| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Research Forum » THE UNIVERSE IS GOD
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| GRAVITYMECHANIC2 |
 Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2003 6:59 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
`CHARGE AND THE PHOTON IN AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE
Copyright 1984-2003 Allen C. Goodrich
As the universe expands the sum of kinetic and
potential energies remains a constant. The expansion
of the universe results in a decrease of potential
energy and an equal increase of kinetic energy.
A mass (m) or charge (e) in an equilibrium orbit,
increases in kinetic energy at the same rate that
it decreases in potential energy relative to the
rest of the universe. This is not apparent relative
to other masses that are in the same time frame
(such as the sun or other planets). It is only
apparent relative to distant galaxies in the form
of a red shift. The equilibrium orbital radius is the
only orbit where the total energy remains constant
as the universe expands. Any change of orbit requires
the addition or removal of energy, and the formation
of a photon. The planetary and moon orbits are
fixed by the fact that it is very difficult ot provide
enough energy to cause a change of orbit.
The atomic electron orbit can be more easily
changed by the formation of a photon (a change of
potential energy of the electron relative to the rest
of the universe and a change of the potential energy
of the rest of the universe relative to the electron).
Planets, moons, and electrons are normally in equilibrium
orbits where the total energy is constant.
m(2 pi L)^2/t^2 + G(M-m)m/L +e^2/4 pi E_o L = a constant.
kinetic plus potential energy equals a constant.
L is orbital distance ; m is mass in question; M is total
energy of the effective universe; t is time ; G is
gravitational constant; E_o is permitivity or equilibrium
constant ; e is the charge of the electron or proton.
Rotational energy is included in the values of m and M.
In an equilibrium orbit any change of kinetic energy equals
a negative change of potential energy.
Delta (a change of ) m(2 pi L)^2/t^2 = Delta G(M-m)m/L+
Delta e^2/4 pi E_o L. The change of potential energy of the
charge is usually so much larger than the change of the
potential energy of neutral mass that the latter can be
neglected when charges are involved.
For the non equilibrium orbital motion (when a photon is
formed ), the change of kinetic energy does not equal the
change of potential energy. and a non stable motion results.
It tries to return to equilibrium orbital motion by the
gain or loss of a photon h/t.
See:
THE UNIVERSE-A GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF MASS ENERGY
SPACE TIME FRAME MECHANICS- APPEARING IN NEWSLETTER
"SPECTRUM" OF THE BUFFALO ASTRONOMICAL ASSOCIATION
INC. Nov.1996 to Feb.1997
SEE:
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechanic2/myhomepage/business.html
FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION OF THE UNIVERSE
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechanic2/myhomepage/profile.html
TIDES AND GRAVITY MECHANICS
http://ourworld.cs.com/gravitymechanic2/myhomepage/resume.html
A New Grand Unified Theory of the photon and gravitation
is presented, which predicted, stimulated the above research,
and is consistent with the new findings. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| w_ashley |
| Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2003 8:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
So your basically saying that energy difuses while maintaning
structural integrety. two question though is energy diffusion at a
constant from a core(if there is a core)is being used up by expansion
or is it being transfered for instance like a mobius(such a popular
word) strip of universal reciprication where energy is diffused
although contained flips and then starts a reverse diffusion or is it
a dead universe? does the dead universe die from the core? Infinite
space(space usually confuses me) so can energy really be used up or is
it instead stretched out as kinetic forces in space stay in motion.. ?
or does that have to do with the difusion or energy at a constant..
what is the result of a decaying orbit.. it wouldjust spin out? how
can a system actually loose orbit wouldn't it just be a time delay or
is the force of mass(gravity) an energy which is used too. .gravity
(I'm a lamen) would still be a representation of mass since the mass
itself is energy no? so how does the orbital feilds of define mass
break down(youd have to nuke it no) and then you have little peices of
energy wouldn't they just keep on diffusing unless there was a way to
stop the wave if center out was the idea or even like power lines
redistribute power.. I'm sure by that time we will be out of our
bodies anyway.. So the idea of the article was tht energy diffuses
right? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:14 am
|
|