| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Math - Symbolic Forum » E = m c^2 and Riccati...
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| ... |
 Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 11:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dear Newsgroup:
Mass and energy are two major components of the universe.
Thus the equation, E = m c^2 represents one of the important formulas
in the universe (within the domain of physics).
As I had mentioned before the abstract formula of Riccati differential
equation
dx/dt + x^2 = g(t)
is another important one (within the domain of mathematics).
There is no doubt that, from the mathematical equations, we can always
conclude about the behavior of the physical world (and visa versa).
Thus eventually questions will arise from one formula to the other,
about inner characteristics of both of them.
It remains to be seen, how the future researchers in both domain
determine the outcome of their comparison studies?
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Vladimir Bondarenko... |
| Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 4:37 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| ... |
| Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 12:58 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dear Newsgroup:
Since the universals of Aristotle is the sole philosophical issue
behind the NEW EXACT MATH, thus with a very strong probability, it
will be a new philosophical issue within the relativity theory.
I strongly encourage you to look into the issue.
Do not take it light, since this was highly successful for me.
Thus The Universals, E=m c^2 and Riccati should be on the vertices of
a triangle.
I am interested to present a seminar on ABC of Riccati , explaining
the situation.
If the math community wakes up!
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Vladimir Bondarenko... |
| Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 4:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| ... |
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 12:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Henry Poincare... |
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 12:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 11 May 2008 13:26:52 -0700, Basti05b wrote:
Quote: Dear Newsgroup:
The Newton’s formula of force i.e. F = m a is indeed a second order
differential equation.
Really? Oh my gosh, no one has ever observed that! You would deserve a
couple of Field medals by now.
Quote: Thus it is governed by the key formula.
Key of what?
Quote:
The energy of the light coming to us in terms of a wave equation
Could the energy of the light come instead in term of a polynomial
equation? That would certainly be more elegant. If the polynomial is
further linear the better.
Quote: Certainly somewhere the sun transfers momentarily a small particle into
energy.
A small particle means precisely what? H_2O molecule? An electron? A tau?
A Higgs? A d quark? A Goldsone boson? A graviton? A gravitino? What?
Quote: So, it seems to me that at that particular moment the universe coincides
its energy calculated from PDE (s) through the key formula, with the
equation E=m c^2.
So the key formula now turns out to be E=mc^2? Hmm, but it's not yours.
And what happens when m=0, in the case of a photon? No energy delivered?
Then how I will tan on the beach this summer???
Quote: Although the equation E= m c^2 unlike F = m a is an algebraic equation,
and not governed by a differential equation (on the surface).
On the surface of what? The Sun? The Universe? Your head? And what kind of
equation is E=mc^2? c is a constant, you know. Then m = E/c^2 . Even you
could solve it easily. I just did it.
Hmm. So which kind of gravity obeys my cat when jumping? Newton's or
yours? Does he has to choose before the landing?
Quote: We need to look at the issues from many other angles,
According to Euler, there are 3 angles.
Quote: and since the
academia is highly controlled by Al Capone (s) and their spies,
Al Capone was framed by the IRS. So academia is controlled by them, and
you're wrong. You have to fight the IRS.
Quote: there is
no hope of free atmosphere of scientific research. Unless you are in
their directional research!
Does one have to dress like a captain with blue jacket and golden buttons
in order to enter the mission control area? And what about a green parrot
on the shoulder, is this allowed too?
Quote:
Well, I will not be the one to affect the academic situation; it is the
Riccati fact within the universe.
Does it mean it's a Riccati vs Universe match?
Quote: Riccati, is the source communicator for the universe, it is like sun,
and planets turning around it, not the other way around.
Kepler was wrong? In the centre there was always Riccati instead of the
Sun?
Quote: Riccati, is so powerful that most of the current fields cannot escape
its power.
More than Louis XIV himself?
Quote: We are talking about massive equations and applications suddenly
manifest themselves in research (thus some fields might be diminished or
substantially reduced).
Great, but what about the bad guys in black that control the whole
research from their towers? Are they going to take some countermeasures in
order to keep power?
