Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.

Mitch Reamsch

Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.

Mitch Reamsch

Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.

On Apr 21, 4:58 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.

  You have no idea what you're talking about.

  This is about your speed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

  Pay particular attention to the section "Interactions".

  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of many isotopes (frinst C13) depends
entirely on the magnetic moment of an 'extra' neutron.

  Mark L. Fergerson

On Apr 22, 10:14 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 21, 4:58 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:


Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

This is about your speed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

Pay particular attention to the section "Interactions".

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of many isotopes (frinst C13) depends
entirely on the magnetic moment of an 'extra' neutron.


Perhaps that is a misinterpretation as the neutron has no charge.

On Apr 22, 10:14 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 21, 4:58 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

This is about your speed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

Pay particular attention to the section "Interactions".

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of many isotopes (frinst C13) depends
entirely on the magnetic moment of an 'extra' neutron.

Perhaps that is a misinterpretation as the neutron has no charge.

ElectroMagnetic charge is the prerequiset for interacting with light.

MItch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

On Apr 22, 1:56 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:





On Apr 22, 10:14 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 21, 4:58 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.

  You have no idea what you're talking about.

  This is about your speed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

  Pay particular attention to the section "Interactions".

  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of many isotopes (frinst C13) depends
entirely on the magnetic moment of an 'extra' neutron.

Perhaps that is a misinterpretation as the neutron has no charge.

  No.

  Neutrons have an empirically measured magnetic moment, which by
definition means it feels magnetic fields. You apparently didn't
bother to read:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

  where you can find (in the section Interactions):

  "Although the neutron has zero net charge, it may interact
electromagnetically in two ways: first, the neutron has a magnetic
moment of the same order as the proton (see neutron magnetic moment);
second, it is composed of electrically charged quarks."

ElectroMagnetic charge is the prerequiset for interacting with light.

  There is no such thing as "electromagnetic charge" for subatomic
particles.

  Neutrons have nonzero electric polarizability (the ability to
develop externally measurable internal charge displacements in
response to an externally applied electric field) and spin angular
momentum, giving them nonzero magnetic moments. Together those
properties allow neutrons to interact with externally applied
electromagnetic fields.

  And not just time-varying fields, either. When a neutron is placed
in a static (not changing over time) magnetic field its spin angular
momentum vector (spin axis, to you) precesses at a rate proportional
to the field's strength.

MItch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

  You aren't listed here:

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/all_laureates_ln.html

  which covers from 1901 to 2007.

  Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Apr 22, 9:00 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:



On Apr 22, 1:56 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

On Apr 22, 10:14 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 21, 4:58 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

This is about your speed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

Pay particular attention to the section "Interactions".

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of many isotopes (frinst C13) depends
entirely on the magnetic moment of an 'extra' neutron.

Perhaps that is a misinterpretation as the neutron has no charge.

No.

Neutrons have an empirically measured magnetic moment, which by
definition means it feels magnetic fields. You apparently didn't
bother to read:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

where you can find (in the section Interactions):

"Although the neutron has zero net charge, it may interact
electromagnetically in two ways: first, the neutron has a magnetic
moment of the same order as the proton (see neutron magnetic moment);
second, it is composed of electrically charged quarks."

ElectroMagnetic charge is the prerequiset for interacting with light.

There is no such thing as "electromagnetic charge" for subatomic
particles.

Neutrons have nonzero electric polarizability (the ability to
develop externally measurable internal charge displacements in
response to an externally applied electric field) and spin angular
momentum, giving them nonzero magnetic moments. Together those
properties allow neutrons to interact with externally applied
electromagnetic fields.

And not just time-varying fields, either. When a neutron is placed
in a static (not changing over time) magnetic field its spin angular
momentum vector (spin axis, to you) precesses at a rate proportional
to the field's strength.

MItch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

You aren't listed here:

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/all_laureates_ln.html

which covers from 1901 to 2007.

Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I don't believe the neutron is magnetic. That is fudge.

