 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Image Processing Forum » Any advise for a hobbyist to select the Kit?... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| M.Parker... |
 Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:52 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hi..folks..,
For a generic hobbyist,
Could you people suggest any FOSS kit for the most of the signal
processing stuff(" more emphasis on thr Image stuff"), if it is GUI enabled
then, I'm the luckiest person on the Earth(at least for today).
Platform: windows; if not, Linux flavor too is okay.
thanks for the patience
have a nice day  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Rune Allnor... |
| Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 5 Jul, 08:52, "M.Parker" <mpar... at (no spam) nodomain.com> wrote:
[quote:52cdfdf35e]Hi..folks..,
For a generic hobbyist,
Could you people suggest any FOSS kit for the most of the signal
processing stuff(" more emphasis on thr Image stuff"), if it is GUI enabled
then, I'm the luckiest person on the Earth(at least for today).
[/quote:52cdfdf35e]
Any particular reason why you want a HW kit?
You only need a suitable software program to play with
DSP routines and methods. The HW kits only become important
if you need (or want) to port something to HW.
If you just want to play with ideas, a free matlab clone
like octave or scilab might be sufficient.
Rune |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| M.Parker... |
| Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 1:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Rune Allnor <allnor at (no spam) tele.ntnu.no> wrote in comp.dsp,
news:b02a9aad-04a9-458a-b3ee-05a09f0fa49f at (no spam) i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com:
On Sun 05 Jul 2009 12:42:55p,
[quote:f5158bf5f9]On 5 Jul, 08:52, "M.Parker" <mpar... at (no spam) nodomain.com> wrote:
Hi..folks..,
For a generic hobbyist,
Could you people suggest any FOSS kit for the most of the signal
processing stuff(" more emphasis on thr Image stuff"), if it is GUI
enabl
ed
then, I'm the luckiest person on the Earth(at least for today).
Any particular reason why you want a HW kit?
[/quote:f5158bf5f9]
not very serious,
but I need an all-in-one kit for all my
"do it your self activities" {all on my PC}
[quote:f5158bf5f9]
You only need a suitable software program to play with
DSP routines and methods. The HW kits only become important
if you need (or want) to port something to HW.
[/quote:f5158bf5f9]
I'm not good at programming, so I don't have the job of
"porting" anything to that pretty microcontrollers.
All the tests would be on my personal PC.
[quote:f5158bf5f9]
If you just want to play with ideas, a free matlab clone
like octave or scilab might be sufficient.
[/quote:f5158bf5f9]
Are they GUI enabled + F/OSS ?
[quote:f5158bf5f9]Rune
[/quote:f5158bf5f9]
thnx Rune for the quick reply
have a nice weekend
____
where are the other folks..? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Vladimir Vassilevsky... |
| Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
M.Parker wrote:
[quote:669dd1a494]Hi..folks..,
For a generic hobbyist,
Could you people suggest any FOSS kit for the most of the signal
processing stuff(" more emphasis on thr Image stuff"), if it is GUI enabled
then, I'm the luckiest person on the Earth(at least for today).
Platform: windows; if not, Linux flavor too is okay.
[/quote:669dd1a494]
Before you know what you want, get a book, pencil and paper.
VLV |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Richard Owlett... |
| Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:03 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
M.Parker wrote:
[quote:dc44662255]Hi..folks..,
For a generic hobbyist,
Could you people suggest any FOSS kit for the most of the signal
processing stuff(" more emphasis on thr Image stuff"), if it is GUI enabled
then, I'm the luckiest person on the Earth(at least for today).
Platform: windows; if not, Linux flavor too is okay.
thanks for the patience
have a nice day
[/quote:dc44662255]
To start with - Just *WHAT* is "FOSS"?
I did Google, did I come up with right answer?
If so, what are your goals?
With reference to Rune's response:
why hardware?
if software, what are you looking for from a GUI? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Richard Owlett... |
| Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 1:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Vladimir Vassilevsky wrote:
[quote:247f6dc791]
M.Parker wrote:
Hi..folks..,
For a generic hobbyist, Could you people suggest any FOSS kit for the
most of the signal processing stuff(" more emphasis on thr Image
stuff"), if it is GUI enabled then, I'm the luckiest person on the
Earth(at least for today). Platform: windows; if not, Linux flavor
too is okay.
Before you know what you want, get a book, pencil and paper.
VLV
[/quote:247f6dc791]
Then ignore most of what VLV posts. He was born perfect etc etc etc
[The sad thing is that he *has* demonstrated TECHNICAL competence] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| M.Parker... |
| Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 5:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Vladimir Vassilevsky <antispam_bogus at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in comp.dsp,
news:Ig24m.6847$iz2.6722 at (no spam) nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com: On Sun 05 Jul 2009
07:24:55p,
[quote:cc548e8a77]
M.Parker wrote:
Hi..folks..,
For a generic hobbyist,
Could you people suggest any FOSS kit for the most of the signal
processing stuff(" more emphasis on thr Image stuff"), if it is GUI
enabled then, I'm the luckiest person on the Earth(at least for
today). Platform: windows; if not, Linux flavor too is okay.
Before you know what you want, get a book, pencil and paper.
VLV
[/quote:cc548e8a77]
harsh reply 
sarcasm will always not work, mind that; |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Rich Webb... |
| Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:53 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:25:06 -0500, Tim Wescott <tim at (no spam) seemywebsite.com>
wrote:
[quote:a284262563]As Rune said: Scilab/Scicoslab or Octave. I prefer Scicoslab for my own
work, but the image processing library is 3rd party, the Scilab/Scicoslab
team has undergone mieosis
[/quote:a284262563]
Humph. Thanks for the pointer. I missed the fork and wasn't aware that
the INRIA group was working on a parallel development effort now.
--
Rich Webb Norfolk, VA |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Tim Wescott... |
| Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:08 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:53:55 -0400, Rich Webb wrote:
[quote:e1a42d16bc]On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:25:06 -0500, Tim Wescott <tim at (no spam) seemywebsite.com
wrote:
As Rune said: Scilab/Scicoslab or Octave. I prefer Scicoslab for my own
work, but the image processing library is 3rd party, the
Scilab/Scicoslab team has undergone mieosis
Humph. Thanks for the pointer. I missed the fork and wasn't aware that
the INRIA group was working on a parallel development effort now.
[/quote:e1a42d16bc]
Subscribe to comp.soft-sys.math.scilab, and you'll see a lot of scicoslab
posts, which is where I found out.
Trying to get the Scilab team to see that doing beta testing, and not
releasing products with broken features (like the debugger and Scicos,
for crying out loud!) is like trying to explain to a skeptical blind man
that he needs someone to check the color of his paint.
--
www.wescottdesign.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:44 am
|
|