mitch.nicolas.raem... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e4bc3178-812f-4aea-b677-917a85f3cd5b at (no spam) y22g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
There is no way to verify its accuracy therefor it doesn't belong in
physics.
The Uncertainty Principle certainly belongs in physics,
in fact the Uncertainty Principle is the essence of physics.
1. The Uncertainty Principle indicates
that although measurements are made using linear quanta (Units),
that quantum changes are conveyed from
causes to effects in area quanta,
NOT linear quanta.
2. The value of this area can be measured
and is well known. It is known as Plank's Constant,
and it has the physical property of "action".
3. At the most fundamental level,
the two measurable physical properties
than form the "action" area are
electric charge and magnetic flux.
4. At the physical level,
other pairs of physical properties are used to
scale quanta of "action" including:
action = momentum * distance
action = energy * time
but as I indicated, most fundamentally:
action = electric charge * magnetic flux
Observe what the Uncertainty Principle tells us.
1. It takes two to tango,
or as Newton put it,
for every action,
there is a equal and opposite reaction.
You initiate a change by moving an electrical charge,
and you necessarily create magnetic flux.
You initiate a change by moving an object some distance,
and you necessarily create momentum.
action = momentum * distance
If you initiate a change by moving an object some distance,
and a force is needed to overcome some field
( Electric or magnetic at the most fundamental level.)
the physical property energy comes into play
( energy = force * distance )
as does time.
action = energy * time = force * distance * time
Note that the concept of energy,
like the concept of mass,
effectively forces a relationship ( Tries to equate )
between an auto-correlation ( Time )
and a cross-correlation (Spaces).
Although the rules of math allows one to rotate
orthogonal properties without loss,
this cannot be done in the real world.
The fact of the matter is
that you CANNOT directly equate
orthogonal properties in a linear way
UNLESS a perfect circle is involved,
and the process of physical rotating
one space or dimension into another,
takes action, and introduces an unknown
into the equation, and you no longer
have a perfect circle.
The bottom line is,
that some unit standard is selected to be one's
standard to quantize some specific property,
and this standard is used to mark off
the number of units along some linear line,
and when ORTHOGONAL properties
enter the scene, the assumption is made,
that the same unit standard works
just as well on that orthogonal property
and other orthogonal properties that enter the scene.
Potter's Law # 27.
One unit of action uncertainty is introduced
with each introduction of an orthogonal property
--
Tom Potter
http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.htmlhttp://notsocrazyideas.blogspot..comhttp://tdp1001.wiki.zoho.comhttp://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos
** Posted
fromhttp://www.teranews.com**
