Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Astro Forum  »  Compact gravitational objects
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Guest
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 2:37 pm
Quasars meet the condition of the extreme gravitational field. They
are redshift objects about one light week in diameter yet have the
mass of a galaxy. Their extreme redshift comes from gravitation first
and can be distance second for those at the distance extreme.

There is no edge to the universe where these objects exist. Quasars
are evenly distributed throughout the universe near and far.


Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
Eric Gisse
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 3:56 pm
Guest
On May 3, 5:11 pm, Ralph Hertle <ralph.her...@verizon.net> wrote:
[snip whatever]

Stop encouraging the noise generator.
Guest
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 4:31 pm
On May 3, 5:11 pm, Ralph Hertle <ralph.her...@verizon.net> wrote:
Quote:
mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Quasars meet the condition of the extreme gravitational field. They
are redshift objects about one light week in diameter yet have the
mass of a galaxy. Their extreme redshift comes from gravitation first
and can be distance second for those at the distance extreme.

There is no edge to the universe where these objects exist. Quasars
are evenly distributed throughout the universe near and far.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch:

You fail to consider the functions of atomic and molecular hydrogen in
space with respect to photon interactions and with the result of the
lowering of the energy levels of the photons.

You offer your religion for the BB, however, that doesn't explain the
fact of the RS that results from hydrogen photon interactions.

If the hydrogen interaction is indeed the cause for the RS the Quasars
will be found far closer to us and to be traveling at less speed than
the BB creationists claim. The universe will then have its mass located
in far smaller regions.

Ralph Hertle

What are you saying about the gravitation of these extreme redshift
objects ralph?>
Ralph Hertle
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 8:11 pm
Guest
mitch.nicolas.raemsch@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
Quasars meet the condition of the extreme gravitational field. They
are redshift objects about one light week in diameter yet have the
mass of a galaxy. Their extreme redshift comes from gravitation first
and can be distance second for those at the distance extreme.

There is no edge to the universe where these objects exist. Quasars
are evenly distributed throughout the universe near and far.


Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008



Mitch:

You fail to consider the functions of atomic and molecular hydrogen in
space with respect to photon interactions and with the result of the
lowering of the energy levels of the photons.

You offer your religion for the BB, however, that doesn't explain the
fact of the RS that results from hydrogen photon interactions.

If the hydrogen interaction is indeed the cause for the RS the Quasars
will be found far closer to us and to be traveling at less speed than
the BB creationists claim. The universe will then have its mass located
in far smaller regions.

Ralph Hertle
...
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 1:23 pm
Guest
On May 4, 2:57 am, "Robert J. Kolker" <bobkol... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
Quote:
Ralph Hertle wrote:

Mitch:

You fail to consider the functions of atomic and molecular hydrogen in
space with respect to photon interactions and with the result of the
lowering of the energy levels of the photons.

Hydrogen is very sparse in empty space. It is not dense enough to
account for the red shift in the entirety.

The Big Bang has other problems such as accelerated expansion.

For an alternative to the Big Bang see Paul Steinhardt and Niel Turok
-Endless Univeress-.  They have an alternative which which consistent
with all the known facts including recently discovered accelaration of
the expansion of the cosmos.

Bob Kolker

What is the likelyhood for light to encounter hydrogen in empty
intergalactic space? That is the question that needs answering.

Mitch Raemsch
...
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 1:42 pm
Guest
On May 4, 3:23 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem... at (no spam) gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
On May 4, 2:57 am, "Robert J. Kolker" <bobkol... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:





Ralph Hertle wrote:

Mitch:

You fail to consider the functions of atomic and molecular hydrogen in
space with respect to photon interactions and with the result of the
lowering of the energy levels of the photons.

Hydrogen is very sparse in empty space. It is not dense enough to
account for the red shift in the entirety.

The Big Bang has other problems such as accelerated expansion.

For an alternative to the Big Bang see Paul Steinhardt and Niel Turok
-Endless Univeress-.  They have an alternative which which consistent
with all the known facts including recently discovered accelaration of
the expansion of the cosmos.

Bob Kolker

What is the likelyhood for light to encounter hydrogen in empty
intergalactic space? That is the question that needs answering.

Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hydrogen doesn't capture light's energy because the Compton effect
doesn't apply here. That is misleading.

Mitch Raemsch
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:17 am