| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Physics - Particle Forum » "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Nev |
 Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:55 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Communicating at Translight Velocities"
In the 19th century, science had concluded that reality was based upon
the Aether, a rigid medium that pervaded all of space. The Aether was
required to account for the ability of forces (electric, magnetic,
gravitational, etc.) to "act at distance" and through which the vibrational
disturbance known as light could propagate. Late in the century, the next
obvious step was taken. Attempts were made to measure our velocity through
the Aether. The most notable of those attempts was the Michaelson-Morley
experiment which, to everyone's chagrin, produced a null result.
The difficulty was first resolved in 1903 with conclusions by
Fitzgerald and Larmor. Fitzgerald concluded that what was happening was that
lengths became shorter in the direction of the velocity vector and Larmor
concluded that, if this were true, clocks must slow by a reciprocal amount.
The result was the Lorentz Transformation Aether Theory, which, in
conjunction with the fact that the velocity of light represented the most
rapid means of transferring information, insured that our absolute velocity
through space could not be measured. In 1905, Dr. Einstein showed that the
theory could be derived from fundamental principles and Special Relativity
was off and running. When examined objectively, both theories are found to
be identical (cross-derivable), and differ only in philosophical viewpoint.
One viewpoint asserted that the classical Aether exists but because of
the Lorentz Transformations and the limit on the transfer of information
imposed by the velocity of light, we could not, in principle, measure our
velocity with respect to it. The other viewpoint asserted that, because our
velocity with respect to the Aether could not be measured, it was not valid
to include the Aether in physical theory. This interpretation required that
all velocity reference frames were equally valid and reality did not consist
of space and time as separate entities but was a single entity which was
named space-time.
The mathematics of space-time work as long as they are not abused by
arbitrarily jumping from one velocity reference to another in the same
problem, but science was still left with the problem of explaining "action
at a distance". This difficulty was overcome by the addition of the concept
of "virtual exchange particles" (photons, gluons, gravitons, etc.) whose
existence was of such short duration that the laws of quantum mechanics
allowed them to "pop into and out of existence" without violating the Law of
Conservation of Energy and which acted to exchange momentum (force) between
physically separated entities.
The elimination of the Aether from realm of acceptable physical theory
did not result from observations or the application of rigorous logic. It
was eliminated instead by a consensus opinion upon the part of the
scientific community. Since the Lorentz Contraction-Aether Theory is a
special case solution of the Special Theory of Relativity, the existence of
the classical Aether cannot be disproved without also disproving Special
Relativity. The existence of the Aether can be verified, however, if
information can be transferred between physically separated locations at a
velocity that exceeds the velocity of light! If that can be accomplished,
all that is necessary to determine our "absolute velocity" through space is
to compare the synchronization of clocks set by the hyperluminal information
transfer method with the synchronization of clocks set by electromagnetic
means. The difference in their "now" readings would allow their "absolute
velocity" to be measured and the establishment of our absolute velocity
through space (i.e.- the Aether) by direct observation, exactly as
Michaelson and Morley wished to do.
In the 1980's experiments were performed which showed that the quantum
coupling of the polarization of "paired photons" could be observed as
propagating at a velocity at least 4 times the velocity of light (and
perhaps at an infinite velocity). IT MUST BE RECOGNIZED THAT, SINCE CHANGING
THE POLARIZATION OF A PHOTON DOES NOT CHANGE ITS ENERGY, TRANSFERING
INFORMATION THROUGH THE POLARIZATION COUPLING OF PHOTONS REPRESENTS A
TRANSFER OF INFORMATION WIHTOUT ANY TRANSFER OF ENERGY. Since transfer of
energy is not involved, the limitation on the velocity of transfer of
information which is encoded by energy which is imposed by the Lorentz
Transformations does not apply. Since energy is not part of the information
encoding there is no theoretical restriction currently known which limits
the velocity of transfer of information encoded as a quantum number. The
paired photons travel at the velocity of light, but their polarization
coupling, in principle, can travel at any velocity up to infinity. This is
consistent with one of the two interpretations of quantum theory (considered
"spooky" by Dr. Einstein) in which quantum effects propagate thoughout space
at infinite velocity. (The other interpretation is that at every instant of
time, every quantum event in the Universe produces a parallel Universe that
occupies the same space as our own and contains as much energy. Such an
interpretation requires the continuous input of energy to the Universe at a
virtually infinite rate and requires that a virtually infinite number of
particles occupy the same space at the same time. The writer is old
fashioned enough to accept that energy cannot be created or destroyed and
that two objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time and therefore
rejects such a concept as foolish.)
The reason that it has been impossible to transfer information at
translight velocities is that we have always attempted to encode the
information in the form of energy. Consider the Lorentz Transformations as
expressed in a Force-Length-Time system of units:
Force = 1
Length = 1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5
Time = (1-V^2/C^2)^0.5
In this system, the Lorentz Transformation for Energy (Force times
Length) is equal to the Lorentz Transformation for length and becomes
infinite at the velocity of light and imaginary at velocities higher than
the velocity of light. The situation is different if we consider the
transformation of information by the coupling of the polarization angle of
paired photons. Since angles are measured in radians, which is the length
along an arc divided by the radius of the arc, the Lorentz Transformation
for Angle is equal to the Lorentz Transformation for Length divided by the
Lorentz Transformations for Length and is equal to unity, as is the Lorentz
Transformation for Force. One might conclude from these transformations that
not only is the velocity of polarization coupling not limited to the
velocity of light, it should be INFINITE. If this is the case the "spooky"
interpretation of quantum theory is not spooky after all, it represents
reality. It is the "Parallel Universe" concept which is incorrect.
