Main Page | Report this Page
Science Forum Index  »  Archaeology Forum  »  DSS - Is date of composition the same as date of...
Page 1 of 1    

DSS - Is date of composition the same as date of...

Author Message
crunch...
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:12 am
Guest
DSS Carbondating (and Paleography)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_origin/message/1971

"The essential point that nobody seems to have grasped is that the
results do
not give an exact date, not simply because of the inadequacies of
carbondating, but because the Essenes were noted for their continuing
use of
old, worn materials, as shown by Josephus in J.W. 2, 126. This would
mean
that they held that an ancient parchment, manufactured many years
before,
was venerable and suited for the recording of their inspired writings.
The
date of manufacture could be 100 years or more before the date of
composition of the contents. It is quite fallacious to say that the
date of
composition was the same as the date of manufacture, as Vermes and
others
tried to do."

David Christainsen
 
crunch...
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:04 pm
Guest
On Jul 3, 3:21 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al... at (no spam) invallid.invalid> wrote:
[quote:9612c2101c]crunch <pchristain... at (no spam) yahoo.com> 03/07/2009 21:12 wrote:

DSS Carbondating (and Paleography)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_origin/message/1971

"The essential point that nobody seems to have grasped is that the
results do
not give an exact date, not simply because of the inadequacies of
carbondating, but because the Essenes

Piss off with you essenes.
[/quote:9612c2101c]
What an idiot you are! Essenes are a major archaeological
finding for Qumran.

Now do you see how anti-professional you are?

David Christainsen
 
Peter Alaca...
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:21 pm
Guest
crunch <pchristainsen at (no spam) yahoo.com> 03/07/2009 21:12 wrote:
[quote:28074176bc]DSS Carbondating (and Paleography)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_origin/message/1971

"The essential point that nobody seems to have grasped is that the
results do
not give an exact date, not simply because of the inadequacies of
carbondating, but because the Essenes
[/quote:28074176bc]
Piss off with you essenes.
 
crunch...
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:29 pm
Guest
On Jul 3, 6:23 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al... at (no spam) invallid.invalid> wrote:
[quote:ca3a3ecd84]crunch <pchristain... at (no spam) yahoo.com> 04/07/2009 00:04 wrote:

On Jul 3, 3:21 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al... at (no spam) invallid.invalid> wrote:
crunch <pchristain... at (no spam) yahoo.com> 03/07/2009 21:12 wrote:

DSS Carbondating (and Paleography)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_origin/message/1971
"The essential point that nobody seems to have grasped is that the
results do
not give an exact date, not simply because of the inadequacies of
carbondating, but because the Essenes
Piss off with you essenes.

What an idiot you are!  Essenes are a major archaeological
finding for Qumran.

Not when you post it a million times.

Now do you see how anti-professional you are?

You are no professional. You are an obsessed preacher.
[/quote:ca3a3ecd84]
Miind your manners; you have written a vicious lie.
 
Peter Alaca...
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:23 pm
Guest
crunch <pchristainsen at (no spam) yahoo.com> 04/07/2009 00:04 wrote:
[quote:122b72025f]On Jul 3, 3:21 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al... at (no spam) invallid.invalid> wrote:
crunch <pchristain... at (no spam) yahoo.com> 03/07/2009 21:12 wrote:

DSS Carbondating (and Paleography)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_origin/message/1971
"The essential point that nobody seems to have grasped is that the
results do
not give an exact date, not simply because of the inadequacies of
carbondating, but because the Essenes
Piss off with you essenes.

What an idiot you are! Essenes are a major archaeological
finding for Qumran.
[/quote:122b72025f]
Not when you post it a million times.

[quote:122b72025f]Now do you see how anti-professional you are?
[/quote:122b72025f]
You are no professional. You are an obsessed preacher.
 
Peter Alaca...
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:35 am
Guest
crunch <pchristainsen at (no spam) yahoo.com> 04/07/2009 02:29 wrote:
[quote:3582965f24]On Jul 3, 6:23 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al... at (no spam) invallid.invalid> wrote:
crunch <pchristain... at (no spam) yahoo.com> 04/07/2009 00:04 wrote:

On Jul 3, 3:21 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al... at (no spam) invallid.invalid> wrote:
crunch <pchristain... at (no spam) yahoo.com> 03/07/2009 21:12 wrote:
DSS Carbondating (and Paleography)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_origin/message/1971
"The essential point that nobody seems to have grasped is that the
results do
not give an exact date, not simply because of the inadequacies of
carbondating, but because the Essenes

Piss off with you essenes.

What an idiot you are! Essenes are a major archaeological
finding for Qumran.

Not when you post it a million times.

Now do you see how anti-professional you are?
You are no professional. You are an obsessed preacher.

Miind your manners; you have written a vicious lie.
[/quote:3582965f24]
"From now on I will ignore you." (Carl Christainsen)
 
 
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:00 am