On Apr 22, 10:51 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:





On Apr 22, 9:00 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 22, 1:56 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

On Apr 22, 10:14 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 21, 4:58 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.

  You have no idea what you're talking about.

  This is about your speed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

  Pay particular attention to the section "Interactions".

  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of many isotopes (frinst C13) depends
entirely on the magnetic moment of an 'extra' neutron.

Perhaps that is a misinterpretation as the neutron has no charge.

  No.

  Neutrons have an empirically measured magnetic moment, which by
definition means it feels magnetic fields. You apparently didn't
bother to read:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

  where you can find (in the section Interactions):

  "Although the neutron has zero net charge, it may interact
electromagnetically in two ways: first, the neutron has a magnetic
moment of the same order as the proton (see neutron magnetic moment);
second, it is composed of electrically charged quarks."

ElectroMagnetic charge is the prerequiset for interacting with light..

  There is no such thing as "electromagnetic charge" for subatomic
particles.

  Neutrons have nonzero electric polarizability (the ability to
develop externally measurable internal charge displacements in
response to an externally applied electric field) and spin angular
momentum, giving them nonzero magnetic moments. Together those
properties allow neutrons to interact with externally applied
electromagnetic fields.

  And not just time-varying fields, either. When a neutron is placed
in a static (not changing over time) magnetic field its spin angular
momentum vector (spin axis, to you) precesses at a rate proportional
to the field's strength.

MItch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

  You aren't listed here:

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/all_laureates_ln.html

  which covers from 1901 to 2007.

  Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I don't believe the neutron is magnetic. That is fudge.

  Your beliefs are not in agreement with empirical reality. Please
stop posting them to sci.physics.

  Also, please provide evidence you are "Twice Nobel Laureate 2008";
that is not subject to opinion.

  Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Neutrons are not electromagenic.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

On Apr 22, 10:23 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:



On Apr 22, 10:51 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

On Apr 22, 9:00 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 22, 1:56 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

On Apr 22, 10:14 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 21, 4:58 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:

Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

This is about your speed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

Pay particular attention to the section "Interactions".

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of many isotopes (frinst C13) depends
entirely on the magnetic moment of an 'extra' neutron.

Perhaps that is a misinterpretation as the neutron has no charge.

No.

Neutrons have an empirically measured magnetic moment, which by
definition means it feels magnetic fields. You apparently didn't
bother to read:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

where you can find (in the section Interactions):

"Although the neutron has zero net charge, it may interact
electromagnetically in two ways: first, the neutron has a magnetic
moment of the same order as the proton (see neutron magnetic moment);
second, it is composed of electrically charged quarks."

ElectroMagnetic charge is the prerequiset for interacting with light.

There is no such thing as "electromagnetic charge" for subatomic
particles.

Neutrons have nonzero electric polarizability (the ability to
develop externally measurable internal charge displacements in
response to an externally applied electric field) and spin angular
momentum, giving them nonzero magnetic moments. Together those
properties allow neutrons to interact with externally applied
electromagnetic fields.

And not just time-varying fields, either. When a neutron is placed
in a static (not changing over time) magnetic field its spin angular
momentum vector (spin axis, to you) precesses at a rate proportional
to the field's strength.

MItch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

You aren't listed here:

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/all_laureates_ln.html

which covers from 1901 to 2007.

Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I don't believe the neutron is magnetic. That is fudge.

Your beliefs are not in agreement with empirical reality. Please
stop posting them to sci.physics.

Also, please provide evidence you are "Twice Nobel Laureate 2008";
that is not subject to opinion.

Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Neutrons are not electromagenic.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:27:14 -0700 (PDT),
mitch.nicolas.raemsch@gmail.com wrote:



Neutrons are not electromagenic.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008


I agree with Mitch Raemsch.
Neutrons are not electromagenic.

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:27:14 -0700 (PDT),
mitch.nicolas.raemsch@gmail.com wrote:


Neutrons are not electromagenic.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

I agree with Mitch Raemsch.
Neutrons are not electromagenic.