Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Math - Symbolic Forum  »  A letter from a Professor
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Mehran Basti
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:30 pm
Guest
Dear Newsgroup:

I have received an email by someone who is a professor at a well-known university, I cannot reveal his name.

This is his letter.


Mehran:
Your message is incoherent. Please seek psychiatric help.
Continuing to post such messages will only get you further abuse.
Is there anyone you trust near you who can take you to an emergency room for evaluation? Emergency rooms must treat you
Even if you cannot pay.

Just tell them that Einstein was wrong and you have the key to the
Universe, but no one believes you.”

A type of answer I gave him is this:

Well, This is a new trick. You and your colleagues have blocked the natural developments of my new math for decades, now you have been cornered and do not have any avenue to play your game, thus playing such a nonsense trick.

If you want to contradict my formula, you need to initiate studying it for many years to understand its dynamics.

It is a universe of its own.

That professor then answered back:


I have absolutely no interest in tricking you.

You can continue to post messages, since no one can stop you.

I will try to reason with you once more, but then you are on your own.


You will not convince anyone of anything, nor will anyone read the large files and printouts you have posted.

Why? You are either mentally unbalanced, or you have managed to figure out how to make postings on newsgroups so that you appear to be mentally unbalanced.

I don't care which it is, but if you are sincerely trying to post what you think are important Messages, you need care.

There are perhaps simple treatments, like lithium, that really help some people.”

Until the math community is freed from the hands of a few, obviously we will have problems disseminating my science.

I assure you that; I will not accept the status of the math establishment, since I am totally independent.

It is better you and your colleagues stop the power struggle and start understanding this new science.

The cause of the problems is illegal control of a few over academia.

Dr.M.Basti
Mehran Basti
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:36 pm
Guest
Dear Newsgroup:

Looks like that professor has been paranoid and shaking.

Even somehow threatening me!

They are no doubt in position of power, but I have to continue my position as usual without them (I hope).

Dr.M.Basti
Mehran Basti
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:17 pm
Guest
Dear Newsgroup:

If you look at one of my files you can see that I have compared my math with those of Newton and Descartes.

Well, this is what I feel about the new universe of computations for over 25 years.

You think that never someone like them might come again!

If you get to know this new world of math, you will agree with me that, I am right.

So, the key to questions is to start supporting my science.

I believe that, I am at the rank of the past masters (and I do not have any reasons to believe otherwise), and then it is natural to question someone like Einstein.

Well, it was a question naturally surfaced on back of my mind and I needed to communicate, realizing it is difficult to many comprehend the situation.

But unfortunately, sooner or later, we need to face hard scientific questions, whether we like it or not.

So, start communicating with my math, rather than other nonsense issues (I will never allow them to play games with me in the academia).

Dr.M.Basti
Mehran Basti
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:58 pm
Guest
Dear Newsgroup:

Since the last two decades, I have already learned what are the tricks and physiological games my enemies would play, in order to keep their positions intact.

But I have made it clear that; I will not be part of them.

Sooner or later, they will realize this real fact.

Unlike them, I am not a conventional mathematician nor I am part of their establishment in anyway. Simply, I do not recognize their value judgments (in math societies).

I am a true scholar, and always have been.

By the way, I have a key mathematical formula of the universe (YES), and from mathematics, we can learn a lot about the physical world, despite the fact that I am not a physicist.

So, put your psychological games in your backyard, it will not affect me in anyway what so ever.

Dr.M.Basti
Mehran Basti
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:27 pm
Guest
Dear Newsgroup:

I looked at the internet for Lithium:
"
Lithium affects the flow of sodium through nerve and muscle cells in the body. Sodium affects excitation or mania.

Lithium is used to treat the manic episodes of manic depression. Manic symptoms include hyperactivity, rushed speech, poor judgment, reduced need for sleep, aggression, and anger. Lithium also helps to prevent or lessen the intensity of manic episodes.

Lithium may also be used for purposes other than those listed in this medication guide."

I am perfectly fine.

I believe many of our leaders in the math community, including the professor who wrote the letter, should take Lithium.

They are the ones created a mess in the math community and should think about their poor judgment in academia, as well as ignoring the new developments of mathematics.

If they do not learn about the history, certainly history will repeat itself and teach them a hard lessons.

Dr.M.Basti
none
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:58 pm
Guest
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:30:09 -0400, Mehran Basti wrote:

Quote:
Dear Newsgroup:

I have received an email by someone who is a professor at a well-known university, I cannot reveal his name.

This is his letter.


Mehran:
Your message is incoherent. Please seek psychiatric help.
Continuing to post such messages will only get you further abuse.
Is there anyone you trust near you who can take you to an emergency room for evaluation? Emergency rooms must treat you
Even if you cannot pay.

Just tell them that Einstein was wrong and you have the key to the
Universe, but no one believes you.”

A type of answer I gave him is this:

Well, This is a new trick. You and your colleagues have blocked the natural developments of my new math for decades, now you have been cornered and do not have any avenue to play your game, thus playing such a nonsense trick.

If you want to contradict my formula, you need to initiate studying it for many years to understand its dynamics.

I have two problems with this reply.

