Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Mathematics Forum  »  -- spam, news sources, and Goosle groups
Page 1 of 9    Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
William Elliot
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:33 am
Guest
Comments, additions and corrections are welcome.

NNTP news servers
Most ISP include a news server with the account
http://www.teranews.com (one time $3.95 set up cost, worth it)

News Readers
SeaMonkey
Forte Agent (excellent, inexpensive)
Thunderbird (in developement)
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird
Gnus (for emacs)
for Mac Users: MT-Newswatcher, hogwash, thoth (not supported)

News souces, web and otherwise and references to news sites
http://www.readfreenews.net
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_news_clients
http://dmoz.org/Computers/Usenet/Public_News_Servers
http://www.alt.free.newsservers.net
http://freenews.maxbaud.net

NewsProxy (proxy news source, may be complicated)
http://bearware.info/NewsProxy/newsproxy.html

commercial news servers
Giganews http://www.giganews.com ($8/month, worth it)
Supernews http://www.supernews.com
Newsfeeds http://www.newsfeeds.com
Usenetserve http://www.usenetserver.com
Easynews http://www.easynews.com
Altopia https://www.altopia.com
Newsguy https://www.newsguy.com

--
Google groups is the source of the vast majority of spam that is on
Usenet. For that reason, and that it's also a major source of the
gibberings of idiots on Usenet, a growing number of people are now
blocking all posts from Google groups.

http://www.improve-usenet.org/index.html

-- Essential features for a quality news reader.

(1) Correct referencing the prior messages in the thread.

(2) Correct quoting.

(3) Ascii-only posting.

(4) Elimination of Google's hide quoted / show quoted nonsense.

(5) No ads, cookies, etc.

(6) Spell checking option for outgoing messages.

(7) Sophisticated filter capability to allow pruning of incoming messages.

(Cool Offline newsreading. Messages could be downloaded and read offline
at a later time. The local database of messages (on the user's
machine) would be searchable and categorizable based on user defined
categories.

----
Noob
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:46 am
Guest
William Elliot wrote:

Quote:
Comments, additions and corrections are welcome.

The string "DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE" is a signature delimiter.

It appears before the paragraph "Google groups is the source [...]"
which causes Mozilla-based clients to display the rest of the text in
light gray, which is hard to read.
Michael Press
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:06 pm
Guest
In article <47fe0c10$0$15298$426a74cc@news.free.fr>,
Noob <root@localhost> wrote:

Quote:
William Elliot wrote:

Comments, additions and corrections are welcome.

The string "DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE" is a signature delimiter.

It appears before the paragraph "Google groups is the source [...]"
which causes Mozilla-based clients to display the rest of the text in
light gray, which is hard to read.

Why is it always specified so?
Oughtn't it be the following?

"NEWLINE DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE"

--
Michael Press
Jesse F. Hughes
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:20 pm
Guest
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> writes:

Quote:
In article <47fe0c10$0$15298$426a74cc@news.free.fr>,
Noob <root@localhost> wrote:

William Elliot wrote:

Comments, additions and corrections are welcome.

The string "DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE" is a signature delimiter.

It appears before the paragraph "Google groups is the source [...]"
which causes Mozilla-based clients to display the rest of the text in
light gray, which is hard to read.

Why is it always specified so?
Oughtn't it be the following?

"NEWLINE DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE"

In either case, the post he responded too has the string "NEWLINE DASH
DASH SPACE NEWLINE".

--
Jesse F. Hughes
"I think the problem for some of you is that you think you are very
smart. I AM very smart. I am smarter on a scale you cannot really
comprehend and there is the problem." -- James S. Harris
William Elliot
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:22 am
Guest
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Noob wrote:

Quote:
William Elliot wrote:

Comments, additions and corrections are welcome.

The string "DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE" is a signature delimiter.

It appears before the paragraph "Google groups is the source [...]"
which causes Mozilla-based clients to display the rest of the text in
light gray, which is hard to read.

Same answer, block all posts from Google groups.

Post notice once a week that more are more people are joining
the Google groups boycott and some suggestions how to avoid
the boycott by using a different news server.

I hate color for text and have set my system
to black and white text. I also try to rid my self
of attributes which is only needed for the cursor.

In other words, all this wonderfully unneeded extra capacity, doesn't make
our lives easier, it makes our lives more annoying. Remember the good old
days before automation and you didn't have to put up with voice activated
menus, the first lousy application of AI, Artificial Idiocy?
Noob
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:00 am
Guest
William Elliot wrote:

Quote:
Noob wrote:

William Elliot wrote:

Comments, additions and corrections are welcome.