Quote: Obviously the math community is very sensitive about the issue, and
blocked all the avenues to the NEW EXACT MATH (as usual, since they are
so scared!).
If this is so usual, then there was at least another NEW EXACT MATH before
yours. What happened to that? Did they kill Riccati and put the Sun in the
centre of solar system? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| ... |
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 12:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Henry Poincare wrote:
Quote: On Sun, 11 May 2008 13:26:52 -0700, Basti05b wrote:
Dear Newsgroup:
The Newton’s formula of force i.e. F = m a is indeed a second order
differential equation.
Really? Oh my gosh, no one has ever observed that! You would deserve a
couple of Field medals by now.
Obviously you are very confused and talking nonsense.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Henry Poincare... |
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 1:04 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 11 May 2008 15:46:40 -0700, Basti05b wrote:
You won't answer none of my questions. Why? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Mehran Basti... |
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 1:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Obviously
You won't answer none of my questions. Why?
The only real answer is that all of us to get to know the NEW EXACT MATH, and practice it (you then get your answer, not words).
But unfortunately, there is a filter somewhere, and also I am in an intellectual war with the math community.
I am independent, and cannot play their games!
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Henry Poincare... |
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 1:40 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 11 May 2008 19:27:03 -0400, Mehran Basti wrote:
Quote: Obviously
You won't answer none of my questions. Why?
The only real answer is that
You're scared of my questions because I'm the most gifted scientist ever.
End of story. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| ... |
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dear Newsgroup:
I have no doubt that NEW EXACT MATH will be practiced for centuries to
come.
I believe some are quite naïve to think that, not allowing this
research to be flourished, by the math community, at this time, has
any barriers to its mathematics part.
It is really the issue of their status, which is shaking (it is much
more complex than even I thought in the first place).
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| ... |
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 9:13 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| ... |
| Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 9:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dear Newsgroup:
NEW EXACT MATH is not like the paper of FLT of A. Wiles.
His paper is 250 pages of very abstract proof, which his friends
accepted because of their academic and political interests.
The nature of the research was that initially we knew that there were
no integer solutions for the equation (for integers n >2).
So, what he had done? Nothing.
He has not solved an unsolved equation like quintic, to be able to
show its solutions.
Even there were any errors in his proof, no one could say anything,
since computer examinations provided no solutions in the first place
(no counterexample can be found anyway).
After all, the result not likely affecting science and engineering
basic textbooks.
From the establishment point of view, it was a perfect scenario, A.
Wiles to be promoted, and they made a lot of noise about it around the
world.
I believe that FLT types of research will be dismantled in the future.
But my research is completely different; it will revolutionize the
entire mathematics.
I believe the establishment is scared that the development of such
research could get completely out of their control.
That means their positions and their image of their academic status
may be subject to question. As well as many new leaders might emerge.
In another of my communications with M.I.T. I have noted about
Professor I.M.Singer.
He is the winner of Abel prize in mathematics (I am very suspicious of
the Abel prize he and his colleagues arranged for himself and his
partner).
I have looked at his work, it is highly abstract totally away from
reality of the kind of mathematics, which was practiced by the past
masters, and myself included.
I would not feed those stuff (with highly abstract operator
theories,..) to the students of the future.
I certainly dismantle that kind of fields.
But he is in the position of power and has been employed people who
had to praise him and promote his interest in employment and other
similar activities.
This is a kind of lost math I have been talking about on my notes to
the math community.
I believe it was part of a package that he arranged to his partner
(initially from Cambridge) to get the prize, in order to emphasize
that Einstein’s relativity is correct, and particularly the key issue
of its postulate, i.e. the constancy of the speed of light is valid.
I have to add that, I have raised some suspicions about the validity
of the constancy of the speed of light, but it is up to physicists,
within a free academic domain, to answer such questions.
But certainly I will raise questions relative to the key formula of
the universe (Riccati).
Although the issue here is the nature of games they play in the
academia.
I strongly believe that despite their power, the true science of NEW
EXACT MATH will prevail, without any games to be played for the
intersts of a few over others.
Certainly as a mathematician for centuries to come, I will not be a
partner to such games, only the true science.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dave... |
| Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 8:07 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:53 pm
|
|