|
Science Forum Index » Research Forum » PCT/IB2006/053194
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| sirinath |
 Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:35 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hi,
I have filed for a patent (http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?
wo=2007039837) which I want to commercialize. There are some legal
issues with the claims as in the published. I have amended them to
overcome these problems. I am looking for VC to start a company to
produce this or even license it. Please help me on this matter.
Best regards, Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| sirinath |
| Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:39 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Publication Number: WO/2007/039837
International Application No.: PCT/IB2006/053194
Publication Date: 12.04.2007
International Filing Date: 10.09.2006
more details are available at: http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2007039837
including my address and contact details.
Best regards, Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| mk |
| Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:39:33 -0800 (PST), sirinath
<sirinath1978m@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: Publication Number: WO/2007/039837
International Application No.: PCT/IB2006/053194
Publication Date: 12.04.2007
International Filing Date: 10.09.2006
more details are available at: http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2007039837
including my address and contact details.
Best regards, Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena
The abstract says: "Implementation of a processor using and [sic]
implied set of..." which is where I stopped reading. I don't think
that "and" belongs there. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Wilco Dijkstra |
| Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:22 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"sirinath" <sirinath1978m@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:39028072-f554-4249-a83f-7fce55ad9fd7@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
You've got a bit more than "some legal issues" here. There is a lot of precedent
for this kind of move-based architectures, search for "The WIZ processor" for
example, and you'll find loads of prior art that predates your patent's priority date.
There was a big thread on it here in comp.arch in 2004, which included all the
reasons why this kind of architecture can never be competitive.
So if you want to get any kind of funding you'll have to prove your invention works
and design the instruction set, a processor and an assembler/compiler for it.
If you do this you'll find that many of the advantages claimed are disadvantages...
Wilco |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Regis |
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Dec 17, 2:22 pm, "Wilco Dijkstra" <Wilco_dot_Dijks...@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
Quote: "sirinath" <sirinath19...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:39028072-f554-4249-a83f-7fce55ad9fd7@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Publication Number: WO/2007/039837
International Application No.: PCT/IB2006/053194
Publication Date: 12.04.2007
International Filing Date: 10.09.2006
more details are available at:http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2007039837
You've got a bit more than "some legal issues" here. There is a lot of precedent
for this kind of move-based architectures, search for "The WIZ processor" for
example, and you'll find loads of prior art that predates your patent's priority date.
There was a big thread on it here in comp.arch in 2004, which included all the
reasons why this kind of architecture can never be competitive.
So if you want to get any kind of funding you'll have to prove your invention works
and design the instruction set, a processor and an assembler/compiler for it.
If you do this you'll find that many of the advantages claimed are disadvantages...
Wilco
As Wilco said, the international search report produced by the EPO
(4th of june 2007) shows novelty destroying prior art and lack of
inventive step... So you are unlikely to get a patent with the current
set of claims... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| sirinath |
| Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 11:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Dec 19, 1:43 pm, Regis <quela...@netscape.net> wrote:
Quote: On Dec 17, 2:22 pm, "Wilco Dijkstra" <Wilco_dot_Dijks...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
"sirinath" <sirinath19...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:39028072-f554-4249-a83f-7fce55ad9fd7@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Publication Number: WO/2007/039837
International Application No.: PCT/IB2006/053194
Publication Date: 12.04.2007
International Filing Date: 10.09.2006
more details are available at:http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2007039837
You've got a bit more than "some legal issues" here. There is a lot of precedent
for this kind of move-based architectures, search for "The WIZ processor" for
example, and you'll find loads of prior art that predates your patent's priority date.
There was a big thread on it here in comp.arch in 2004, which included all the
reasons why this kind of architecture can never be competitive.
So if you want to get any kind of funding you'll have to prove your invention works
and design the instruction set, a processor and an assembler/compiler for it.
If you do this you'll find that many of the advantages claimed are disadvantages...
Wilco
As Wilco said, the international search report produced by the EPO
(4th of june 2007) shows novelty destroying prior art and lack of
inventive step... So you are unlikely to get a patent with the current
set of claims...
Hi,
I have changed the claim to avoid some of these problems.
Best regards, Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| sirinath |
| Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:25 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Dec 17, 6:22 pm, "Wilco Dijkstra" <Wilco_dot_Dijks...@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
Quote: "sirinath" <sirinath19...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:39028072-f554-4249-a83f-7fce55ad9fd7@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Publication Number: WO/2007/039837
International Application No.: PCT/IB2006/053194
Publication Date: 12.04.2007
International Filing Date: 10.09.2006
more details are available at:http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2007039837
You've got a bit more than "some legal issues" here. There is a lot of precedent
for this kind of move-based architectures, search for "The WIZ processor" for
example, and you'll find loads of prior art that predates your patent's priority date.
There was a big thread on it here in comp.arch in 2004, which included all the
reasons why this kind of architecture can never be competitive.
So if you want to get any kind of funding you'll have to prove your invention works
and design the instruction set, a processor and an assembler/compiler for it.
If you do this you'll find that many of the advantages claimed are disadvantages...
Wilco
I should say much of what I have being saying is also mentioned in
Steve Bush's work. I am very impressed! At least there is some one
else who thinks like me!
Best regards, Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena
P.S. Also I want to point out there have been some people posting
messages using my nick name and impersonating my e-mail address on the
Usenet groups. I beg you to stop this since this would destroy my
reputation on these groups. - S.S.S.D. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
