|
Science Forum Index » Philosophy Forum » The Scandal YOU Get To Decide
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| BretCahill |
 Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2003 7:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
As a populist who's been in politics for years I believe everyone should be
able to vote on my scandal.
What should it be?
Bret Cahill
All conservatism is based on censorship of
economic information.
-- Bret Cahill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Anti- Corporation |
| Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2003 7:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Well, in response, I submit the CA budget deficit and Arnold. The
legislateur could ot decide, so, it has been passed-over for a vote
referendum. The voters get to decide if he should take out a 10 billion
or so bond to get 'us' out of debt. That is, if you want to get out of
debt the secret is to barrow more money to invest in schemes that will
accrue more ncome, by way o growth, which, will never the less bring
about higher expenditures.
I disagree with Arnold's solution, but, I am glad the voters get the
chance to decde. The only problem is, we can not depend on the corrupt
corporate transnational meda to give us any real guidance and
educational debate on the subject. But, what does that really matter
anyway, if I had to work fifty hours a week at a job I hated and just
wanted to assassinate all of my co-workers, I would rather come home
have a coupe of drinks and watch Paris Hilton on the 'Simple Life', I
wouldn't want to actually think about things that I have an actual
probability of about .000000000000005 of changing anyways.
Was that a good answer without swearing, and I only mentioned killing
people once, I think I am on the road to recovery (for murder, not
drinking). |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Frederick |
| Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2003 12:16 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Anti- Corporation wrote:
Quote: Was that a good answer without swearing, and I only mentioned killing
people once, I think I am on the road to recovery (for murder, not
drinking).
But we want the real you, not the drunk you!
Either murder or drink takes you from us.
Some prisons may have Internet access, but I have seen no
prison inmate posting to Usenet, Drink modifies your brain.
Your cursing is of no concern to me, as long as it is from the
unmodified "self".
--
Best,
Frederick Martin McNeill
Poway, California, United States of America
mmcneill@fuzzysys.com
http://www.fuzzysys.com
http://members.cox.net/fmmcneill/
*************************
Phrase of the week :
"There is no doubt that great revolutions of human scientific
thought will occur in the next century, and in the century after
that, and in thousands of centuries afterward. So which of our
current pet scientific dogmas will be among the first washed away
by new facts and sudden clarities?" -- Anonymous
 )))Snort!)
************************* |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Immortalist |
| Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2003 1:25 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BretCahill" <bretcahill@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031223192417.03799.00001735@mb-m07.aol.com...
Quote: As a populist who's been in politics for years I believe everyone should
be
able to vote on my scandal.
What should it be?
What is; societal perceptions that you desire to and may gain the means to
"overly regulate" the (1) private and (2) public, sectors?
Quote:
Bret Cahill
All conservatism is based on censorship of
economic information.
-- Bret Cahill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| harvest dancer |
| Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2003 8:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message news:<20031223192417.03799.00001735@mb-m07.aol.com>...
Quote: As a populist who's been in politics for years I believe everyone should be
able to vote on my scandal.
What should it be?
Bret Cahill
You running from my bet.
Jason |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| BretCahill |
| Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2003 9:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Quote: Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312241702.435f9a25@posting.google.com> writes:
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message
news:<20031223192417.03799.00001735@mb-m07.aol.com>...
As a populist who's been in politics for years I believe everyone should be
able to vote on my scandal.
What should it be?
Bret Cahill
You running from my bet.
That's not a scandal. Indeed, that's
merely complying with the law.
Bret Cahill
All conservatism is based on censorship of
economic information.
-- Bret Cahill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| BretCahill |
| Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2003 9:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
A lot of people think "private sector" is in
the U. S. constitution. Actually the term
is less than 1/2 a century old.
It's a daydream. There ain't no such thing
as the "private sector."
"Immortalist" Reanimater_2000@yahoo.com in
Quote: Message-id: <vujmkhdv2leac4@corp.supernews.com> writes:
"BretCahill" <bretcahill@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031223192417.03799.00001735@mb-m07.aol.com...
As a populist who's been in politics for years I believe everyone should
be
able to vote on my scandal.
What should it be?
What is; societal perceptions that you desire to and may gain the means to
"overly regulate" the (1) private and (2) public, sectors?
All conservatism is based on censorship of
economic information.
-- Bret Cahill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| harvest dancer |
| Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2003 5:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message news:<20031224213454.19282.00001408@mb-m13.aol.com>...
Quote: harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312241702.435f9a25@posting.google.com> writes:
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message
news:<20031223192417.03799.00001735@mb-m07.aol.com>...
As a populist who's been in politics for years I believe everyone should
be able to vote on my scandal.
What should it be?
Bret Cahill
You running from my bet.
That's not a scandal.
Yes it is.
Quote: Indeed, that's merely complying with the law.
No it isn't.