1. You clearly assume that there is no need to debate your work as it
would need many years study to understand it. If this is truly the case
then it is clear that your work is unclear and ill-formulated.

2. From the one posting I have seen you have not published your work -
just a one-line equation that meant nothing, dominated by pretty graphics.
That approach is great for content-free material, but not for mathematics.
My background is engineering, so I appreciate that I would struggle to
understand your proofs (if you had any, and they were truly as advanced as
you claim) - but since you don't have any, I had no struggle whatsoever.

Quote:

It is a universe of its own.

That professor then answered back:


I have absolutely no interest in tricking you.

You can continue to post messages, since no one can stop you.

I will try to reason with you once more, but then you are on your own.


You will not convince anyone of anything, nor will anyone read the large
files and printouts you have posted.

Why? You are either mentally unbalanced, or you have managed to figure
out how to make postings on newsgroups so that you appear to be mentally
unbalanced.

I don't care which it is, but if you are sincerely trying to post what
you think are important Messages, you need care.

There are perhaps simple treatments, like lithium, that really help some
people.”

Until the math community is freed from the hands of a few, obviously we
will have problems disseminating my science.


This demonstrates the truth of what you are being told. Nobody is stopping
you from disseminating your work - which, I believe, is in the realms of
maths, not science. You *can* choose to publish your work as a PDF or
other suitable format in alt.binaries.e-book.technical. You *can* post
them on a website & give us links. I have only followed one link, as I
wrote above, which was to a small, content-free, file. Science is not in
the hands of a few, if it ever was; academic funding opportunities may be
in the hands of a 'few', but since you have *made your discovery* funding
does not stop your dissemination. Sadly, you do not seem to disseminate
*your work*, only your *claims* of your work.

*If* your claims are true, *and* you really have your maths, then you
will find that there *will be* venture capitalists willing to fund you, &
exploit your work. You *will* get rich - if you have the proof that your
work does what it claims - without the need to proclaim to us all how you
are being held back. What is holding you back from getting funding are two
issues:

1. Do you really want the grind of seeking out funding?
2. If yes, do you have the prof to ensure that you will get that funding?

From what I have seen you fall down on both issues. You do not want to
seek out funding; you expect that it will be offered to you, with no
support from yourself that you can deliver on your claims. And when you do
post 'proof' it lacks all substance.

Your last posting to which I replied was your preposterous claim that if
you wrote to a university stating that you were not applying for a job
they would refuse to interview you because they wished to hold back your
'science.' You seemed unable to comprehend that if you ask not to be
employed people will take you seriously - and because they take you
seriously you then then complain that they are not taking you seriously.
Assuming that your letter from an unamed professor came about through your
application I would suggest that you have been given more attention, and
better advice, than you deserve, and you should recognise that the
professor you have chosen to attack actually has concern for both your
personal and intellectual well-being.


Quote:
I assure you that; I will not accept the status of the math
establishment, since I am totally independent.


In which case you do not need to complain about funding. Perhaps it is
time for you to start on a long period of research in the field of logic.

Quote:
It is better you and your colleagues stop the power struggle and start
understanding this new science.


The truly great need fear nought, for to them is the future.

Quote:
The cause of the problems is illegal control of a few over academia.


If you can prove that here is indeed illegal - and I assume therefore
criminal - control over academia then take the proof to the police or the
press. Both will have an interest in eradicating illegal/criminal
behaviour. If, however, you are exaggerating (as, I am sure,
you been told a million times not to do) then you will appreciate both the
unwise nature of taking such action, and the irritation that such claims
can cause in a forum like this.

Quote:
Dr.M.Basti

Dr. J Dudley
Guest
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:47 pm
Mehran Basti wrote:

Quote:
This is his letter.

.

I will try to reason with you once more, but then you are on your own.

What does that mean? Is he threatening me?

I have been always on my own. Or he is saying he will block all my
avenues in every direction? he and his gangs have already done it.




Quote:

You will not convince anyone of anything, nor will anyone read the large files and printouts you have posted.

Obviously they have managed to illegally get control of the academia.
So, it is not the way they say publicly, it is its reverse.

This means the natural functions of science has been corrupted in such
a way that the academia cannot dare to raise any scientific questions
as they intend to do (as well as pursue the unconventional fields),
since the professor and his gangs will not allow them.

This is an anti-science atmosphere in the math community.

Dr.M.Basti
Guest
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:32 pm
Mehran Basti wrote:

Quote:
This is his letter.


Quote:
but if you are sincerely trying to post what you think are important Messages.....

I have no doubt that the leaders in the math community have only one

thing in mind, that is their leadership.

But fields are depreciated for decades and new filled like mine are
emerging.

They are certainly afraid that they lose the control of leadership to
others (possibly they do not see themselves competent in emerging
fields).

Once I had mentioned and demonstrated many times that a group of
polynomials are based, as a class in a Riccati, he and his gangs
cannot stop it.

I have explained what I have and they have completely blocked it.

Let me clear once more one fact. I do not recognize current leaders in
the math community (i.e. their status).

Thus do not play game with me and I will find means of opening this
dynamic mathematics to the public without their cooperation (2000
pages and a software after copyright).

Dr.M.Basti
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Oct 14, 2008 5:56 am