The string "DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE" is a signature delimiter.

It appears before the paragraph "Google groups is the source [...]"
which causes Mozilla-based clients to display the rest of the text in
light gray, which is hard to read.

Same answer, block all posts from Google groups.

Err... What?

I was merely suggesting, as an improvement to your post, that
you change the string "DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE" to, say,
"DASH DASH NEWLINE" (which is visually similar).

I think we agree that Google are not following their
"do no evil" motto.
James Waldby
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:22 am
Guest
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:00:11 +0200, Noob wrote:
Quote:
William Elliot wrote:
Noob wrote:
William Elliot wrote:
....
The string "DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE" is a signature delimiter.

It appears before the paragraph "Google groups is the source [...]"
which causes Mozilla-based clients to display the rest of the text in
light gray, which is hard to read.
....
I was merely suggesting, as an improvement to your post, that you change
the string "DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE" to, say, "DASH DASH NEWLINE" (which
is visually similar).

Refer to section 4.3 of RFC 2646 or RFC 3676, Usenet Signature
Convention, where it shows "-- " as the separator line between
the body and the signature of a message. Usenet message format
standards call for a space after the dashes in the signature
delimiter line so that posting software can recognize the signature
block and treat it differently; for example, automatically not
quoting it in replies. Leaving out the space is an error rather
than an improvement.

-jiw
Aatu Koskensilta
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:27 am
Guest
On 2008-04-11, in sci.math, James Waldby wrote:
Quote:
Refer to section 4.3 of RFC 2646 or RFC 3676, Usenet Signature
Convention, where it shows "-- " as the separator line between
the body and the signature of a message.

Indeed. But William did not use "-- " as a separator between the body
and his signature, rather, he used it to separate sections within the
body; hence the suggestion that he does not.

--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xortec.fi)

"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
David Bernier
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:56 am
Guest
Noob wrote:
Quote:
William Elliot wrote:

Noob wrote:

William Elliot wrote:

Comments, additions and corrections are welcome.

The string "DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE" is a signature delimiter.

It appears before the paragraph "Google groups is the source [...]"
which causes Mozilla-based clients to display the rest of the text in
light gray, which is hard to read.

Same answer, block all posts from Google groups.

Err... What?

I was merely suggesting, as an improvement to your post, that
you change the string "DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE" to, say,
"DASH DASH NEWLINE" (which is visually similar).

I think we agree that Google are not following their
"do no evil" motto.

There's a newsgroup for discussing Usenet abuse:
< news.admin.net-abuse.usenet > .

Its charter can be found here:
< http://www.killfile.org/~tskirvin/nana/charter/nanau.html > .

I recently read about the Usenet Death Penalty (or UDP) in the Wikipedia
article:
< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_Death_Penalty > .

In January 2000, ISP @Home got a UDP notice:
<
http://groups.google.com.au/group/news.admin.net-abuse.bulletins/msg/b9e534da452e7bc5
Quote:
.

Actually, before the UDP came into effect, @Home asked for an extension
and cracked
down on spammers. The planned UDP sanction was soon lifted.

David Bernier
Guest
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:59 pm
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:33:49 -0700, William Elliot
<marsh@hevanet.remove.com> wrote:

Quote:
Comments, additions and corrections are welcome.

NNTP news servers
Most ISP include a news server with the account
http://www.teranews.com (one time $3.95 set up cost, worth it)

News Readers
SeaMonkey
Forte Agent (excellent, inexpensive)
Thunderbird (in developement)
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird
Gnus (for emacs)
for Mac Users: MT-Newswatcher, hogwash, thoth (not supported)

News souces, web and otherwise and references to news sites
http://www.readfreenews.net
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_news_clients
http://dmoz.org/Computers/Usenet/Public_News_Servers
http://www.alt.free.newsservers.net
http://freenews.maxbaud.net

NewsProxy (proxy news source, may be complicated)
http://bearware.info/NewsProxy/newsproxy.html

commercial news servers
Giganews http://www.giganews.com ($8/month, worth it)
Supernews http://www.supernews.com
Newsfeeds http://www.newsfeeds.com
Usenetserve http://www.usenetserver.com
Easynews http://www.easynews.com
Altopia https://www.altopia.com
Newsguy https://www.newsguy.com

Thanks for that, particularly the bearware link, which I hadn't
seen before. I'm on the point of installing newsproxy to filter out
googlegroup posts. I take it exemptions are compatible with a blanket
googlegroups exclusion. Assuming that, I was wondering if anybody would
volunteer a list of genuine regular posters to sci.math using google
groups. It probably seems like asking someone to do my work for me, but as
more of an occasional than thorough reader it would probably take me some
time to do.

