4*4
6*6
8*8
...
m*m
and m/2 black rectangles of
1*(m-1)
3*(m-3)
5*(m-5)
7*(m-7)
..
(m-1)*1
and we have
m/2 white squares of
1*1
3*3
5*5
7*7
...
(m-1)*(m-1)
and m/2 white rectangles of
2*m
4*(m-2)
6*(m-4)
8*(m-6)
..
m*2
then we have the same total area for all of the white
squares/rectangles as for the black squares/rectangles (which is
easily shown using algebra).
My question is, which I have not been able to do yet myself (though I
have not tried really hard),
can all of the squares/rectangles be arranged in some way so that it
becomes visually obvious that the total areas between the black and
white are the same for every even m?
( This is similar to the "Proof Without Words" in the MAA's
Mathematics Magazine.)
thanks,
Leroy Quet
I am surprised that no one has replied to this question yet.
It may be easier to use the 3rd dimension and arrange boxes having the
above dimensions plus each a depth of 1.
Is there any obvious 2-d or 3-d arrangements??
thanks,
Leroy Quet |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:51 am
|
|