Jason |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| BretCahill |
| Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2003 2:41 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Now now now. Don't get into a snit just
because GOP corp. whoretank
economists won't weigh in on creationism
science at GOP conventions.
harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Quote: Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312251446.42896d4b@posting.google.com> writes:
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message
news:<20031224213454.19282.00001408@mb-m13.aol.com>...
harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312241702.435f9a25@posting.google.com> writes:
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message
news:<20031223192417.03799.00001735@mb-m07.aol.com>...
As a populist who's been in politics for years I believe everyone should
be able to vote on my scandal.
What should it be?
Bret Cahill
You running from my bet.
That's not a scandal.
Yes it is.
Indeed, that's merely complying with the law.
No it isn't.
Jason
All conservatism is based on censorship of
economic information.
-- Bret Cahill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| harvest dancer |
| Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2003 1:19 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message news:<20031226024128.23043.00001032@mb-m27.aol.com>...
Quote: harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312251446.42896d4b@posting.google.com> writes:
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message
news:<20031224213454.19282.00001408@mb-m13.aol.com>...
harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312241702.435f9a25@posting.google.com> writes:
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message
news:<20031223192417.03799.00001735@mb-m07.aol.com>...
As a populist who's been in politics for years I believe everyone
should be able to vote on my scandal.
What should it be?
Bret Cahill
You running from my bet.
That's not a scandal.
Yes it is.
Indeed, that's merely complying with the law.
No it isn't.
Now now now. Don't get into a snit just
because GOP corp. whoretank
economists won't weigh in on creationism
science at GOP conventions.
Topicality violation. You changed topics, from the scandal of your
dodging my LEGAL bet to your belief in creationism.
As was explained, they leave Creationism to you.
Jason |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| BretCahill |
| Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2003 1:33 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Now now now. Don't get into a snit just
because GOP corp. whoretank
economists won't weigh in on creationism
science at GOP conventions.
harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Quote: Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312261019.6464333e@posting.google.com> writes:
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message
news:<20031226024128.23043.00001032@mb-m27.aol.com>...
harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312251446.42896d4b@posting.google.com> writes:
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message
news:<20031224213454.19282.00001408@mb-m13.aol.com>...
harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312241702.435f9a25@posting.google.com> writes:
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message
news:<20031223192417.03799.00001735@mb-m07.aol.com>...
As a populist who's been in politics for years I believe everyone
should be able to vote on my scandal.
What should it be?
Bret Cahill
You running from my bet.
That's not a scandal.
Yes it is.
Indeed, that's merely complying with the law.
No it isn't.
Now now now. Don't get into a snit just
because GOP corp. whoretank
economists won't weigh in on creationism
science at GOP conventions.
Topicality violation.
But that WAS what we were betting on:
GOP corp. whoretank economists won't
weigh in on creationism science at GOP
conventions.
Bret Cahill
All conservatism is based on censorship of
economic information.
-- Bret Cahill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| harvest dancer |
| Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2003 5:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message news:<20031226133327.26083.00001816@mb-m06.aol.com>...
Quote: harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312261019.6464333e@posting.google.com> writes:
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message
news:<20031226024128.23043.00001032@mb-m27.aol.com>...
harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312251446.42896d4b@posting.google.com> writes:
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message
news:<20031224213454.19282.00001408@mb-m13.aol.com>...
harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312241702.435f9a25@posting.google.com> writes:
bretcahill@aol.com (BretCahill) wrote in message
news:<20031223192417.03799.00001735@mb-m07.aol.com>...
As a populist who's been in politics for years I believe everyone
should be able to vote on my scandal.
What should it be?
Bret Cahill
You running from my bet.
That's not a scandal.
Yes it is.
Indeed, that's merely complying with the law.
No it isn't.
Now now now. Don't get into a snit just
because GOP corp. whoretank
economists won't weigh in on creationism
science at GOP conventions.
Topicality violation. You changed topics, from the scandal of your
dodging my LEGAL bet to your belief in creationism.
As was explained, they leave Creationism to you.
But that WAS what we were betting on:
Your dodging my LEGAL bet.
Quote: GOP corp. whoretank economists won't
weigh in on creationism science at GOP
conventions.
Now now now. Don't get into a snit just
because GOP corp. whoretank
economists won't weigh in on creationism
science at GOP conventions.
Topicality violation. You changed topics, from the scandal of your
dodging my LEGAL bet to your belief in creationism.
As was explained, they leave Creationism to you.
Jason |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| BretCahill |
| Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2003 12:19 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
harvestdancer@hotmail.com (harvest dancer) in
Quote: Message-id: <4f697f9f.0312271430.66d73569@posting.google.com> writes:
.. . .
Quote: your
dodging my LEGAL bet
What was the bet?
Bret Cahill
All conservatism is based on censorship of
economic information.
-- Bret Cahill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| harvest dancer |
| Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2003 10:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| BretCahill |
| Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2003 11:41 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I don't think anyone in interested.
In fact, I don't think anyone here is
interested in helping me select a scandal.
Bret Cahill
All conservatism is based on censorship of
economic information.
-- Bret Cahill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