Thanks, leon
David Bernier
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 5:54 pm
Guest
William Elliot wrote:
Quote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Noob wrote:

William Elliot wrote:

Comments, additions and corrections are welcome.
The string "DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE" is a signature delimiter.

It appears before the paragraph "Google groups is the source [...]"
which causes Mozilla-based clients to display the rest of the text in
light gray, which is hard to read.

Same answer, block all posts from Google groups.
Post notice once a week that more are more people are joining
the Google groups boycott and some suggestions how to avoid
the boycott by using a different news server.

I hate color for text and have set my system
to black and white text. I also try to rid my self
of attributes which is only needed for the cursor.

In other words, all this wonderfully unneeded extra capacity, doesn't make
our lives easier, it makes our lives more annoying. Remember the good old
days before automation and you didn't have to put up with voice activated
menus, the first lousy application of AI, Artificial Idiocy?


Google has many blogs about all things Google. They have branched out from
web search to Google earth and then Google the moon...

Anyway, I found a Google blog about Online Security, where in a post
from less than a
year ago they mentioned their CAPTCHA system :
< http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/ > .

I read a few posts there by Niels Provos, a math./stats. PhD in the
Google Anti-Malware Team .

From Google's point of view, I'd think the Google Groups system is just one
of many things to work on, and maybe not the most interesting. After all,
Usenet existed before Google, and obviously could very well exist
without it.

I guess I'll be checking the Google blogs from time to time since I
found a few
interesting things.

David Bernier
David R Tribble
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:36 pm
Guest
William Elliot wrote:
Quote:
offer
opportunity for readers to request that they individually not be blocked.
What I have upon the say so of others is.

Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com
jankrihau@hotmail.com
Derek Holt <mareg@warwick.ac.uk
israel@math.ubc.ca
Randy Poe <poespam-trap@yahoo.com

If you find others, let me know.


Me: David R Tribble, david@tribble.com,
usually posting via Google groups, and probably will be
for quite a while.
William Elliot
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:57 pm
Guest
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, it was written:


Quote:
Thanks for that, particularly the bearware link, which I hadn't
seen before. I'm on the point of installing newsproxy to filter out
googlegroup posts. I take it exemptions are compatible with a blanket
googlegroups exclusion. Assuming that, I was wondering if anybody would
volunteer a list of genuine regular posters to sci.math using google
groups. It probably seems like asking someone to do my work for me, but as
more of an occasional than thorough reader it would probably take me some
time to do.

Other than playing the game of ever changing key spam words, like 'nude',

'paypal', etc, which I'm doing because of time limitatons filtering out
all Google groups posts, you can mark all the Google group posts and in
that way find the significant Google group posters. After that, then the
full block can occure. I suggest you post notice that you too are about
to join the Google groups blocade boycott and before you do, offer
opportunity for readers to request that they individually not be blocked.
What I have upon the say so of others is.

Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com>
jankrihau@hotmail.com
Derek Holt <mareg@warwick.ac.uk>
israel@math.ubc.ca
Randy Poe <poespam-trap@yahoo.com>

If you find others, let me know.

----
William Elliot
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:39 am
Guest
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, David Bernier wrote:

Quote:
There's a newsgroup for discussing Usenet abuse:
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet > .

Its charter can be found here:
http://www.killfile.org/~tskirvin/nana/charter/nanau.html > .

I recently read about the Usenet Death Penalty (or UDP) in the Wikipedia
article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_Death_Penalty > .

In January 2000, ISP @Home got a UDP notice:

http://groups.google.com.au/group/news.admin.net-abuse.bulletins/msg/b9e534da452e7bc5
.

Actually, before the UDP came into effect, @Home asked for an extension
and cracked down on spammers. The planned UDP sanction was soon lifted.

Time Google Groups get's a UDP.

When is it going to happen?
Who can get it to happen?
William Elliot
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:49 am
Guest
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, David R Tribble wrote:

Quote:
Me: David R Tribble, david@tribble.com,
usually posting via Google groups, and probably will be
for quite a while.

Ok, I've added you to the list.
 
Page 1 of 9    Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:12 am