The diagram of the original experimental setup is shown in the diagram
below. The experimenters attempted to use a modification of this
experimental setup to transmit information at velocities greater than
lightspeed. In this effort they were unsuccessful. The information
that was received consisted of random noise. It is reported that later
attempts were made using laser amplifiers to greatly increase the signal to
noise ratio of the signal. That effort was also unsuccessful and it was
concluded that Nature conspired to interfere with the transmission of
information at translight velocities. See http://einsteinhoax.com/cf51.gif.
The transmission of information at translight velocities was
foredoomed, regardless of any conspiracy of Nature to prevent translight
communication. It had to fail because the experimenters were violating the
basic requirements of a communication system. The paired
photons, as emitted, were randomly phased and the phasing of those photons
was then modulated to represent the information. What the experimenters were
attempting to do was to phase modulate a randomly phased carrier. At the
receiving end of such a system, the information is present but it is
indecipherable because its phase has also been modulated by the randomly
phased carrier noise and is therefore appears as random noise.
Assuming that the polarization coupling of paired photons is not
destroyed by passing though a polarized, this limitation can be overcome by
eliminating the random phasing of the paired photons at their source using
additional polarizers set at an angle of 45 degrees to the transmitting and
receiving polarizer's axes as shown in diagram below. (There does not seem
to be any reason why it would be detrimental to insert laser amplifiers
between the paired photon sources to improve signal to noise ratio, assuming
that the laser amplifiers repeat the photon phasing.) With this
modification, the detectable peak to peak signal, as received, would be
expected to have an amplitude of 50% of the amplitude of the original paired
photons (ideal case assuming no losses). AT THIS POINT, ASSUMING THAT
PASSING THROUGH A POLARIZER DOES NOT DESTROY THE POLARIZATION COUPLING, THE
FEASIBILIY OF ACHIEVING TRANSLIGHT COMMUNICATION CEASEs TO RELY ON PHYSICS,
IT HAS BECOME A STRAIGHTFORWARD ENGINEERING PROBLEM WHOSE SUCCESS IS ONE CAN
PREDICT WITH CONFIDENCE. Assuming the original experiment described in the
figure above worked as reported, translight communication will be
demonstrated. (A recent program of NOVA on PBS showed an experiment in which
music was transmitted at a modest translight velocity. Since this feat has
been achieved, it should only be a matter of time before it is used to
establish our absolute velocity through space. If successfully made, such an
observation of "absolute velocity" would throw the currently accepted idea
of space-time into a cocked hat (where it undoubtedly belongs since it is
based upon a consensus opinion and not provable fact) and return science to
the idea of the classical Aether. (See http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm and
http://einsteinhoax.com/cf53.gif).
A recent posting has brought a question to the writer's attention. It
was asserted that passing the paired photon's through the 45 degree
polarizers, as suggested, would destroy the coupling between them. Searching
through the material available to the writer provides no firm answer to this
possibility. All is not lost, however, if the crossed polarizers detroy the
polarization coupling, they may be eliminated. The detectors at the left
side of the diagram will still detect information propagated at the velocity
of the polarization coupling and probably at a better signal to noise ratio.
(Doubters will please note that, in contrast to what many may believe and in
agreement with the last paragraph of this posting, the writer does excercise
care in making sure that his writings represent valid science.)
This limitation can be overcome by eliminating the random phasing of
the paired photons at their source using additional polarizers set at an
angle of 45 degrees to the transmitting and receiving polarizer's axes as
shown in diagram above. (There does not seem to be any reason why it would
be detrimental to insert laser amplifiers between the paired photon source
to improve signal to noise ratio.) With this modification, the detectable
peak to peak signal, as received, would be expected to have an amplitude of
50% of the amplitude of the original paired photons (ideal case assuming no
losses). AT THIS POINT, THE FEASIBILIY OF ACHIEVING TRANSLIGHT COMMUNICATION
HAS CEASED TO RELY ON PHYSICS, IT HAS BECOME A STRAIGHTFORWARD ENGINEERING
PROBLEM WHOSE SUCCESS IS ONE CAN PREDICT WITH CONFIDENCE. Assuming the
original experiment described in the top figure as reported, translight
communication will be demonstrated. (A recent program of NOVA on PBS showed
an experiment in which music was transmitted at a modest translight
velocity. Since this feat has been achieved, it should only be a matter of
time before it is used to establish our absolute velocity through space. If
successfully made, such an observation
of "absolute velocity" would throw the currently accepted idea of space-time
into a cocked hat (where it undoubtedly belongs since it is based upon a
consensus opinion and not provable fact) and return science to the idea of
the classical Aether. (The text associated with these diagrams can be
accessed at http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm.
A recent posting has brought a question to the writer's attention. It
was asserted that passing the paired photon's through the 45 degree
polarizers, as suggested, would destroy the coupling between them. Searching
through the material available to the writer provides no firm answer to this
possibility. All is not lost, however, if the crossed polarizers detroy the
polarization coupling, they may be eliminated. The detectors at the left
side of the diagram will still detect information propagated at the velocity
of the polarization coupling and probably at a better signal to noise ratio.
(Doubters will please note that, in contrast to what many may believe and in
agreement with the last paragraph of this posting, the writer does excercise
care in making sure that his writings represent valid science.)
Remember that Dr. Einstein warned "we have not proven that the Aether
doesn't exist, we have merely proven we do not need it (for calculations).
Also remember that it took 25 years of peer pressure to cause Dr. Einstein
to relinquish the idea of "absolute time" (equivalent to believing the
Aether) and accepting the unproven consensus viewpoint of space-time as a
single entity.
The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.
Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:22 pm
|
|