| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Statistics - Math Forum » Why they do not publish their thoughts?...
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Luis A. Afonso... |
 Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 7:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
To the IMBECILE DUO Jack Tomsky / John Smith
Why they do not publish their thoughts?
The worse consequence is that they not get that must re-think what Statistics is. Jack Tomsky is a one more eloquent example. If one has not full conscience, complete conscience, that Probability is in the realm of RANDOMNESS, and out of it there is no Statistics, Jack Tomsky would never was caught in such BRUNDLES as, for example:
__a)____The Null Hypotheses can be proved true
__b)____H0: m=0 if rejected means that the parameter m is truly ZERO.
__c)____The of asymptotical values use are always correct whatever the sizes evolved in the Hypotheses Tests,
__d)___The dependence critical values on sample sizes (for a given alpha) should be monotonous increasing,
__e)___The sample statistics (even if parameters are evaluated from data) must follow asymptotically given Distribution (cf. Jarque - Bera Test and the Chi-squared, two degrees of freedom),
__f)____The Empirical Distribution Function of a Test Statistics (because is obtained through a sample) is not able to provide critical Values.
If the sample is representative, what it’s somewhat dutiful (Jack Tomsky, John Smith, Bob Ling, Yurra) it can be asserted that Statistical learning (including TEACHERS) in USA has low quality indeed.
I do not know why the above brilliant minds DO NOT SUBMIT A PAPER TO A SERIOUS STATISTICAL JOURNAL stating that the LILLIEFORS´S TEST IS AN ENOURM FRAUD because. . . ? WHY?
Luis Amaral Afonso (The Moderator Destroyer) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| John Smith... |
| Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 8:45 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Adumbo,
Why don't you publish everything you know about the difference between confidence intervals and critical values???? BWAHAHAHA
Adumbo can't tell whether those things he calculates are Confidence Intervals or Critical Values!!!!
In his original post he referred to them as "95% C.I. of Cauchy MEDIANS"
but in his most recent post he said "my smashing victory in finding Critical Values"
Adumbo can't tell the difference between a CI and a CV !!!
This is as stupid as him not knowing the difference between a significance level and a p-value !!!
And he calls himself a statistician!!!! He is a joke!!!!
John 3 Smith |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Luis A. Afonso... |
| Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 10:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
They, (the imbecile couple) DO NOT READ elementary Statistics (if so they do not say and trying to prove (???) with EXAMPLES, i did dismount immediately and without further response, that ONE ARE ABLE TO ACCEPT THE NULL HIPOTHESES (in the case to accept that a coin is fair). This same BLUNDER was insistently defended by Bob Ling (Reef Fish) till last year. If the sample is significative (to what I’m doubtful) Statistical teachers in US have much lower quality than it was expected, much lower, indeed.
WIKIPEDIA
*** If the test statistic is outside the critical region, the only conclusion is that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This is NOT the same as evidence in favour of the null hypothesis. That we cannot obtain using these arguments, since lack of evidence against a hypothesis is not evidence for it. On this basis, statistical research progresses by eliminating error, not by FINDING THE TRUTH. ***
Luis Amaral Afonso (The Moderator Destroyer) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Luis A. Afonso... |
| Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 6:46 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Because it was the MOST RIDICULE THEORY
EVEN ARRIVED IN A SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
OFFICE.
Luis amaral Afonso (The moderator destroyer) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:17 am
|
|